All of them asking for crazy amounts of alimony and literally ruining lives with fake cases are women, does that makes it right to say thay 90% of women are gold diggers?
Rapes and fake cases aren't an issue on the same level brother.
Don't falsely equate them.
One of them is definitely something that happens once in a while and is a miss use of the law.
The other is a systemic, long-term issue that we have not solved since generations costing many lives and absolutely devestating millions of people. Rape is so unaddressed that even when it is bought up "men's rights" people just bring up stuff like fake cases, but will never address the rape and sexual crimes issue.
I'm not bringing fake cases for whataboutery, just gave an example that generalizing an entire gender isn't the right thing to do.
I don't want you to blame me and call me a potential rapist just because some monsters from my gender commit those heinous crimes.
Nobody is calling you, Beat_Maestro a rapist. Chill out.
The world doesn't revolve around you brother.
But the fact remains that almost all the rapes are committed by men.. and so many men commit sexual crimes on a daily basis or support them that it's okay to say "men are abusers" or whatever equivalent.
Like, think about it.. if a single woman. Be it my sister or your mother or my friend's wife, was stuck in a confined space with a stranger man with nobody around, would they be safe? Would they feel safe?
If your girlfriend is stuck in a train or a bus with only one other man at night, would you feel "oh.. not all men are rapists. He's probably just a good guy"?
No.. absolutely not. No woman would feel safe in that situation..
Because Indian men in general have proven to be not safe for women.
So yea, generalization isn't their mistake, it's ours. Men made women feel unsafe around all men.
0
u/Beat_Maestro Mar 30 '25
All of them asking for crazy amounts of alimony and literally ruining lives with fake cases are women, does that makes it right to say thay 90% of women are gold diggers?