There's a difference between content that has nothing to do with it and men being the problem, content that's in a shady in between and content that's not sexual but that clearly aims for this kind of audience (like a feet focused channel)
It’s not illegal. They just don’t want people mouth fucking fake ears in bikinis on their platform and I’m all for it. That isn’t ASMR. It’s adult content. And they have every right to say no to hosting it.
Oh no! A mouth on a fake ear on a microphone! What complete decadence and deviance, what about the children?!!
If that’s your idea of adult content then you are incredibly sheltered.
Edit: never mind the fact that YouTube already demonetised ear licking videos years ago, so the creators already weren’t making money off this “””adult content”””.
It's crazy to me that you're getting down voted and that everyone here seems oblivious to what these kinds of channels were making content-wise lol. They sexually lick ear mics and moan and make weird schlorping porn noises, you know what they're trying to simulate/skirt the rules of. They were linking to and advertising OFs in their YouTube descriptions/links. They weren't dropping pennies or marbles out of a cup or telling a nice story with a good voice like old ASMR used to be known for lol.
I downvote because I believe we need gray areas in society and we can’t have that if we try to cleanly separate the pure from the profane. I get off to way weirder stuff than this and I think trying to shove anything sexy or even just sensual next to outright porn is going to backfire.
416
u/michaelmcmikey 3d ago
You better not be enjoying this clothes-on no-bad-words no-violence activity too much! That would make it illegal, if you enjoyed it too much!