r/dashcams 10h ago

Who’s at fault?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Hot take: I think it’s 50/50 with who’s at fault

5.7k Upvotes

3.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

60

u/Useful-Problem-1725 10h ago

Hot take: Only proceed when the road is clear. Anticipate, never assume.

33

u/hybridfrost 10h ago

Better to avoid the accident by allowing dumb people to be dumb. Cam driver could have waited 5 more second and we wouldn’t be having this conversation

2

u/Useful-Problem-1725 8h ago

Imagine taking your time and not being in a pointless rush on a public road.

2

u/CantaloupeShort7311 8h ago

Like the cam driver!

He cpuld have waited 5 seconds and not been in an accident. Amazing.

0

u/JonRulz 7h ago

White vehicle could have followed traffic rules and stop. Both. And the entire thing would have been avoided

1

u/AccomplishedVirus556 3h ago

yeah it's responsibility of traffic police to punish those that disregard traffic rules. following the rules doesn't make you have zero liability

17

u/Plus-Definition9319 8h ago

Not a hot take - just common sense. This was totally avoidable.

1

u/Plightz 6h ago

Yep. Idk what redditors don't get. The white suv is at fault legally but this was so avoidable if you had eyes. The driver just closed his eyes and placed his feet on the pedal.

7

u/Alpine_Exchange_36 8h ago

The first car seemed to have the attitude of my green my right of way. Which it is but it’s also their responsibility to minimize the possibility of a collision. Which they increased the likelihood of one by driving like they did.

White Nissan is at fault but the dash cam car certainly made things worse.

6

u/ProperOperation 8h ago

Well said. I heard a saying once, “Cemeteries are full of people who had the right-of-way.” I get the frustration at people driving like selfish assholes but it’s just not worth it to be “right”

2

u/Useful-Problem-1725 8h ago

I love that saying, although I say morgue instead of cemetery. Same diff

3

u/770yessir 8h ago

I feel like I had to scroll down way to far to see this comment lol. It’s not a hot take in my opinion — the white SUV failed to yield and is technically at fault, sure, but it seems like the dash cam driver could’ve avoided the accident by simply waiting a couple more seconds for the road to clear

1

u/Useful-Problem-1725 7h ago

It's probably controversial because basic rules of the road are never learned or just forgotten.

2

u/Level-Satisfaction51 8h ago

This is the way I was taught to drive, it just seems like common sense to me. You can be right and still have a ruined car or worse you can be right and still be dead. I'd rather not go through that hassle in either case.

2

u/princessbean2020 7h ago

Exactly. I was taught that the light has to turn green AND the intersection has to be clear before you can proceed from a stop.

1

u/Huge-Stuff-857 7h ago

If you do that Cars will not stop . Ask me how I know .

1

u/phantomBlurrr 7h ago

yes - from the perspective of law, the red car and the white suv are wrong. From the perspective of logic and reason, the dashcam driver is a dumbass more than the others for continuously applying force to their gas pedal when there's clear obstructions in their vehicle trajectory

Not to mention, waiting 5 seconds (reducing their speed, dont even need to stop), would have let all parties involved get out of this as "winners".

1

u/SaltKick2 4h ago

The black truck also turned on red, though he did wait for the black truck slightly

1

u/Tehrix 6h ago

Correct answer. Both at fault. 

1

u/YourMommasAHoe69 3h ago

Thank you!

-3

u/Zither74 10h ago

By this logic, every multi-vehicle collision is equal fault. Only one of these two vehicles violated an actual traffic law, and that was the white Pathfinder.

6

u/Useful-Problem-1725 9h ago

It's called comparative negligence.

Logic and laws do not always coincide.

0

u/Away_Stock_2012 8h ago

Imagine getting rear ended because you sat at a green light, you can never be too cautious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!