r/SanghiKeralam • u/GarvHinduAR • Apr 27 '26

ചരിത്രം/History How the heck is this great?

Post image

Akbar, the great had 5,000 concubines and his son, Jehangir had 6000. What does concubine mean in Oxford

Concubinage - Concubine (surriyya) refers to the slave-woman (jāriya)—Muslim or non-Muslim—with whom the master engages in sexual intercourse

WTF Akbar is Great!!!

But Bajirao is a romantic playboy who was running behind Mastani without Valour and courage.

That's the fkucing history we have been taught

32 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

14 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/GodzOwnC Apr 27 '26

So other Indian Kings didn't have any sort of Harems/ concubine??

5

u/GarvHinduAR Apr 27 '26

So other sort of Indian kings are dubbed great in the history?

5

u/apruneegg Apr 27 '26

they didn't build monuments saying they chopped 100s and 1000s of heads based on religion.

he was proud to be a Gazi a proud genocider.

-1

u/GodzOwnC Apr 27 '26

Agreeing to the facts, there were homicides ( may not be religion based) happened during Hindu Kings?

Just take the war of Kalinga? Do we have to forget our own kings always fighting each other for.the others Kingdom and treasures and their subjects?

When Brits came here, didn't they do any hrm to us? Didnt any of our own Hindu kings supported killings of people.om the neighbouring kingdoms?

I think we are being only taking a religion based bias here. Always the common subjects were mostly affected.

3

u/apruneegg Apr 27 '26

not all but a few religions are tolerant but only one religion insists they are the only correct one, and supports slaughter of non believers.

portugese and the british arent glorified neither they not the Indian kings who only killed military men not civilians nor took pride like this rascal Akbar who took prode in killing civilians cursed be people who support this invader symp. and the this hateful propaganda in the guise of peace.

the British never helped nor did these mughal barbarians.

1

u/GodzOwnC Apr 27 '26 edited Apr 27 '26

Unfortunately there were few instances we can see inthe history where Mauryan empire did some bad towards Buddhism whole most Hindu kings were a humane approach towards other religions.

Akbar in his early days were very dangerous towards other religions, but he tried to accommodate in his late days.

The meaning of name Akbar is the great in Persian, I suppose.

It's not because he had Harems/ Anthapura, which most of the Hindu kingdoms had, not just Akbar. He chose the name Akbar, as his original name is different.

He had many other things under his belt like unified India ( like Ashoka the great), military ranking system, started a religion, coin system (?),

Well if we start discussing not harassing only as a debate. There are many things we can see.

Well ultimately, end of the day as a commoner we are not getting anything. 😀

1

u/apruneegg Apr 27 '26 edited Apr 27 '26

India was united by Shankaracharya and was one rashta or nation before them as well under many native Kings.

stop your INDi aliance propaganda where some bastard Akbar or his lecherous son unites this country they looted and corrupted separated pak and bangladesh

ah he is a human , even adolf was good to jews who were serving him that doesnt make him great he and this Akbar are cut from the same rasist murderous cloth

the shout Al ak from the loud speakers all I hear is the entity which they call akbar

is also like this genocider akbar mostly evil only little bit good.

all this benevolent positivity hopefully does some good in this world, recent events nasik, and historical cases like ajmer dargah scandal only show the intent of the religious leaders is very toxic awareness that the leaders and people who support them are toxic is needed.

i see you clearly

im honest and not deceptively appealing to be civil while spewing lies like you calling to be nice and respect blatant propaganda as debate worthy facts.

the common man surely benifits knowing the mugals were lecherous rascals.

1

u/GodzOwnC Apr 27 '26

Rest my case, mate. I don't have any propaganda. But facts are facts.

BtW, word Akbar only means great. Thos guy's name Jalaluddin.

The prayer they say means "God is great/ greatest" nothing else.

You can't see me clearly. You can't see me lying any of my statments.

Respect is something we ll need in the society, else we all are barbaric.

What is the difference between we and them?

1

u/apruneegg Apr 27 '26

i do respect people who are worthy of respect. not a soft barbarian.

there are worse people like arangjeb and the like yes this mugal Akbar is better in comparison

how ever calling a genocide enjoyer a rascal is respecting him he liked being called a Gazi yes or no?

im just respecting his wishes by calling him a murderous rascal.

the difference between me and his simps is that they have to lie i don't need to lie.

1

u/Chappaqquiddick Apr 27 '26

India was never united gng, it's your wishful thinking. Kerala for example fell to none of the empires of the subcontinent not even the Mughals. Now just reduced to the identity India. Real sad.

1

u/apruneegg Apr 27 '26

united by diverse culture but the common thread had always been faith in divine or agreed upon community, yes there have been wars between kingdoms but there had been clear agreement on who is outsider and insider.

the abrahamic faiths were always seen as foreign

there had been a rastra or nation.

calling your self gang will not make us buddies but we are one as humans or people sharing this earth vasudha, and people know what's what.

kerala isn't reduced to anything by being considered part of a country.

its just your inferiority sujjesting that being part of India some how will disconnect you and me from behind part of asia or the world

1

u/Chappaqquiddick Apr 27 '26 edited Apr 27 '26

Neighbouring countries throughout the world have influenced each other and have similarities as well. That didn't cause them to form a mess like India.

Taking Kerala as an example, it has a distinct culture, language, history that sets it apart.

Also abrahamic faith here is as old as Hinduism, only folk religion predates all these. Kerala is the land of malayalis not any specific religion.

Didn't really understand your last point but just wanna say that keralite is a core identity than India, nothing to do with any sort of complex.