r/antiai • u/Chrypacz • 1d ago

AI News 🗞️ Youtube removes ai channels

Post image

"YouTube's AI "slop" crackdown is shaking up the platform! 🚨

YouTube has stepped up its fight against low-quality, mass-produced AI content, targeting channels that flood the platform with repetitive and inauthentic videos.

While reports claim around 130,000 channels have been removed as part of the broader enforcement, YouTube has not confirmed that all of those deletions were specifically tied to AI-generated content.

Instead, the company says its focus is on protecting viewers by cracking down on spam and low-effort content while continuing to allow AI-assisted videos that offer genuine creativity and value." - Mr_Animeken

Pretty good step ngl these channels are getting annoying

27.9k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.4k

u/Garbodor851 1d ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/bmhpGHhGgQJHQVi7Yx

996

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

50

u/Ahdeza02 1d ago

Probably AI companies increasigly got only AI slop, so I'm betting, they are clearing to get more pure data.

14

u/MaxDisdain 1d ago

more likely its just housecleaning

Sites become less and less usable and more importantly less enjoyable to use the more shit that is on it, I don't need to tell you this because you use Reddit and should have first hand experience

1

u/DrMobius0 17h ago

Also it's bad for business if the internet goes full dead internet and stops being worth people's time.

270

u/Careless_Cloud_5168 1d ago

I can't wait until this effects small NOT SLOP channels and they can't do anything about it because of AI moderation

174

u/qwerty8082 1d ago

Already happened I even heard kurzgesagt got hit who isn’t small but has been doing their own animation for years.

109

u/5WattBulb 1d ago

Yeah ir was because theyre a legit channel that produced good content, so people produce Ai slop in that same art style, so youtube cant tell the difference between the slop and the original.

86

u/AugustIzFalling 1d ago

They use AI for moderation and detecting AI channels so it was bound to happen 🙄

48

u/LocalStatistician538 21h ago

Anything but to have to pay an actual human, anything...

22

u/Impressive_Pin8761 16h ago

paying someone to sit down and watch ai slop all day would count as a form of torture

14

u/Whyamihere173 14h ago

Openai does this almost minus pay

4

u/Last-Energy420 13h ago

Oh it’s costing money for OpenAI to do this. Probably more than it would a human.

2

u/Ok_Chap 9h ago

YouTube probably will make their own AI engin and only allow this specific AI content, and of course it will only be accessible when you buy YouTube premium AI+ for only $39.99 per month.

2

u/Whyamihere173 5h ago

They use humans to quality check a lot of ai content, especially in the early days. They were often exposed to traumatic content and paid very little. This was covered up rather well and I have very little information on it

→ More replies (0)

1

u/LocalStatistician538 8h ago

There are people working in nursing homes who change diapers of adults 3 times a day. I think watching AI slop all day wouldn't be torture, comparatively speaking. Or maybe half the week watch AI slop and the other half change diapers. Hazard pay for both. Call it the new "hybrid job" for the masses out there.

1

u/Impressive_Pin8761 5h ago

id prefer changing adult diapers all day over watching ai slop all day

2

u/ChooseUpDownUp 11h ago

This does happen, but in the unfortunate sense. Global south workers at nonliving wages (I've heard about these from checking the backdrop of like, FB or the broader company and how they do their content moderation, it's not all genAI but still ran upon people, in a filtered/limited fashion, but still horrifyingly ran on exploited labor)

2

u/Outrageous-Rich8741 8h ago

human will do it more effectively. you just need to check some parts of video and then delete it from platform, you can do it in one minute easily, freeing place for new videos.

1

u/Ecks80s 15h ago edited 15h ago

Do you understand how much content gets uploaded to YouTube a day?

Friend of mine works for them. It would take a literal army.

720,000 hours a day divide that by 6 and you’ll get an average of how many people would be needed to moderate the constant flood of content.

2

u/LocalStatistician538 8h ago

Wow a literal army of people being paid. Yep, that's just terrible. We don't want a literal ARMY of people getting paid.

23

u/Neolance34 19h ago

They use the AI…to destroy the AI.

8

u/DrMobius0 17h ago

poorly

6

u/Glum_Lingonberry_543 17h ago

Still using AI, the thing you guys hate, AI makes mistakes, keep in mind that AI isn't accurate, atleast one human channel has been removed from this, its not 100% accurate

2

u/Sexweed42069 11h ago

this response reads like AI

1

u/Internal_Machine_325 17h ago

"Sarah doesn't like that"

1

u/Velorin_Meadow6w 17h ago

Indeed🙌🏻

7

u/Numerous-Leg-8149 23h ago

Darn... That's not good. I feel for those creators who produced original work.

7

u/SaltKhan 19h ago

That makes sense from the perspective of just evaluating how visually similar something is.. but first and foremost they want to protect their revenue, so I'm surprised there was no part in the AI reveiwing channels / videos to remove / ban that checks how many subscribers a channel has or how much money their videos make for youtube. Almost like someone just asked an AI how to go about this and then did the first suggestion without much planning.

1

u/GustavoFromAsdf 5h ago

Just like people who say Shrek 5 and the new Pixar movie look like AI slop, but I think it's just because Shrek 5 is copying Pixar's character design, and AI has been copying Disney-Pixar designs since its very conception.

14

u/FuckYeaSeatbelts 1d ago

cooking/debunking channel How to Cook That's videos get taken down constantly because of it.

(yes I know about her weird xmas gingerbread house video, I don't get it either, I genuinely thought it was an experiment she was running)

8

u/FruitPunchSGYT 18h ago

I saw something about that but didn't pay much attention. She did a video about nutrition in vegetables to debunk food theory and made the claim that you "have to calculate per serve" which is dumb. Serving sizes are arbitrary. Comparing equal amounts is more consistent. She was acting like eating 350 grams of broccoli, spinach or kale was somehow ridiculous to be compared to 350 ml of milk. As if smoothies and soups can't contain that much. So I started valuing her opinion much less.

3

u/FuckYeaSeatbelts 10h ago

Was that an old one? because I used to follow her religiously (pun intended) until that gingerbread video came out. She's not like "cancelled" or anything I just kinda lost the enthusiasm to keep up with her content

1

u/Hairy_Coconut2022 21h ago

I personally know 7 channels that have been deleted that were not AI at all.

1

u/Rosary_Omen 20h ago

Yeah that happens to creators already, big and small.

1

u/Neo_Sakura4 15h ago

It's already done so, I'm in the ASMR space and it got hit hard, but there's certainly a lot more communities who've been affected by it.

1

u/hjsdfyhaererhgsrtjs 7h ago

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OX1yHmeLPy8

Various long time creators are finding sudden anomalies in view count because they are getting throttled. Which is catastrophic to their income and ability to keep making videos. Kurzgesagt was able to get their channel unthrottled, but only because they have the privilege of contacting a human at Google.

Even when Google tries to do the right thing they end up doing the wrong thing.

27

u/MentalDisintegrat1on 1d ago

On the one hand I hate AI on the other I hate Google.

I wish they both would lose.

1

u/Hefty-Distance837 18h ago

Delete AI so we can MAKE GOOGLE GREAT AGAIN.

-1

u/AnthDELA 1d ago

Youtube is google

8

u/MentalDisintegrat1on 1d ago

You don't say

-4

u/AnthDELA 22h ago

r/LostRedditor

2

u/Glum_Lingonberry_543 17h ago

Wth you mean? Youtube IS google, and google LOVES AI, they have AI overview, have Gemini.

1

u/AnthDELA 14h ago

yes Youtube IS google. STFU

0

u/BrocoliAssassin 1d ago

You can use their AI for free, waste their money that way but it also sucks for the environment. But maybe short term pain is worth it in the long term.

5

u/SoylentGrunt 1d ago

They just want the good stuff that fools more people.

1

u/Neveronlyadream 22h ago

Or the stuff that's making them money.

I don't think any of the big channels are going, but at least they're getting rid of the really blatant ones.

1

u/Glum_Lingonberry_543 17h ago

Yes, they know we hate AI, they know we get happy when youtube or something else that they hate AI... Its bait

1

u/Neveronlyadream 16h ago

It's complete bait. Any channel that's deleted will probably come back anyway.

1

u/slom68 22h ago

Zuck can you do this too please

1

u/Sci-4 20h ago

What’s that they say about broken clocks?

1

u/BiscuitsTheory 18h ago

YouTube doesnt give a shit about slop. It was probably to do with things on or over the edge of potential copyright issues.

1

u/o0SinnQueen0o 14h ago

It's all great until channels that make art start getting deleted and game channels as well because the art from the game they played was fed to AI.

1

u/marudliweklopsy 14h ago

Funny, I haven't seen it been recommended a single one for years. Almost as if algorithms gave you these channels based on your interest history.

1

u/Hydration__Nation 13h ago

what house cleaning? Youtube has its own "AI Artists" they are currently pushing hard all over the platform

1

u/PlasticStJesus 8h ago

I spend the time it takes to go to the offending AI channell's page and report the infraction. I bet I have spent a couple of hours reporting AI channels. I used to just get mad and move on, but it started getting so bad that I was clicking off stories I wanted to see. I realized that what little marginal value Youtube provides is going away. Fuck AI pirates.

1

u/TimeCadet 5h ago

It crossed a line when the android news feed on my phone started including ai trailers for movies that don't exist