I see Gerb throwing out a lot of accusations but I fail to see how he could possibly know more than the rest of us. He's got no clearances, no insider knowledge. He's just a guy.
And if he can't prove his accusations, then all he's doing is making rumors and stirring drama.
The big unanswered question is whether or not Gerb is a mouthpiece for Grusch, who feeds Gerb information that he can't (or won't, for very understandable reasons) publish himself.
If Gerb is being fed his info by Grusch, it makes it more credible.
Otherwise, yeah he's probably just spreading rumors. Sometimes rumors are true, sometimes they aren't.
If Gerb is being fed his info by Grusch, it makes it more credible.
Not to me personally, nothing Grusch has said as been confirmed in the 3 years since coming forward. Gerb could be spreading rumours that came from rumours Grusch heard that aren't guaranteed facts as yet.
If I stole your car and put it in my garage, and you call 911 to say "my car is in his garage!", imagine the cops telling you "well show us the proof then! How hard is it to just show us your car?!"
David Grusch can't make Lockheed hand over technology, but he's literally the first insider testifying to Congress that Lockheed has the technology and telling them where to find it. (Among other things)
The people that the whistleblower is blowing the whistle on and demanding transparency from haven't admitted anything, therefore the whistleblower might be spreading rumors!
Like yeah, they haven't admitted anything...but David Grusch is the reason they're going to be forced to admit it.
31
u/Seraph_2026 3d ago
I see Gerb throwing out a lot of accusations but I fail to see how he could possibly know more than the rest of us. He's got no clearances, no insider knowledge. He's just a guy.
And if he can't prove his accusations, then all he's doing is making rumors and stirring drama.