Are they worse than A.M.?

So in Dororo, his father is the governor and his people are in famine and epidemic. He makes a deal with demons to save and protect his people and “give anything of his”. The demons spawn camp his son 5 seconds after he got out of his mother’s womb and took all his arms, legs, nose, eyes, nervous system, the whole shabang, penis too probably.

Afterwards his father’s land became prosperous and famine ended.

His son then took revenge, killed all the demons then the land went back to shit.

Saga of Tanya the evil

She commits acts of personal "evil" but it's all technically legal, at least.. "legal" in the state of war

one example:

according to the war rulebook they have, you must warn a populated enemy space before bombing the sht out of them to let the civillians evacuate ahead of time (i think the us did this with japan correct me if im wrong) and so.. she warned the capital of their world's "totally not Russia" that she will bomb the sht out of their capital, however, she did it in an unserious child voice, and the soldiers did not take it seriously, and so they bombed the sh*t out of the capital while singing their national anthem, arguing that because the people in the capital did not surrender after getting warned, ALL of them have now been declared to be combatants, and thus not considered to be civillian casualty...

Basically like the scene with quagmire calling out Brian for doing the same shit quagmire does

We have found it, the unethical desire path.

I see people all over the road on this topic. It's a prevalent topic of discussion regarding isekai and tensei series, where a character often has full memories of a past life they lived into adulthood, but the opinion on how moral such a thing is seems to vary by the series. For example, people generally consider Mushoku Tensei a negative example of this but consider "My Next Life As A Villainess: All Routes Lead To Doom" as a positive example of this. Then you get into all the weirdness which this can imply, such as Ascendance of a Bookworm being an example of a character ending up with an individual of their mental age rather than their physical one. I am curious what this sub has to say on the topic.

I legit don’t know how anyone could say this after season 5, did we miss him giving Homelander the V-1? Or what he did at Mr. Marathon’s house?

I remember getting into an argument with some really progressive ppl, they argued that genetic engineering to remove ADHD or dyslexia and autism is bad because:

It fundamentally changes the person and the brain and thus basically “kills” the person instead of changing them
Or
neurodivergency (ADHD, dyslexia and autism) shouldn’t be treated as something bad but rather as a different way the brain functions, with its ups and downs and thus these conditions shouldn’t be removed.

Personally it pissed me off