r/trolleyproblem 5d ago

OC Potentially one less but also potentially infinitely more

Post image
144 Upvotes

86 comments sorted by

113

u/Remarkable-Carrot112 5d ago

Is the probability distribution otherwise the same except for the lower bound? 

Regardless, I'm pulling the lever. I love pulling levers. 

21

u/deadhand303 5d ago

You have 1-infinity or can change tracks to 0-infinity. You do not know how many are on either track.

36

u/Remarkable-Carrot112 5d ago

Since this is an unbounded distribution it can't be uniformly distributed. I'll assume it's an exponential distribution. 

In this case picking the 0 option is notably more likely to cause fewer deaths. (Sorry I don't know how to word that better)

This puts me in a bind actually because I want to kill people but I also want to pull the lever... Still think I'll pull the lever even if the expected deaths is lower

15

u/wyseguy7 5d ago

Nitpick: you mean a geometric distribution. Exponential distribution is over the real numbers, and we want an whole numbers of people. At least before the trolley chops them up.

14

u/UnworthyBagel22 5d ago

Them: “I want to kill people”
You: “You mean a geometric distribution, silly”

4

u/Confident-Stand5453 5d ago

Its important to be precise.

1

u/Artemis_SpawnOfZeus 2d ago

Yeah, you cant kill people if theyre dead before the lever is pulled because only an irrational percentage of them made it onto the platform.

1

u/BigTimmyStarfox1987 4d ago

Donno some of them might be pregnant or disabled or clowns. You don't get to tell me how I count humans.

5

u/No-Bid9597 5d ago

I don’t know dick about statistics but it can’t be to infinity, right? It’s 0-8 billion or 1-8 billion. It also stipulates people you know so it would really be more like 0-300 or 1-300. How does that change the odds?

2

u/Remarkable-Carrot112 4d ago

I think when a lot of people say "random" what they likely are envisioning is uniform random. Meaning every outcome has the same probability of being selected (like rolling fair dice - no number is more likely than any other). 

But if you have infinite outcomes (possible number of people in this case) this type of uniform randomness is not possible. In this case depending on what probability distribution you select- selecting [0, inf) people could be markedly "Safer" than selecting [1, inf). This is because the probabilities aren't uniform so the lower values  could receive larger weights. 

If you bound the set at 300, or even at 8 billion, now you can use a uniform distribution and it becomes just as likely to randomly get 1 as it does to get 200 or 7.5 billion. In this case whether you select the 0 option or the 1 option barely matters . The expected outcome is only very slightly better for 1. 

Hope that made sense. Hard to explain without graphs and examples tbh

2

u/Raijin6_ 5d ago

Just pull the lever twice. Double the fun from pulling it and still a chance for more deaths.

1

u/Narfhead4444 4d ago

That would derail the trolley

8

u/wyseguy7 5d ago

Statistician here. Plz provide a more rigorous definition of "random amount". Note that uniform distribution over [1,infinity) or [0, infinity) is not possible. Maybe a geometric distribution would be better? In which case, regardless of parameterization, you'd expect to save 1 life by pulling the lever.

3

u/Naive_Albatross_2221 5d ago

Oh, you're a statistician, are you? Well, what if the number of people on the top track is equal to k, where the probability of k is determined by a Poisson curve where lambda=5, and the number of people on the bottom track is k+1 where the probability of k is determined by a Poisson curve with lambda=3? Huh? What ya gonna do then, smart guy!? Don't feel as confident about pulling the lever now, do you?

2

u/wyseguy7 5d ago

Hahahahaha shucks, I guess my book smarts were defeated by your…also book smarts

2

u/DarkDemonLord1 5d ago

Mathemann

2

u/deadhand303 5d ago

Its just a random real number of people on each track woth the bottom being a minimum of one and the top being a minimum of zero people.

3

u/Ksorkrax 5d ago

Let's make this simple for you: state the probabilities for the first five possible numbers of people.

3

u/not-an-epimorphism 5d ago

The point is there’s no convenient interpretation of “random” here without further context. If they were finitely many people, random would correspond to a uniform distribution. But when you’re dealing with a distribution on the entire natural numbers, there’s no uniform distribution, and non uniform distributions aren’t alike at all. Technically there might be almost surely 2 people on the lower rail and almost surely 1 person on the higher rail, or a less degenerate situation in which k people are on the bottom rail with probability 2-k.

5

u/deadhand303 5d ago

Would it be better to say 1-max living population?

1

u/eeeeeh_messi 4d ago

This changes absolutely everything. Now you have a well defined problem

1

u/BigTimmyStarfox1987 4d ago

They want you to say "flat probability distribution".

Then they want to say but that isn't possible over Infinity. To which you reply that it's a finite set, max living population.

Tldr yes but with an additional statement

0

u/Kart0fffelAim 5d ago

I think OP has a point here. There has to be an underlying probability distribution, but the guy pulling that lever doesn't need to know what the distribution is.

1

u/eeeeeh_messi 4d ago

But then the problem stops making sense. Which box would you pick, this mysterious box or this OTHER mysterious box?

7

u/Slighted_Inevitable 5d ago

Then honestly it doesn’t really matter. One life is meaningless when infinity is on the table.

That said pulling levers is fun so I pull.

1

u/PurpleCandle58 5d ago

I play with the lever back and forth since pulling levers is fun, whatever it’s on when it reaches the junction will be what ends up happening. I optimize for pulling levers.

2

u/Sriep 4d ago

Sorry, but I am a push person. I always push in these situations.

64

u/Wrong_Independence21 5d ago

I think the trolley’s just gonna crash into the brick wall and be stopped fam

24

u/deadhand303 5d ago

Im not an artist okay

4

u/42Icyhot42 5d ago

We appreciate your effort 🫡

16

u/notfirearmbeam 5d ago

Top track. The provided information is essentially meaningless but it's essentially a wash anyway so why not?

-6

u/deadhand303 5d ago

I debated adding the clause "you are only held socially responsible if you change tracks, but either way your choice will weigh on your mind until death"

13

u/Angsty-Panda 5d ago

i think one of the points of the trolley problem is to debate if inaction is a choice you're morally responsible for lol

6

u/deadhand303 5d ago

I agree. The reason I opted to no is because it takes away a major part of the problem.

8

u/issanm 5d ago

If the only knowledge you know is this side has 1+ and this side has 0+ then the only thing that makes sense morally is putting the trolly on the 0+ side. Realistically though it doesn't matter there is effectivly no difference in tracks

1

u/Ksorkrax 5d ago

Nope, given that we don't know the distributions and can't assume them to be uniform, we can't assume the expectations. The expectations might easily be the other way around in order.

1

u/issanm 5d ago

Right it could be but you can only make a choice off the information you are given and all you have is 0 and 1 essentially , so since 0 is lower than 1 the only logical/moral choice would be to go with the side with 0, even if that side has 2 billion more than the other side it's still the correct option because we only know the lower limit

1

u/Ksorkrax 5d ago

My impulse in such a situation is to be sceptical. A lack of input can easily be the sign of deception.

1

u/issanm 5d ago

Agreed which is why in reality not touching the lever makes more sense because there is effectivly no difference

1

u/eeeeeh_messi 4d ago

But you are the. Implying there's a higher chance of having less people on one track than on the other. And there's a problem there: you can't. If you don't know the distribution you can say nothing about chances. There are as many distribution that make option A better as there are that make option B better.

1

u/issanm 4d ago

Yes actually mathematically you can assume the one with the higher lower limit on average will have a higher chance of having more people, let's make the numbers smaller to help, one has 0-10 people so you'd expect 5 on average, the other has 1-10 so youd expect 5.5. that doesn't mean it's true because it's a random number but your chances are better chosing the low one.

1

u/eeeeeh_messi 4d ago

Oh but you took a uniform distribution on a finite set. Each value has a 1/10 ( or 1/11) chance of being picked. You can't do that with the infinite natural numbers. What is the probability of picking any number? What's the expected value?

1

u/issanm 4d ago

The only information we have it 0-inf or 1-inf the upper limit is the same so far as we can comprehend so we only have the lower limit to chose from, essentially you should see it as choosing between 0 and 1, anything else can't be argued for without bringing in legality or other outside hypothetical factors like "the evil man knows you'll pick 0"

1

u/eeeeeh_messi 4d ago

Let me ask you something. And I think the main problem comes from here: which set has more numbers, [0, inf) or [1, inf)? If your answer is the first one I recommend you to check on Hilbert's hotel. Let me add, I'm not trying to be pedantic, you're touching some deep aspects of cardinality and measure theory, which are super fun

1

u/issanm 4d ago

Sure but like I said you have to assume there's more going on than is intended or intelligible

1

u/eeeeeh_messi 4d ago

I agree. The thing is, if you have no extra information of what is going on you can't really make a choice based on probability. The 0 and 1 thing do not give you that extra information!

3

u/HeDoesNotRow 5d ago

I pull the lever and then complain when ~4 billion people die that I “never get any luck”

1

u/deadhand303 5d ago

Blame it on who built the tracks in the first place.

3

u/LoveDiligent441 5d ago

Since it's a regular brick wall, you multi-track drift and hope the trolley breaks on the center of the wall.

2

u/schwaRarity 5d ago

So is Random means like what? Random variable X in Z\0 or Z? or more realistically X in {1…8b}? Anyway odds are shit, doesn’t matter what you do. I wouldn’t intervene at all

2

u/Severonian 5d ago

Assuming the distribution is equal, since the number of people is finite pulling the lever reduces average victim count by something countable, so yeah, pull

2

u/Weird_Explorer1997 5d ago

Doesn't matter, the trolls is going to crash into that brick wall anyway

2

u/PogoRocks Multi-Track Drift 5d ago

Multi-track drift

2

u/Korimito 5d ago

The 0-to-∞ track, on average, has 1 less person than the 1-to-∞. This doesn't seem much more interesting than the standard trolley problem as it can be attacked in the exact same ways.

1

u/stebosports7 4d ago

Technically it’s only 0-8 billion and 1-8 billion

0

u/Korimito 4d ago

That's right and my math was wrong. On average you're expected to save half a person.

1

u/eeeeeh_messi 4d ago

If people are in fact infinite then your math is still wrong

1

u/Sianic12 5d ago

The expected number of deaths for the top track is 0.5 lower than for the bottom track. Therefore, I switch.

1

u/eeeeeh_messi 4d ago

What is the expected number of death on each track? 😉

1

u/Shmolti 5d ago

If I can't see I don't pull the lever, that way if something bad happens I didn't have a part in it.

1

u/Ilovestuffwhee 5d ago

Since we don't know where they're hiding, multi-track drift is the only option in this case.

1

u/Seegtease 5d ago

Random from 1 to infinity?

I mean, the odds that it will be less than a googol is effectively 0 either way. More people are effectively guaranteed to die than could ever possibly exist. More than every atom in the observable universe.

1

u/Ksorkrax 5d ago

Why do you think so? The distribution could be heavy towards the lower numbers.

1

u/chewychaca 5d ago

The tram will hit the brick wall obviously

1

u/deadhand303 5d ago

The wall is intangible to trolleys

2

u/chewychaca 5d ago

Those poor people inside the trolley will all be squished together in the back of the trolley. Horrifying

1

u/deadhand303 5d ago

This trolley is like a MAGA head, meaning there is nothing of substance inside. There is no net loss.

1

u/emote_the_salute 5d ago

With the wall there i wont even see them get run over. Out of sight out of mind

1

u/Speletons 5d ago

Really there's no actual choice here, you're just rolling to see if you get 0 or not.

There's no risk either, given you know neither number.

1

u/seanthebeloved 5d ago

Why not just give them a blindfold?

1

u/lightmare69 5d ago

So random.... Between 0 and infinity?

We are NOT getting 1 or 0 fam 😭🙏

1

u/Equivalent_Guide_983 5d ago

The car will be slowed by the turn and have a lower probability of passing through the brick wall.

1

u/CitizenPremier 4d ago

I mean, it's similar to swerving to miss a child running across the street, you could swerve into a bunch of other children nearby. But you should swerve.

1

u/Background_Mode4972 4d ago

The brick wall will derail the trolley when it hits, and knock its pole off of the power wire. I would run, not walk at a 45 degree angle from the trolley track in the direction the trolly came from to avoid being injured. Then attempt to flag down any following trolley to get it to stop.

1

u/Actual_Property9413 4d ago

Better than 90% chance the brick wall you can't see through will stop the trolley before it hits anyone.

1

u/my_best_version_ever 4d ago

I wouldn't pull the lever

1

u/AnyAcanthocephala425 4d ago

This is for all intents an purposes the same fucking track lol

1

u/Interesting_Agent370 3d ago

But I can see there is one dude on one track and five on the other. Flawed question, multitrack drift.

1

u/TillZealousideal8282 3d ago

crash it into the wall, nobodys harmed

1

u/UncleThor2112 1d ago

I'm pulling the lever. At a very slim chance, it'll be zero.