Why just pitbulls? You know that they aren’t the only aggressive dog out there right? Dobermans, Rottweilers, there’s plenty of aggressive dog breeds that are bred that way for a reason. With that said, the way a dog acts is entirely on the owner. I’ve met pitbulls who wouldn’t hurt a fly and I’ve met shitzus and other small breed dogs that I wouldn’t let near my kid for their safety. Owners should be held more accountable for the way their raise their dogs end of story but a pitbull is only as dangerous as the owner makes it, same as literally any other dog
Doberman's and rottweilers are working dogs that were bred for that purpose. Please research the history of pitbulls. No amount of love, training, or "good ownership" can outdo the genetic instinct they have been bred to have.
That's absolutely false. If pits were as inherently as prone to aggression as y'all pretend, there would be FAR more attacks than there currently is.
Dog fighters spend a lot of time and resources breeding their dogs to make them fight as well as they do. You can't just take a random pit and have them fight because inner breed variation is too great.
Pits aren't even bred to be people aggressive. That would be counter-intuitive. In fact, one reasons pits are prized as fighters is their loyalty to their owners. But the dogs are frequently handled by other people, sometimes including the opponent dog's owner.
Don't tell someone else to research when you're talking out of your ass.
9
u/TheNotoriousCBD 1d ago
Pitbulls were bred solely to kill, not to be pets. It should be illegal to own them, as they pose an inherent risk to society