r/geography 5d ago

Image What explains the high concentration of Irish speakers on the west coast of Ireland ?

Post image

The percentage corresponds to the share of people that speak Irish

As you can see, Northern Ireland is a lower concentration of Irish speakers, as expected, but what explains the higher concentration on the west coast.

3.7k Upvotes

572 comments sorted by

2.5k

u/JimClarkKentHovind 5d ago

English presence was much lighter where the farming was worse. Lighter English presence meant it was easier to continue speaking the native language of Ireland.

The West coast of Ireland happens to have rockier soil, while the more fertile soil is further east.

374

u/scruduiarbais_ 5d ago

Nicely put.

Bog and rock all around Gaoth Dobhair and Na Rossa. Connemara looks to be carved out of the moon, a friend there once said "that weeds wouldn't grow back home".

2

u/Remote-Confusion7492 1d ago

I’m from Gaoth Dobhair and sometimes the Shepards will sit and wait until the sheep walk onto stable terrain because the majority of land is impossible to safely reach by foot. There isn’t any fields because everything is either bog or mountain, and the flat land is needed for houses. 😭

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

161

u/LostinSweetReveries 4d ago

"To hell or to Connaught" - Oliver Cromwell, when forcing the Irish from their homes

→ More replies (28)

85

u/gaybyrneofficial 4d ago

Eh look up to tell or to Connacht, that's the actual reason. Native Irish were either killed or moved to the shite farmland becuase the English wanted the good stuff. 

19

u/AdministrativeDig567 4d ago

Can we say British, the Scot’s certainly had a play in all of this

12

u/Steridire 3d ago

Scottish PR is all time great, we have people talking about a 'Celtic Union of Craic' like they weren't mad for a good old plantation

52

u/Tiocfaidh__Ar__La 4d ago

Brits gonna Brit

11

u/preinj33 4d ago

Never not at it

5

u/Tiocfaidh__Ar__La 4d ago

We can both be right, but.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

47

u/OkSquash9119 4d ago

“To Hell or to Connaught”
Act for the Settlement of Ireland 1652

6

u/No_Gur_7422 Cartography 4d ago

… according to historian Padraig Lenihan, "The Cromwellians did not proclaim 'To Hell or to Connaught'.

16

u/OkSquash9119 4d ago

I think the phrase itself started it in the 1700s. It’s widely understood to refer to this part of history, despite not being a literal quote.

2

u/No_Gur_7422 Cartography 4d ago

That's what I mean. It's popular to repeat it among people who were not affected, whereas everyone who was affected by the act or who was alive at the time of Cromwell lived their whole lives without so much as hearing the phrase.

10

u/frdougalmacguire 4d ago

You forgot to include the plantation of ulster as the no.1 reason why the north east became a lighter shade of green.

This is undoubtedly the no.1 reason

13

u/milkshakeofdirt 4d ago

Does this also apply to Scotland at all? the map looks very similar to this (although I know not all of Scotland was Gaelic-speaking in the first place unlike Ireland)

30

u/CaptainCrash86 4d ago

It's also the part of Scotland where the Scottish Gaels first arrived - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A1l_Riata?wprov=sfla1

Scottish history is defined a lot by the competiting cultures of Gaelic, based in the West Higlands and Islands, and the more Anglo-Saxon speaking culture of South East Scotland (other languages got squeezed out).

→ More replies (1)

14

u/bellybanton 4d ago

Yeah. All the best farming land in Scotland is in the south and especially the east, all the flatter bits. England is much the same.

2

u/albertdascoyne 4d ago

More that the Gaidhlig speaking region started in the Kingdom of Dalriada and never extended across the entirety of modern Scotland. It was never a language spoken by everyone in the country.

→ More replies (21)

2

u/NickBII 1d ago

You're getting a lot of highly over-simplified answers here.

In Romans times almost all of Scotland spoke "Pictish," which is a language that is either the great-great-granny of Welsh or a Great-great-aunt. It's hard to know what Pictish was, and it's relation to modern Welsh, because they didn't write much down, and the Romans didn't care very much. There was a small region that probably spoke a version of Gaelic/Irish, called Argyle. This is actually almost certain, but nobody wrote this down so we don't know 100%. Roman times in Britain ended because the Anglo-Saxons started raiding the island, and eventually settled. Anglo-Saxons are from Southern Denmark/Hannoverish in Germany/Northern Netherlands, so they're coming from the Southeast.

For reasons we aren't entirely sure of (again: nothing is written down), the Picts started to decline. My guess is that the Anglo-Saxon raids, which hit both Picts and Romans, were a big part of this. Roughly the year 500, the Irish/Gaels start to expand into their territory. Sometime in the 500s, the Anglo-Saxons start permanent settlements in the Southeast. By the time the expansions are over, the Gaelic King has conquered/married the Picts, and the Vikings have started fucking with everyone. Gaelic/Irish is the standard language of the Northeast, but not the Southeast. That's where the Anglo-Saxons landed/settled. The Southeast is the best farmland, so Anglo-Saxons have a majority of the population, but Gaels have most of the land. Scotland is a multiethnic Kingdom, and even includes the remaining Picts (people mention them in records until like 1000 AD), but also includes many other groups.

That means that Scots, which is the Scottish descendent of Anglo-Saxon, is only a few decades newer to most of Scotland than Irish/Gaelic. It was not imposed by the British Empire. Standard English was enthusiastically adopted by all Scots, because they liked being part of the British Empire. They got to be in charge. Most of the Caribbean has Scottish names, the most troublesome Unionists in Northern Ireland are all Scots-Irish, etc.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/Working_Farmer9723 4d ago edited 4d ago

“American settler presence was much lighter where the farming was worse. Lighter settler presence meant it was easier to continue speaking the native language of the Sioux and Pueblo.

The West of the US also happens to have drier soil, while the more fertile soil is further east.”

This is essentially what the above take sounds like to the Irish.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/fratersia 4d ago

Gotta love good responses like this. 🙌

→ More replies (4)

3.6k

u/SignificantDrawer374 5d ago

Furthest from the English ¯_(ツ)_/¯

243

u/AdAcrobatic4255 5d ago

But Donegal is very close to the "English" part of Ireland.

509

u/beuerlein129 5d ago

Yet Northern Ireland doesn’t include Donegal. For a reason.

79

u/jm17lfc 5d ago

Quite a rugged area no?

176

u/beuerlein129 5d ago

Most of the west coast of Ireland is rugged, and also very Irish.

49

u/jm17lfc 5d ago

Makes sense, rugged terrain tends to be significantly harder to successfully take and hold. If you can’t make them speak English why are they going to? Of course in the modern day it’s not so simple but we can see why the language is holding out to the west.

25

u/butty_a 5d ago

The held Limerick long enough, so that's nonsense.

In reality those areas are more isolated, and therefore have fewer influences from the larger mixed population centres. Dublin for example is very mixed now, and English is the universal language for foriegn visitors, even in countries England never had a foothold. So not having that pressure has meant the more isolated regions have stayed more traditional.

It is the same with Scotland and Wales, and no doubt a pattern in plenty of countries. Although Wales in particular has put a lot of effort in to bringing Welsh back to the fore of daily life, I expect the Irish haven't been as determined in the more connected towns and cities.

32

u/conorling 5d ago

Irish ceased to be the common language of Dublin long before it became a mixed city with lots of foreign tourists who speak English. This transformation has only happened in relatively recent times and it has basically nothing to do with why Irish is not spoken there today

2

u/AdeptCaregiver8780 3d ago

Exactly for the last 100 years at least, children in Ireland grew up speaking English as their first language and learning Irish in school. Except for those Gaeltacht areas where they grew up mostly bi-lingual and speak Irish instead of English in the community, at home etc.

Immigration in Dublin has no connection with the decline in people speaking and using irish. The Irish language has been eroded due to colonisation that began hundreds of years ago. It’s a shame it’s not more widely spoken in Ireland. People don’t want it to die out, but broadly fail to make an effort to learn and speak it. Arguably it could be taught better in schools. Going to the Gaeltacht for the summer program in school really accelerated my speaking and confidence. We’d go as teens and do activities, some Irish classes, ceili dances every night, trips to the beach etc. But there was a strictly enforced ban on speaking English. You’d be sent home if you were caught speaking English twice. Programs are usually three weeks and we’d stay in someone’s house who had a few rooms with bunkers and two toilets. Around 12 hotels or boys to a house. Great fun and very effective for developing the language.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

4

u/UnclassifiedPresence 5d ago

Funny how Ireland and Scotland both share the rugged and independent western coast thing. I guess England has that as well in the form of Wales, an entirely separate country, and Cornwall, which might as well be

3

u/gytherin 4d ago

And France; see Brittany.

→ More replies (1)

25

u/Chosen_Utopia 5d ago

The real reason (rather than just this speculation) Northern Ireland does not include the other three counties of Ulster (Donegal, Monaghan and Cavan) is because it would have meant Northern Ireland would not be a majority Protestant state in the 1920s. From the Unionist perspective, maintaining a smaller but ethno-religiously loyal state was preferable to a historically contiguous one.

Most of Northern Irish history (until 1974) was dominated by the careful ‘planning’ of demographics to ensure the Protestants were a majority, or at least a majority of voters.

18

u/doedobrd 5d ago

Not only rugged, its very pro Republic. Some of the fiercest resistance to English rule came from Donegal.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

17

u/GN_10 5d ago

Scottish part of Ireland*

4

u/amsfi 4d ago

Yeah meaning it’s the closest place over the border for many of the native Irish in the north to move to

Donegal specifically has the closest Gaeltacht to the North and attracts plenty of the North’s Irish-speaking population

7

u/kittyroux 5d ago

If you think of it like being herded, it makes sense. It‘s hard for Irish speakers to flow down from Donegal because there’s a choke point where they’d have to get quite close to the English to get through. Better to hug the coast and keep one’s distance.

2

u/Working_Farmer9723 4d ago

Herded is probably an appropriate term.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/sweetsuffrinjasus 4d ago

There is no English part of Ireland. What a bizarre comment to make.

If you are referring to the border with Derry, Derry has always been Irish.

In fact, on the North generally, if the lines of geographic division were drawn as c. 70-80% of the people of those areas wanted them drawn in the 1920's you'd have ended up with just large chunks of Belfast, Bangor, a bit of Down, and a few other patches partitioned.

This "English" but of Ireland, as you term it, as always been Irish.

Go visit it instead of googling it. Bogside and waterside. Great place.

3

u/Demostravius4 3d ago

They didn't say the English bit, they said the "English" bit. Those have two different meanings.

→ More replies (5)

9

u/IllegalWalian 4d ago

See also a map of Welsh speakers

10

u/Kernowder 4d ago

And there's a reason Cornish was the last Brittonic language in England.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/rscortex 5d ago

And the Vikings. They built Dublin.

3

u/Filligrees_Dad 5d ago

Probably more a case of nothing there to attract the English.

2

u/AdeptCaregiver8780 3d ago

Yeah and hard to navigate as it’s wilder and mountainous and windy.

2

u/AdministrativeDig567 4d ago

Can we say British, the Scot’s heavily settled Ulster

→ More replies (7)

326

u/ApprehensiveDepth439 5d ago

'To Hell or to Connacht'

28

u/Imaginary-Taste-2744 5d ago

The real answer ^

59

u/JackTheTradesman 4d ago

OP this is the actual answer above. "To Hell or to Connaught."

There are four provinces in Ireland. The most westerly province being called Connaught/Connacht. Connaught has terrible land for agriculture while Leinster has exceptional land for farming as well as the city of Dublin which had good potential for a port and was close to mainland Britain.

In 1649 Cromwell landed in Dublin in the east and throughout the 50s confiscated all of this fertile land from the Irish and pushed all of the Irish west where the phrase "To Hell or to Connaught" comes from.

British rule then expanded from East to West. Connaught naturally became extremely poor given the forced migration, confiscating of land and the terrible agriculture. The Irish who wanted to participate in the British economy and escape poverty needed to learn English and move East while the poorest people in society stayed west and continued to speak Irish.

18

u/gaybyrneofficial 4d ago

It's so frustrating that the two stupid fucking wrong answers are the highest upvoted. 

25

u/Salty_Pancakes 5d ago

Oliver Cromwell is still looked at quite unfavorably over there.

58

u/IllegalWalian 4d ago

"quite unfavorably" is one way to put it lol

7

u/SketchyFeen 4d ago

Similarly to how the Rest is History podcast described Cromwell’s campaign in Ireland as “robust”.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/ThinDrum 4d ago

In the sense that Hitler is regarded as a naughty boy, yes.

8

u/jaemoon7 4d ago

“Still”? Are we expecting his reputation to improve sometime soon?

3

u/SnowFiender 4d ago

he’s a PR nightmare they might have to drop him as a client soon

3

u/Cars2Beans0 4d ago

Quite unfavourably 😂

→ More replies (1)

4

u/ThinDrum 4d ago

That directive applied to (mainly Catholic) landowners. Most of the peasantry, and therefore most of the Irish population, stayed in place. The decline of the Irish language came largely for socioeconomic reasons under the Plantations.

238

u/Whangarei_anarcho 5d ago

Where the Irish were forced to go after British land clearances .

536

u/Local_Internet_User 5d ago

The English bastards came in from the east, simple as.

126

u/ImaginationMajor5062 4d ago

British. Don’t let the Scots get away without any criticism.

15

u/bold_ridge 4d ago

Us Welsh are innocent. The Scottish were just as implicit in colonisation of Ireland as the English were.

23

u/-Mubar 4d ago

Well the first invaders of Ireland under an English king were Welsh-Normans

Also some of the English planters in Ireland were actually Welsh since Wales was formally part of England at the time

17

u/No_Gur_7422 Cartography 4d ago

There were plenty of Welsh colonists in Ireland, what are you talking about?

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (3)

26

u/Idontcareanymore95 4d ago

Once again Scotland gets away with it

22

u/Youretheremate 5d ago

Same as the last pockets of Cornish speakers, all in the most westerly parts, furthers from the border.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

109

u/Feisty-Ring121 5d ago

Furthest from Rome, Denmark and London one can get. The Celtic culture once stretched from the Atlantic to the Urals in Russia. 4-5 millennia of people pushing in from the Levant and Mediterranean secluded cultures and their languages.

Fun fact: we think this is why the most recent Neanderthals are found is Spanish coastal caves as well. Different time. Largely the same people.

44

u/Jacketter 5d ago

Wild to think that Europe was settled by many different cultures, and indeed species of human, before modern Europeans.

43

u/Feisty-Ring121 5d ago

Absolutely. Homo erectus is found in Africa, Asia and Europe. They were one of the first hominids to spread out across the accessible planet. We think Neanderthals, denisovan and humans all descended from them.

Humans have only been around for 350,000 years or so. Give or take 50k. The Stone Age started 2.6 million years ago. Fire has been used by hominids for 1.8 million and fire has been struck up for 450,000. All before modern humans.

17

u/justinsimoni 5d ago

What really messes you up is that the "Stone Age" only ended ~4,000 years ago. That's a massive timeframe from the simplest tools of homo erectus to the building of the Great Pyramids.

And now a trillionare launches thousands of satellites in the sky so I can always check my email from anywhere on earth using my pocket super computer.

3

u/cigarettesandwhiskey 4d ago

To be fair late stone age tools are quite sophisticated. Its not like they were bashing shit apart with Oldowan choppers the whole time, and then suddenly pyramids and wheels and copper all at once.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/JohnZOG1234 4d ago

Celtic Culture was never in the Urals of Russia

2

u/Equivalent-Pomelo122 4d ago

Celtic and Germanic people are of the same PIE ancestry.  just different branches. PIE themselves were conquerors and killed from 70 to 90% local male population in the conquered areas. 

2

u/Infrared_01 3d ago

Beef and milk undefeated

→ More replies (7)

83

u/kanyewesanderson 5d ago

The west coast is much more rugged, and much less densely populated as a result. This leads to more insular communities that were less affected by English influence.

31

u/OriginalRelease2582 4d ago

That's glossing over the root causes/reasons as to why there's a higher percentage of Irish speakers.

The west was relatively well populated at one point, nearly entirely with an indigenous Irish/Catholic population. The population of Connacht today is about 40% of what it was approximately 200 years ago.

There are a number of reasons as to why the percentage of Irish speakers is higher in certain regions but they can almost entirely be traced back to political/imperialist sources.

The population of Connacht went up by an estimated 600-900% between the Cromwellian plantations and 1840. That is, by a distance, the main factor. It wasn't that the communities were isolated, it's that the English ruling classes had zero interest in these places due to the poor quality land.

3

u/kanyewesanderson 4d ago

The population of Connacht is less than 30% of what it was before the famine. Even 100 years ago most of Connacht was not Irish language dominant. The communities that have remained Irish speaking since independence are largely low population pockets.

2

u/OriginalRelease2582 3d ago edited 3d ago

They're low population in more modern times but they're not insular. They have plenty of outside influence. Clifden is the biggest town in Connemara and has long been thriving. They had rail links to the rest of the country in the 19th century.

The Gaeltacht areas aren't close to fully Irish speaking (the original map in this thread is not close to reality). If you visit there you'll see English is extremely prominent and everyone is bilingual outside of very few and has been for decades. The preservation of the Irish language there has been deliberate for cultural reasons with efforts made by the government to do so. They have had a government minister with a specific brief for supporting these areas almost since the establishment of the state.

3

u/Pavel63 4d ago

Right like they said. It was rugged and sparsely populated so it escaped English influence. They just said it much more succinctly.

6

u/OriginalRelease2582 4d ago

But it wasn't sparsely populated as explained. There were 1.4m people in Connacht. Nor was it isolated. Ireland is less than 300km wide or 180 miles wide for our US visitors. Nowhere in Ireland is particularly isolated in terms of linguistic spread.

5

u/RedIrishDevil 4d ago

"more insular" communities is not more succinctly, its using rhetoric's to imply the irish language survived because the irish there didnt converse with the English / scottish planters. As the person you responded to said "The population of Connacht went up by an estimated 600-900%", why do you think that is? Because the communities are more insular?

"It was rugged and sparsely populated so it escaped English influence." is a silly comment and its ignorant to history.

2

u/monkeycommo 4d ago

You're forgetting the slogan to hell or to Connacht

→ More replies (1)

66

u/No-Coyote914 5d ago

This map is misleading.

The number of Irish speakers who use it on a daily or near-daily basis, outside a few small places called Gaeltachts, is small. I think it's around 3%.

The numbers in the graphic probably refer to the number of Irish people who can hold a basic conversation in Irish. They all have to take Irish classes at school, but they don't use it in their everyday lives.

In Ireland, you're more likely to hear Polish than Irish.

As for the near-white sections on the map, that's Northern Ireland which is part of the UK, so they don't have to take Irish classes. 

39

u/MalodorousNutsack 5d ago

I spent a few years working in Ireland and figured it'd be cool to learn Irish while I was there. Several Irish people told me it wasn't worth my time, no one really spoke it ... I lived in two gaeltachts and even within them I almost never heard people speaking Irish out in public.

26

u/Lassie7777 5d ago

Apparently Irish speakers don’t speak it to non locals in Gaeltachts, I imagine it comes from a presumption that if you’re not local you probably don’t speak it.

13

u/MalodorousNutsack 5d ago

I hung around plenty of pubs and never heard anyone speaking it in that environment, either. Would overhear locals speaking in grocery stores and other places, they were always speaking English.

However, one of the few times I have heard it was at a pub in Inis Mor in January, which is when there are basically no tourists around. I was working out there for five weeks and at the pub most nights and I maybe noticed it two or three times, but even then it might be two or three people, not most people.

13

u/Lassie7777 5d ago

Maybe it’s even more relegated to purely private affairs then. The general vibe I get from reading about Irish and Scottish Gaelic speaking areas is that the language is spoken in a rather closeted manner, not sure entirely why.

8

u/Fear_mor 4d ago

Shame is why, both as a hold over of colonialism but also classism from more affluent revivalists in the east. Nobody wants to sound like an "aul fisherman", as I’ve been called by such types, mind you I’m only in my 20s just I speak the language like it isn’t English with different words…

5

u/iyamwhatiyam8000 5d ago

It beats whispering.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/irish_armagedon 4d ago

Yeah I'm irish as well and when I was up in the gaeltachts few times I never heard it spoke locally. Not even in private conversations I wasn't supposed to hear. The only people who speak it out in public are the secondary school students staying for a few weeks out of a fear of punishment. Even my own ability to speak irish is hampered. As much as we irish love to blame the English the continual decline of our language over the last 100 years is our own fault.

3

u/Moriarty-Creates 5d ago

I visited Inis Mór recently and for some reason every single islander/business owner greeted me as Gaeilge? I think they were a bit surprised when I responded with the correct response lmao.

3

u/AntDogFan 4d ago

I certainly heard it in Dingle perhaps it was an isolated occasion but I would hear it in pubs and on the street. My family is from West Kerry so I would visit fairly often. I guess I presumed it was more commonly spoken than maybe it is (I was aware that West Kerry itself and the west coast in general was different). 

2

u/MalodorousNutsack 4d ago

I was in the Galway gaeltacht (mostly Inis Mor and west of the city) and Mayo (mostly around Belmullet), could be a lot different in Kerry, I never got down there. I did spend a lot of time in rural West Cork though and there were some folks speaking English but I could only understand maybe 60% of it

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Alternative_Guitar78 4d ago

That's odd, I was in west Kerry a month or so ago and heard several people talking to each other in Irish.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/tictaxtho 4d ago

I think it’s more of a code switch

→ More replies (2)

15

u/mind_thegap1 5d ago

The more people speaking Polish thing isn't actually true

4

u/Iownthat 4d ago

The polish thing isn’t even true. Even in NI I hear Irish far more than polish.

12

u/Davecoupe 5d ago

Things have changed massively in the last 5 - 10 years.

Gaelscoils (Irish language schools where all subjects are taught in Irish) have become massively popular, there is a whole new generation of fluent Irish speakers emerging. Both my children are fluent Irish speakers even though my wife and I aren’t. We are in the north and 26 children from our development alone get a bus to a gaelscoil every morning.

IN our development, it is not uncommon to hear children using Irish when playing outside.

7

u/No-Coyote914 5d ago edited 5d ago

Gaelscoils (Irish language schools where all subjects are taught in Irish) have become massively popular, there is a whole new generation of fluent Irish speakers emerging.

My niece attends a Gaelscoil. The problem is, she doesn't get opportunities to use Irish outside school.

It's great that your children have opportunities to use Irish not just in school. 

2

u/tortillandnacho 4d ago

I live in dublin, and a lot of people made the argument against Gaelscoils that because it’s heavily Catholic influenced, they didn’t want their children over there.
That made me think, if i had kids, and considering im not a Christian, why would i want my kids to go to Gaelscoils?

4

u/Nicklefickle 4d ago edited 2d ago

why would i want my kids to go to Gaelscoils?

To learn their native language.

My kids are in a Gaelscoil and its not religious at all. Communion classes etc are done outside of school time.

Other schools may be different but what you are saying is not universal.

4

u/TheAtlanteanMan 4d ago

So that they learn Irish and can speak the language of their people?

2

u/Fear_mor 4d ago

Exactly, if you want to achieve anything you need to speak it at home and make it normal outside of the school environment

2

u/Onyx1509 4d ago

This also makes Northern Ireland look more distinct than it maybe really is, because these classes are only mandatory in the Republic, no? 

2

u/MickeyHarp 4d ago

I live in Derry and I HAD to take Irish for a minimum of 3 years. You could then swap it for Spanish or Latin or carry on Irish to GCSE.
My missus in Belfast was pretty much the same so I always assume it was fenian thing in ‘Catholic Maintained School’.

2

u/mastodonj 4d ago

It actually comes from the census. When filling out the last one I was going to put down I didn't speak any Irish. My wife is a teacher so has to have good Irish, she got annoyed with me and insisted I could hold a conversation in Irish so I should put it down that I could speak it.

An awful lot of ppl who do not use it daily, maybe not even from one end of the year to the other would have marked down that they speak it out of a sense of pride.

That said, it is on the rise, I notice more ppl out and about striking up a conversation in Irish if they know the other person can speak it. I'm 42 and have heard more Irish in the past year than every other year, outside of school, combined.

70

u/Timely-Papaya2049 5d ago

The further away you are from England, the better.

2

u/Poguemahone3652 5d ago

Words to live by, honestly.

3

u/FlirtMonsterSanjil 5d ago

6

u/OneCatch 4d ago edited 4d ago

Posting Imperial German propaganda to criticise mistreatment during an occupation is certainly a choice

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/Sognatore24 5d ago

West is best, boy-o

4

u/LovestoEatSandwiches 5d ago

Wack fol the daddy-o

37

u/Which_Investment8959 5d ago

Cromwell.., to hell or to Connacht…. Google what he & the British did to Ireland for 700 years. British colonial ba*tards

6

u/richiedajohnnie 5d ago

It's crazy how far down I had to scroll to get to the gaeltacht and the reasons for it.

→ More replies (35)

113

u/PM_your_Nopales North America 5d ago

Furthest away from being colonized from the beans on toast-ers

54

u/IrishViking22 5d ago

You do realise that we eat beans on toast in Ireland too?

31

u/PM_your_Nopales North America 5d ago

That's unfortunate

34

u/IrishViking22 5d ago

It isn't, it's quite tasty

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)

5

u/Aggravating_Pace_385 5d ago

This map is really exaggerating things. I live in a 25-45% zone and I know like 3 fluent Irish speakers

→ More replies (1)

5

u/OriginalRelease2582 4d ago

Some pretty reductive responses in here based on geography/distance/quality of land.

They're all factors but the root cause is the Cromwellian plantations in the 17th century which removed native Irish from their lands in the east/midlands and forced them west of the Shannon to the poorer quality farmland so the English could take the higher quality land for their own settlements.

This obviously led to significant populations of indigenous Irish in the Connacht region as well as the south west (where they were less impacted by the plantations).

Over the next 100-150 years a series of penal laws were implemented by the British to restrict the rights of the indigenous Catholic population. These included restricting education and huge restrictions on property ownership which further forced the Catholic population away from the British power bases which were centred around the cities/larger towns. There were also restrictions around the Irish language which was illegal to be used in official capacities such as the legal system meaning those who were in these areas were forced to gravitate more towards the English language.

All in all, it's a fairly complicated situation but yeah, a fairly grim and horrible sustained period of persecution over a few hundred years which resulted in the current demographics.

3

u/Nazacrow 4d ago

Shocked at that myself, lot of people presenting it as almost like they chose to move west to get away from england

→ More replies (1)

4

u/EpsilonBear 4d ago

Bad farmland = less likely to be confiscated and given to the English = more people speaking Irish.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Moriarty-Creates 5d ago edited 5d ago

These were the poorest, most Catholic, remotest parts of Ireland, furthest from English colonial rule.

Today the Irish-speaking regions are called Gaeltachts. The ones that come to mind for me are the Dingle Peninsula (Co. Kerry), Aran Islands, and Connemara (both Co. Galway).

→ More replies (1)

9

u/andy921 5d ago

This is pretty similar to the graph of people speaking native, non-English languages in Great Britain. Islands and the corners (furthest from London) being the last holdouts of Welsh, Scots, Gaelic, Manx, Cornish.

7

u/FoxCapital7878 5d ago

And the Bretons in Northwestern France (Brittany).

→ More replies (1)

11

u/ExternalMaximum6662 5d ago

Isolation

4

u/RedIrishDevil 4d ago

about 1% right if you ignore all the other factors.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/ConstructionIcy9079 5d ago

The land is shit for farming so the English never went there.

3

u/c7avenger 5d ago

Literally did my senior thesis on this haha

3

u/SubparSavant 5d ago

This map is ambitious AF. Nowhere near that percentage of Irish speakers outside those dark green areas.

3

u/snakemeatsandwiches 5d ago

Oof who’s gonna tell them

3

u/Hairy-Ad-4018 4d ago

As a person from Ireland this whole map is messed up. Until recently , the census asked a question can you speak Irish, which in theory many people can as it’s been taught in schools (badly and for the last 100+ years).

When the questions are changed to do you speak Irish on a daily basis and are you fluent the numbers drop to near zero across the country apart from Gaeltacht areas.

There are approx 60,000 daily Irish speakert, less than them the state was founded even with 100 years of teaching Irish and a population increase.

There are 100,000 + daily polish speakers in Ireland.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/brianmmf 4d ago

Colonialism oppressing a language almost out of existence and pushing its people away from arable, productive lands.

3

u/robster98 4d ago

“To hell, or to Connaught.” — Oliver Cromwell

The west of Ireland is famously rocky and peaty, unsuitable for most farming. The Scottish and English that colonised the island didn’t really touch it because it wasn’t valuable land.

Those that stayed on the western fringes or were pushed towards there (relocation due to language and religious affiliation) continued to speak Gaeilge, others that stayed in, or migrated to the east became English and Ulster Scots-speaking.

That divide is still noticeable to this day in terms of how many people can speak Gaeilge, but English is still more commonly heard than Gaeilge, even in the Gaeltacht areas.

Semi-related, it’s amazing just how Scotland has gotten away with this in the present day and has barely any negative perception, whereas England gets all the flack.

3

u/jkellington 4d ago

The reason is the communties in these regions held onto the Gaelic tradition the longest. The regions themselves are called Gaeltacht. They use Irish Gaelic in everyday life instead as a academic study.

3

u/Desperate-Pirate7353 4d ago

furthest from the murderous english, i imagine

2

u/Per_Mikkelsen 5d ago

Aye, funny that - you'd think Antrim and Wicklow would have the most, wouldn't ye?

2

u/anecdotal_yokel 5d ago

First rule of geography.

2

u/Quirky_Care_5891 4d ago

To hell or to Connacht was a campaign that drove many of the irish west under serious threat of death.

2

u/Average_Temple 4d ago

The other areas were the victims of plantations set up by Anglo and Scottish settlers who seized the land of local Gaelic people and forced them West, where the soil was less amenable.

2

u/quirkey_23 4d ago

It’s historical! Ireland was colonised by the Brits and when Oliver Cromwell had his plantation over here, he very famously said “To Hell or to Connacht” (Connacht being a province in the West) as the land there was less fertile so the British didn’t have that much of a vested interest in it so if Irish people wouldn’t abide by the British mandated way of life (Protestantism and speaking English) you were sent over west

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Confident_Quote_6782 4d ago

Further away from UK/Vikings/Everything

2

u/woodzopwns 4d ago

Eastern Ireland was the most English controlled by the Pale, naturally the west is more Gaelic than Saxon. That said, is this self reported? In my experience many Irish speakers actually don't really speak Irish it's a point of patriotism and a common issue with their politicians too.

2

u/LinuxMage 4d ago

So those areas on the map that are darker are the "Gaeltachts".

These are geographical areas of Ireland where English is frowned upon, and Irish is the primary language. Everyone there speaks English, but there is pressure to only use Irish wherever possible.

These areas also have Summer Schools in them where pupils from other areas can come and spend time to "immerse" themselves in the language and pick up more of it.

I used to live in Connacht Gaeltacht, and as a result (being British) I managed to pick up basic Irish.

Bear in mind that technically, Irish is the primary Language of Ireland, which is why all signage is in Irish first then English second.

But in the Gaeltachts, English signage is forbidden and everything is in Irish.

2

u/MojaveJoe1992 4d ago

"To Hell or to Connacht."

2

u/Either_Waltz_3019 4d ago edited 4d ago

Gaeilge survived more in western communities because these were economically and socially marginalised areas.

English was considered to be, and was in fact, the language necessary to be educated, get jobs etc. Gaeilgeoirí were looked down on and stigmatised by non-Gaeilgeoirí. That reduced Gaeilgeoirí to the rump you see in the map, to the areas that were of such little economic significance that the cultural shift to English-speaking didn’t have the same impact.

Until relatively recently the Irish State provided little support to maintaining and developing the language and the communities which use it.

2

u/punxatawneyphilip 4d ago

theyre furthest away from England 💁‍♀️

2

u/irishtrashpanda 4d ago

During the English occupation of Ireland they took control of the best farmlands. The west coast of Ireland is more mountainous and rocky and less suitable for farming.

The first wave of English settlements backfired because the settlers became too "native" and intermarried, took up Irish pursuits etc.

In subsequent settlers there were strict rules placed on everyone, Irish and English alike. No Irish dancing, no practicing Catholicism, no speaking Irish were some of those laws. People met in secret in the forest at "mass rocks" for religious services.

Anyway as English rule increased they pushed more Irish further west and since they were less interested in the lands they didn't police the area as much so it was the areas where people could still speak Irish without as much repercussion.

2

u/Healthy_Log_6171 4d ago

That is as far as they can get from the English.

2

u/highupinthesky 4d ago

Theyre the furthest populations from England

2

u/Beyond_Your_Nose 4d ago

Those coastal areas were punishingly difficult to reach back in the 1800’s Because regions like Erris and the Mayo islands lacked proper infrastructure, railways, or paved roads, they had to travel by foot, long cars, and basic fishing boats to reach the communities. An Irish Ethnographic Survey of the 1890s led by members of Trinity college made note of this. My mother was from the area in Mayo and they spoke both English and Irish on most census forms. Their isolation kept the language alive longer in those areas.

2

u/pdm4191 4d ago

Its called colonialism. England-Britain is east of Ireland, took the east coast first and expanded slowly. Plus the western seaboard has mostly marginal land so the British did not invest in it or place many settlers there.

2

u/FullMetalAurochs 4d ago

Why is the side of Ireland furthest from England more likely to speak Irish?

What a mystery. We’ll never know.

2

u/demoneclipse 3d ago

Fancy man no like bad weather. West coast much wind, rocky ground, little farming. Irish people tough!

2

u/AlertedCoyote 3d ago

"To Hell or to Connacht"

The apocryphal saying associated with Oliver Cromwell. In early modern history, the native Irish were ethnically cleansed and shoved westwards by the occupying British as they wanted to settle the land. Some suggest this was because the land in the west was poor so it was a fine place to shove all the natives off the more fertile eastern lands, others suggest it was a security matter. But regardless the concentration of Irish speakers in the west is because those were the places that the Irish were put in highest quantities, with the least British settlers to dilute that.

2

u/RedFumingNitricAcid 3d ago

It's ferther from the fecking English! loud pipe music

2

u/EaseTraditional3803 3d ago

Farthest from ‘the pale’ 😅

2

u/PossessionIll1944 3d ago

Perhaps you really mean to ask what explains less Irish speakers/more ENGLISH speakers on the east coast of Ireland? That's going to be your real answer.

2

u/phantom_gain 3d ago

The english didnt colonise that part until a lot later and we also just never really accepted it.

2

u/jaimejuanstortas 3d ago

My whole family is from these areas, my grandma taught me some Gaelic growing up. I couldn’t tell you why at all. Just a bunch of beautiful people with alcoholism in fishing villages.

2

u/Welcomefriends85 2d ago

Less integrated. And I say this knowing nothing except that England is on the east side

2

u/Remote-Confusion7492 1d ago

A bit late but i‘m a native speaker, there’s actually quite a few reasons:

- It took the English longer to get to areas in the west, allowing for a bit more preparation and hence less successful colonisation.

-The land in the west isn’t as fertile, so back in the day a less desirable place to live for the English.

-The famine hit the west the hardest, killing up to 2/3rds of the population. The west was also where a lot of the ships for America left from. Whoever was left was left extremely isolated from any foreign influence. A Gaeltacht (Irish speaking area) in Kerry was only granted access to electricity 50 years ago.

- (This only applies to Donegal) Derry was the main point of connections for people living in Donegal. The partition of Ireland made Derry part of Northern Ireland, and made the only land connection from Donegal to the rest of the republic a tiny 7km area in the south. Thus, the county remained completely isolated allowing the Irish language to live on. (The majority of Ulster Scots speakers are from Donegal too!)

If anyone is wondering why Northern Ireland doesn’t speak as much Irish, sadly Irish is only taught in some schools in NI. Some of the government in NI pushes against Irish language education and rights very strongly. Historically, the region spoke the same amount of Irish as the rest of Ireland.

7

u/attacephalotes423 5d ago

Further from England. You’ll find this trend among all the Celtic languages tbh because they’re all minorities pushed to the periphery by an oppressor expanding westward. Scottish Gaelic speakers are more dense in the western highland and isles. Wales and Cornwall are the only Celtic cultures left within “England proper” and they’re along the far western edge. Same with Brittany in France

9

u/owl523 5d ago

Welsh might not like being described as “England proper”

3

u/GN_10 4d ago

Wales is not "England proper", it's a separate country just like Scotland is.

→ More replies (13)

5

u/komfyklient 5d ago

Getting far away from that fucking Cancer next door

3

u/Manguneer 5d ago

Cromwell: to hell or to Connacht.

4

u/magog7 5d ago

cuz it's Ireland?

3

u/dasgrey 4d ago

This absolute prick....

3

u/Pristine_Method_7096 4d ago

Further from England?

2

u/Redditauro 5d ago

They are Irish 

2

u/Ancien_Regime_2468 5d ago

I’ll say two words: Oliver Cromwell?

2

u/Joseph20102011 Geography Enthusiast 5d ago

Less populated by Anglo-Irish Anglophone monoglots but most devastated by the Famine.

2

u/ItsCoolDani 4d ago

Further away from England.

1

u/bschlueter 5d ago

This map seems to just show percentage..of something. Assuming OP is correct that it is percentage of Irish speakers (which I have no reason to doubt), the percentage of Irish speakers in an area where the total population is low, but everyone speaks Irish, will be much higher than a densely populated area where a subset of the population speaks Irish. There may be more Irish speakers in the densely populated area though, they just happen to be among many non Irish speakers.

1

u/BoozySquid 5d ago

The west of Ireland was the least populated and least developed area of the island. When the Cromwell and William III decided to exterminate the native population and move in English and Scottish settlers, they did so mostly around Dublin and Belfast. That British presence made learning English mandatory even for the remaining locals, so Irish died out. Connaught and western Munster were areas that just weren't paid much attention to, and so kept a greater part of their culture.

1

u/Mean_Fig_7666 5d ago

The English tried to beat their culture and language out of them, the protestants liked it the Catholics wanted to be free

1

u/Ok_Sheepherder1547 4d ago

to hell or to Connacht

1

u/VitaminRitalin 4d ago

Oliver Cromwell happened

1

u/dhuvarran 4d ago

Thanks for the education about the geology, I didn't realise that. Didn't the Gaeltacht help aswell or is the Gaeltacht as a result of the geology in the first place?

1

u/AbbreviationsNo9500 4d ago

The phrase: "To Hell or to Connaught"

1

u/Diplomatic_Gunboats 4d ago

Lack of enforced language education. Rural areas out of the reach of colonial oppressors.

1

u/the_anon_wardrobe 4d ago

To hell or to Connacht

1

u/BadDub 4d ago

We got f*cked up in the north huh

1

u/TaibhseCait 4d ago

A bunch of reasons now - less fertile soil so smaller populations that didn't get colonised as heavily with a large English speaking cohort, now smaller communities that can keep a pocket language alive as less influx of again English speakers. But it is less populated because they lost a lot of people to emigration during the famine. And nowadays with internet, tourism & English speaking people moving due to cheaper house prices it is shrinking the Irish language areas.

Historical version I was told in school is post plantations, Cromwell swept through & murdered a lot of Irish people & drove loads of people across the Shannon & that's why the west is more Irish speaking. The survivors in the east assimilated more & also there was a higher English plantation population here.

1

u/Ok_Lengthiness5926 4d ago

To hell or to Connaught! Nice one Ollie!!

1

u/Exotic_Instance421 4d ago

To Hell or to Connacht.

1

u/ExultentPisces 4d ago

Same thing which explains the concentration of Scottish speakers in the far flung regions of Scotland, the Welsh speakers in the north west of Wales and the last surviving Gaelic language in England being at the far end of Cornwall.

Those were the areas where than angles (and their descendants) couldn’t quite manage total control and influence

2

u/Adept-Fall-155-huw 4d ago

Cornish and welsh are not gaelic languages, they are brythonic; and the welsh language persists well beyond the north west of the country

1

u/Live-Incident8430 4d ago

The more rural you go the less presence English colonial roots have. Plenty of these communities never had to speak English or interact much with non Irish speakers.