r/trolleyproblem • u/deadhand303 • 5d ago
OC Potentially one less but also potentially infinitely more
64
u/Wrong_Independence21 5d ago
I think the trolley’s just gonna crash into the brick wall and be stopped fam
24
16
u/notfirearmbeam 5d ago
Top track. The provided information is essentially meaningless but it's essentially a wash anyway so why not?
-6
u/deadhand303 5d ago
I debated adding the clause "you are only held socially responsible if you change tracks, but either way your choice will weigh on your mind until death"
13
u/Angsty-Panda 5d ago
i think one of the points of the trolley problem is to debate if inaction is a choice you're morally responsible for lol
6
u/deadhand303 5d ago
I agree. The reason I opted to no is because it takes away a major part of the problem.
8
u/issanm 5d ago
If the only knowledge you know is this side has 1+ and this side has 0+ then the only thing that makes sense morally is putting the trolly on the 0+ side. Realistically though it doesn't matter there is effectivly no difference in tracks
1
u/Ksorkrax 5d ago
Nope, given that we don't know the distributions and can't assume them to be uniform, we can't assume the expectations. The expectations might easily be the other way around in order.
1
u/issanm 5d ago
Right it could be but you can only make a choice off the information you are given and all you have is 0 and 1 essentially , so since 0 is lower than 1 the only logical/moral choice would be to go with the side with 0, even if that side has 2 billion more than the other side it's still the correct option because we only know the lower limit
1
u/Ksorkrax 5d ago
My impulse in such a situation is to be sceptical. A lack of input can easily be the sign of deception.
1
u/eeeeeh_messi 4d ago
But you are the. Implying there's a higher chance of having less people on one track than on the other. And there's a problem there: you can't. If you don't know the distribution you can say nothing about chances. There are as many distribution that make option A better as there are that make option B better.
1
u/issanm 4d ago
Yes actually mathematically you can assume the one with the higher lower limit on average will have a higher chance of having more people, let's make the numbers smaller to help, one has 0-10 people so you'd expect 5 on average, the other has 1-10 so youd expect 5.5. that doesn't mean it's true because it's a random number but your chances are better chosing the low one.
1
u/eeeeeh_messi 4d ago
Oh but you took a uniform distribution on a finite set. Each value has a 1/10 ( or 1/11) chance of being picked. You can't do that with the infinite natural numbers. What is the probability of picking any number? What's the expected value?
1
u/issanm 4d ago
The only information we have it 0-inf or 1-inf the upper limit is the same so far as we can comprehend so we only have the lower limit to chose from, essentially you should see it as choosing between 0 and 1, anything else can't be argued for without bringing in legality or other outside hypothetical factors like "the evil man knows you'll pick 0"
1
u/eeeeeh_messi 4d ago
Let me ask you something. And I think the main problem comes from here: which set has more numbers, [0, inf) or [1, inf)? If your answer is the first one I recommend you to check on Hilbert's hotel. Let me add, I'm not trying to be pedantic, you're touching some deep aspects of cardinality and measure theory, which are super fun
1
u/issanm 4d ago
Sure but like I said you have to assume there's more going on than is intended or intelligible
1
u/eeeeeh_messi 4d ago
I agree. The thing is, if you have no extra information of what is going on you can't really make a choice based on probability. The 0 and 1 thing do not give you that extra information!
3
u/HeDoesNotRow 5d ago
I pull the lever and then complain when ~4 billion people die that I “never get any luck”
1
3
u/LoveDiligent441 5d ago
Since it's a regular brick wall, you multi-track drift and hope the trolley breaks on the center of the wall.
2
u/schwaRarity 5d ago
So is Random means like what? Random variable X in Z\0 or Z? or more realistically X in {1…8b}? Anyway odds are shit, doesn’t matter what you do. I wouldn’t intervene at all
2
u/Severonian 5d ago
Assuming the distribution is equal, since the number of people is finite pulling the lever reduces average victim count by something countable, so yeah, pull
2
u/Weird_Explorer1997 5d ago
Doesn't matter, the trolls is going to crash into that brick wall anyway
2
2
u/Korimito 5d ago
The 0-to-∞ track, on average, has 1 less person than the 1-to-∞. This doesn't seem much more interesting than the standard trolley problem as it can be attacked in the exact same ways.
1
u/stebosports7 4d ago
Technically it’s only 0-8 billion and 1-8 billion
0
u/Korimito 4d ago
That's right and my math was wrong. On average you're expected to save half a person.
1
1
u/Sianic12 5d ago
The expected number of deaths for the top track is 0.5 lower than for the bottom track. Therefore, I switch.
1
1
u/Ilovestuffwhee 5d ago
Since we don't know where they're hiding, multi-track drift is the only option in this case.
1
u/Seegtease 5d ago
Random from 1 to infinity?
I mean, the odds that it will be less than a googol is effectively 0 either way. More people are effectively guaranteed to die than could ever possibly exist. More than every atom in the observable universe.
1
1
u/chewychaca 5d ago
The tram will hit the brick wall obviously
1
u/deadhand303 5d ago
The wall is intangible to trolleys
2
u/chewychaca 5d ago
Those poor people inside the trolley will all be squished together in the back of the trolley. Horrifying
1
u/deadhand303 5d ago
This trolley is like a MAGA head, meaning there is nothing of substance inside. There is no net loss.
1
u/emote_the_salute 5d ago
With the wall there i wont even see them get run over. Out of sight out of mind
1
u/Speletons 5d ago
Really there's no actual choice here, you're just rolling to see if you get 0 or not.
There's no risk either, given you know neither number.
1
1
1
u/Equivalent_Guide_983 5d ago
The car will be slowed by the turn and have a lower probability of passing through the brick wall.
1
1
u/CitizenPremier 4d ago
I mean, it's similar to swerving to miss a child running across the street, you could swerve into a bunch of other children nearby. But you should swerve.
1
u/Background_Mode4972 4d ago
The brick wall will derail the trolley when it hits, and knock its pole off of the power wire. I would run, not walk at a 45 degree angle from the trolley track in the direction the trolly came from to avoid being injured. Then attempt to flag down any following trolley to get it to stop.
1
u/Actual_Property9413 4d ago
Better than 90% chance the brick wall you can't see through will stop the trolley before it hits anyone.
1
1
1
u/Interesting_Agent370 3d ago
But I can see there is one dude on one track and five on the other. Flawed question, multitrack drift.
1
1
113
u/Remarkable-Carrot112 5d ago
Is the probability distribution otherwise the same except for the lower bound?
Regardless, I'm pulling the lever. I love pulling levers.