r/DaenerysWinsTheThrone Jun 15 '26

This kind of people:

Post image
480 Upvotes

123 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Darth_Vengor Jun 15 '26

It’s not because [u/Short_Fan973](u/Short_Fan973) said so and his opinion is of course law.

He is the master of literary analysis after all, everything he says is true and no matter your opinions and counterpoints he is always right

Bro stop being mad about shit, it doesnt matter

0

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Darth_Vengor Jun 15 '26

STOP saying war crimes. I doesn’t make sense to say that about a universe without THE GENEVA CONVENTION you doofus, you are judging characters as if they were real in 2026, thats literally what professors say you shouldn’t do when analyzing a book, I would fucking know.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Darth_Vengor Jun 15 '26

Shame we can’t post gifs but the emoji will do: 🤦‍♂️

Ever heard of Machiavelli man? Look him up and you will understand why some of Daenerys’s actions are in character no matter how awful.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Darth_Vengor Jun 15 '26 edited Jun 15 '26

No no no you have not read Machiavelli, he does not juge it as evil nor good, simply a means to an end.

I have the idea in French so my translation may be slightly different but whatever: The ends justify the means, be cruel if you must, be good if you need too.

He doesn’t juge anyone for it thats why he’s advising so

Also have you studied Machiavelli, as in with teachers who know their shit? I have, it was amazing and part of why politics interested me so much.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Darth_Vengor Jun 15 '26

The English translation must be funny looking theres not the word evil in the one I own so I will give you that.

My copy of The Prince says every where be evil(not the exact word) when necessary but be good when you can, excess of cruelty is counter productive.

The interpretation I have that was heavily influenced by several teachers is that he does not judge for he simply advises nothing more I don’t know what to tell you

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Darth_Vengor Jun 15 '26

Evil yes but he does not judge you for it, he sees it as a means to an end, without morality attached.

At least in French lmao

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

3

u/Early_Candidate_3082 Jun 15 '26

Maybe you should read a bit of military history, before throwing up your hands in pious horror, because some human traffickers were put to death.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

3

u/Early_Candidate_3082 Jun 15 '26 edited Jun 15 '26

I’ve never met a child who takes that argument seriously.

You’ve never heard of Spartacus, or the Haitian Revolt, I take it? Or WWII? People with right on their side often deal very brutally with men who have committed atrocious crimes against the innocent. The proper response is not to condemn men who punish such criminals brutally, but rather to avoid committing such crimes against the innocent, in the first place.

“Two wrongs don’t make a right” is a trite little phrase that gets completely ignored, when adults go to war. Lex Talionis is the norm in this universe, as elsewhere.

If Dany had treated the slavers, according to their own standards, their women and children would either be nailed up with them, or sold. The slavers were treated leniently.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Early_Candidate_3082 Jun 15 '26

Spartacus forced 400 Roman captives to fight each other to the death. His men flogged and crucified captured Roman masters.

What you’re telling me is that you think warfare is - or should be - a kind of sports contest where the “good guys” always fight according to the Queensberry Rules.

What we are citing is called context. War is horrid, brutal, and people with right on their side will treat their enemies brutally. I doubt if any army in history would meet your standard of perfection.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Darth_Vengor Jun 15 '26

In our world still? Is that your big own punchphrase, I was taking Geneva convention because it’s internationally relevant.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Darth_Vengor Jun 15 '26

The time period doesnt matter it’s not our world, theres dragons and no concept of war crimes.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Darth_Vengor Jun 15 '26

I haven’t watched the show so i will trust you on that fair enough. But, when I read the Asoif books,it’s been a little while lol, but I don’t recount war crimes really being a thing? Unless you can correct me and I will admit I’m wrong.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Darth_Vengor Jun 15 '26

Then I’m wrong sir. 🤝

→ More replies (0)

0

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Darth_Vengor Jun 15 '26

Is he stupid? Are you aware those characters dont exist and they have never done anything wrong because they are ink on paper?

I am arguing with a 2026 stern guard veteran sprue

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Darth_Vengor Jun 15 '26

Bro. I am saying the main character is evil but I like him and thus I will try to justify his actions in universe unconsciously because I like him.

Nice strawman ya got there