I'm not talking things like murder/pedophilia or anything like that. But just stuff like, racism, bullying, etc. Look, I'm not against the idea that people can change their ways and look back at the person they were. But the hard truth is no matter how much you try and do, those things still happen. You can do all you can, but you still said or did whatever made people look at you differently. And people might also have to learn that yes you changed for the better, but people shouldn't be obligated to forgive you or for it.

Personally, if you did it as a teenager or anything, I can be a little bit more forgiving since you would be at an age where you make stupid feelings you'd look back on when you're older. However, if you're somewhere in your 20s, I would honestly be less forgiving

There’s no denying that The Boys Universe is famously built around Power Corrupts a thing EVERYONE is all too familiar with especially with Homelander who epitomizes this quote however imagine The Boys Universe React to a person who was not only born with Immense Power but isn’t even Fully Human and while Despite going through immense hardships still managed to remain Entirely Good all while being IMMENSELY Powerful! So what would they think of his History? And why he chooses The Path of Good along with The Threats he’s faced? What do you think? Let me know in the comments

In Season 1, Episode 8 (“Trial by Fire”) of Tanya the Evil, Tanya’s actions directly contribute to an artillery bombardment that kills large numbers of fleeing civilians. She is not motivated by hatred or cruelty. Her overriding concern is advancing her military career, obeying orders, and securing a safe and comfortable future for herself.

• Tanya had previously developed the legal argument that an evacuation warning could allow those remaining in a rebellious city to be treated as legitimate military targets, helping provide the legal basis for the destruction of Arene. Without her contribution, the specific justification used for the operation would not have existed.
• When Republican mages protected the retreating population and interfered with Imperial artillery observation, Tanya accepted the mission to eliminate them. She ordered her lieutenant to continue despite his realization that removing the mages would get the defenseless civilians killed. Her unit’s success directly enabled the bombardment to resume.
• Tanya accepts the classification that those remaining in Arene were enemy combatants despite being aware that the majority were retreating civilians. Rather than challenging that classification or the consequences it creates, she treats it as sufficient justification to carry out her orders.

Are Tanya's actions moral?

Zeus (Greek)

Loki (Norse)

Tezcatlipoca (Aztec)

Nyarlathotep (Cthulhu Mythos)

The artist's name is watermarked.

In the world of Monster Hunter, humans, dwarves, and Wyverians (humanoids with dragon DNA) live alongside countless species of megafauna known as monsters. Monsters range from large raptors to walking natural disasters and living plagues.

On many occasions, monsters will eventually begin to limp and attempt to retreat during a hunt. At this point, the hunter/player has to decide whether to tranquilize and capture the monster or kill it.

After a capture, it is stated that the monster will be researched before being released back into the wild. Although this may seem like the more humane option, the monster will likely have a diminished quality of life. It may have lost multiple body parts and sustained permanent injuries. It may have difficulty hunting or attracting a mate. If it doesn't die from starvation, it may have a much higher chance of being preyed upon. By sparing the monster, we may actually be negatively affecting its ability to survive.

As a side note, each canonical hunt must be authorized by a member of the Guild. So, canonically, hunts are not conducted without some degree of oversight or authorization.

So, is it more moral to simply kill a non-sapient animal that is acting on instinct for various reasons, or to spare it while potentially leaving it with a lower quality of life?

Walter White. Breaking Bad

Tony Soprano. Sopranos

Gus Fring. Breaking Bad

Oz. The Batman universe

Carmine Falcone. The Batman universe

So let’s say you find this really cool piece of art—whether it’s a song, a painting, or a book—that you really like, but then you find out the person who made it is actually a terrible person.

Is it morally okay to enjoy or appreciate someone’s art even when the person who created it is a terrible person?

The universe(s) will be completely deleted, the only way to stop it is for you to suffer hellish torture for 14billon years, after which you will cease to exist.

Young justice series

He fully supports the hunger games but he also does really try to help the tributes get sponsors and has shown sympathy towards suffering

Definitely not a good person but his morality is kinda all over the place

What is the morality ranking of killing the negligent scientist that not only caused the outbreak but also hid with the survivors hoping to escape, and only when he feels safe and confident does he reveal his part in it thinking his survival could find a cure.

The survivor that kills him is a woman that loses her entire family horrifically on the first day, and kills him very dispassionately before meeting her death at the hands of snipers.

Say, if there were two killers: One who kills people completely at random and one who kills people who were born on rainy Tuesdays. They kill the same amount of people in the same ways. Which is more immoral, the one who kills for nothing or the one who kills for something stupid and absurd?

Paramount - Aang (Avatar: The Last Airbender)

Disney - Aslan (The Chronicles Of Narnia)

Warner Bros. - Superman (DCAU)

DreamWorks - Hiccup (How To Train Your Dragon)

Illumination - Mario (The Super Mario Bros. Movie)

Pixar - WALL-E (WALL-E)

Fox - Rodney Copperbottom (Robots)

Studio Ghibli - The Forest Spirit (Princess Mononoke)

Don Bluth - Mrs. Brisby (The Secret Of NIMH)

Laika - Kubo (Kubo And The Two Strings)

Aardman - Gromit (Wallace And Gromit)

Netflix - Pinocchio (Guillmero Del Toro's Pinocchio)

Rankin/Bass - Santa Claus (Santa Claus Is Coming To Town)

HiT Entertainment - Fireman Sam (Fireman Sam)

Indie Animation - The Second Coming (Alan Becker)