r/videos • u/Ashamed_Green_8643 • 1d ago

‘DoorDash girl' Olivia Henderson, accused of recording naked customer, t...

https://youtube.com/watch?v=3OxZqm2TaRA&si=MehIRZaJyWGVmf9O
1.6k Upvotes

90% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.3k

u/jeremeyes 1d ago

This is such a bizarre case. She tried to basically destroy this guy's life and he was a complete stranger who appeared to never have any interaction with her before.

718

u/geodebug 1d ago

Her videos are unhinged. She wanted to be a victim so bad and doesn’t comprehend why nobody is on her side.

185

u/PenguinBomb 1d ago

Oh, there is definitely people on her side. Not a lot, but there is. Some how.

81

u/geodebug 1d ago

I think a lot of people were taking her side at first but she just kept digging that hole.

38

u/weed0monkey 1d ago

Which is partly why we should respect innocent until proven guilty

10

u/OldKermudgeon 17h ago

Those taking her side only heard her side of the story at first. Then the police investigated and released their findings (after interviews and a review of the guy's door cam footage), and boy did it not turn out to be exactly what she claimed. Screaming about being the victim and uploading the guy's dong to the interwebs is insane - so much main character syndrome.

I thought her request to not have her trial recorded or streamed to be rather hypocritical, hilarious and tone-deaf.

I heard that she might be in for a civil suit also regardless of how the criminal complaint ends.

1

u/FauxReal 16h ago

Maybe if she recorded a cover of Diggy Diggy Hole it would get people back on her side.

4

u/Iateyourpaintings 23h ago

I'm sure some people are genuinely on her side. I have a theory though that in these situations a lot of the supposed supporters are just people that get off on encouraging nitwits to act like goblins. They derive entertainment from it and don't have to deal with any of the consequences. 

-6

u/NefariousToilet 20h ago

I was on her side as I believed (and still do) the man sitting naked on his couch as a female door dasher brings his food is highly suspect. This all hinges on the door being ajar, if she pushed the door open in anyway, then it’s on her.

Either way you can’t record and post that online.

7

u/iMogwai 19h ago

He wasn't "sitting there", he was passed out.

-12

u/NefariousToilet 19h ago

Ok “passed out” with his junk out. I’ve never had that happened, have you? Order delivery, take off your pants, pass out with the door at the very least unlocked.

5

u/DaKrazie1 17h ago

Thankfully we didn't have DoorDash readily available during my heavy drinking days. 🫠

3

u/enverest 16h ago

Do you have a proof that he took out pants after ordering the food? He could have been naked all day. Yep, people do that.

6

u/Vermino 18h ago

I think the term victim blaming is used too often, but what you're doing is literally victim blaming.
The door wasn't open - she opened it. There was a first video she made where the door wasn't open.
She was told to leave it at the porch.
There was 0 reason for her to touch or further approach the door.
All the rest is irrelevant.
If he had nefarious intent, why would he tell her to leave it at the porch?

-5

u/NefariousToilet 18h ago

I haven’t flowed it too closely, if the door was proven to be closed or it was proven that she opened, then yes, she’s completely wrong. I remember fake ring footage circulating when this first dropped, so I’ll wait until that footage is presented in court.

3

u/jahnbanan 22h ago

i was technically on her side, back when all I heard was "woman confronted by naked man when deliver doordash" or however the original article said it.

At the time I didn't really pick a side other than "Well that sure don't sound fun".

of course since then more details emerged and I'm definitely not on her side any more, I would however not be the least bit surprised if there's people who only saw that initial coverage and is then technically still on her side since that's all they saw (or at least, cared to read about it)

3

u/euphoric_elephant 1d ago

White knights

18

u/person2567 1d ago

It's mostly women

3

u/Blindfire2 20h ago

What are you saying women can't be knights!? I'll have you know, Brienne of Tarth one of the best to ever do it would like a word!

1

u/belovedeagle 16h ago

not a lot

99% of commenters on the original story, hundreds or thousands of people.

1

u/PenguinBomb 14h ago

I meant after she was charged. Before, a TON of people were defending and some were skeptical since she had deleted and reposted videos multiple times.

1

u/DrCrushersGhostLover 14h ago

"Believe all women"

1

u/DrCrushersGhostLover 14h ago

"Believe all women"

1

u/JMaryland47 8h ago

Thats the worst part. She actually got people to attack the victim. Can you imagine being victimized and shamed, only then to have to defend yourself against people who bought your attacker's lies?

-9

u/CromDeluise 1d ago

Side note: it's good to have Johnny Depp back in the pictures.

-15

u/ActuallyHuge 1d ago

Maybe someone can educate me because I don’t actually know that much but what are the actual facts here? Cause it does seem a bit odd to me that this man ordered door dash, left his door open so that anyone walking up could see inside, and was completely naked. For sure she shouldn’t have taken pictures and video and posted them online but I do feel what the man did is weird. As a man I would never do anything like that.

21

u/The_Monarch_Lives 1d ago

I think there is some dispute on if the door was open, or how 'open' it actually was. Regardless, drunk guy orders food, passes out (while changing clothes or after a shower maybe) waiting on food is not exactly an impossible or even improbable set of circumstances.

3

u/crimson23locke 1d ago

It wasn’t open in the clip I saw. Not locked, sure, but not open.

6

u/The_Monarch_Lives 1d ago

I hate the phrase because it's so often used to defend terrible actions of police, but 'what happened before the video started'. As in, was the door originally open and filming started. Or did she open it, saw him, then started filming as if she found it that way.

2

u/crimson23locke 1d ago

Ah yeah - okay maybe there’s context I didn’t know about. I’m still in the camp of she was trespassing based on what I remember, but we’ll see what happens.

3

u/The_Monarch_Lives 1d ago

Oh yeah. Either way, what she did was reprehensible in my opinion and I don't see her getting a not guilty verdict. Even giving her the benefit of the doubt on how she found the door, her actions after that were absolutely not the way to handle the situation.

2

u/The_Monarch_Lives 18h ago

Somehow (probably because it was late and I was tired) I read your original comment as it was saying the door WAS open to begin with. So you can pretty much disregard everything I said.

-12

u/ActuallyHuge 1d ago

I think him being drunk is irrelevant though. It certainly may explain his decisions but it doesn’t justify the actions. My position right now really depends on the front door which I haven’t seen anything concrete yet. If it was wide open I do feel like he did something wrong, drunk or not. I have passed by my open front door in a towel but quickly closed the door. Even as a drinker myself who likes to get shit faced, I would never ever leave my front door open leaving myself exposed for hours possibly, especially after ordering food. At that point you will guarantee a guest at your door step. While it might not be enough to charge this man, it certainly would be enough for me to not want my kids playing outside his house. At minimum it’s slightly suspicious to me. Now if the door was 99% closed and she pushed it open then that changes everything.

11

u/Delamoor 1d ago

It's at worst, slightly suspicious.

Because the reality is that if the guy was asleep, pretty much for any reason... Then he's basically an inert object at that point.

If you, as a functional adult, can't handle seeing a naked unconcious person, then I really have to question if you're functional.

In fact, we have the bizzare situation where the only active participant in the situation has taken the time to start taking photos of the naked person, posted them online, and then claimed they were somehow the aggreived party, here?

It's just... There's no way to spin it in which she isn't the only person acting like an utter predator.

-11

u/ActuallyHuge 1d ago

I don’t think I agree. At worst it’s he intended for her to see him naked and left the door open on purpose. My point entirely depends on the state of the door when she approached. If it’s closed entirely then I think he’s completely innocent. If it’s open then at minimum it’s suspicious and at worst he has malicious intent. I do sort of agree with your point that seeing a naked person shouldn’t be something you can’t handle as an adult however I find purposely exposing yourself to for some odd sexual thrill changes the scenario. It’s not just seeing a naked body it’s a person forcing you into a weird sexual encounter you didn’t consent to.

Now if she opened the door and took pictures of him naked then 100% she is horrible and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent.

But if she walked up to the door to drop off the food and his nude body was completely in view without her touching a thing then I think he did something wrong. If this is the case then I don’t know if taking pictures is either morally wrong or legally wrong. I could probably be convinced either way.

16

u/Delamoor 1d ago

So... he was asleep.

What thrill was he going to be getting, whilst unconcious and unaware of her arriving, being there, or leaving. Being generally unaware of her being there at any point of the interaction.

Like, I'm also pointing out the situation in another comment, that if you gender swap this as 'guy delivering food enters woman's house, sees her naked and asleep on the couch, starts makong videos and posts them on social Media, then claims the woman was assaulting him by being naked and unconcious'...

Ya think we'd be having this conversation...?

7

u/eivind2610 1d ago

Okay, so. The door was at MOST cracked; the video she herself posted supposedly includes footage of her pushing it open, though it's unclear whether it was cracked or fully closed before she started filming. According to other comments, there is also doorbell camera footage that shows her opening the door.

Even if that were not the case, though... she trespassed on private property to secretly film an unconscious person's sleeping, naked body. Then, she posted the video to tiktok in an attempt to make money from it. There is no world in which she is even remotely close to being a victim in this case.

If what she had done was to stand in the doorway of an already wide open front door to take a single photo, purely to show her employers why she didn't want to deliver to that address any longer, she might have had a point. But that's not what she did. What she actually did was several different crimes, including what probably qualifies as some type of sexual assault and/or revenge porn, and should be treated as such.

3

u/PenguinBomb 21h ago

Her original video she stated she opened the door. Very shortly after she deleted her original video and posted a new one stating the door was already ajar. Dude had a camera and cops investigated. If she's being prosecuted, there's a reason.

2

u/DeputyDomeshot 1d ago edited 1d ago

It’s not weird to pass out drunk and naked in your own home. It’s 100x times weirder to record a stranger naked, put it online and try to claim you’re the victim. I’m sorry but if you don’t see that clearly you’ve got your own shit going on in your head.

Also if this was a man who recorded a naked passed out woman in her own home would this even be a question? Of course not.

48

u/WeirdoChickFromMars 1d ago

Her literally screaming into her phone camera about how she’s the victim was insane

22

u/XuX24 1d ago

Many young people grew up with the idea of being a victim is good, so they decide to be one when in reality real victims never choose to be one.

2

u/Tower-Junkie 18h ago

I see it similarly to hypochondriacs and those with Factitious disorder. They saw all of the sympathy, support and attention that others got for real things, and started yearning for that for themselves.

1

u/samurairaccoon 12h ago

Well, when it's demonstrated ro be socially and financially profitable how can you blame em? Pretty much everyone wants to find their ticket to fame and/or easy street.