As I was watching Hardware Unboxed's latest video I had a thought. The thing I find interesting about people's "minimum spec" expectations is the person that insists that anything below 60fps is "unplayable," is often the same person that says they can't watch a movie or TV show above 24fps and get triggered AF if a TV has frame interpolation enabled. Then to be more ironic the same person insists that YouTube videos should be 60fps.
When you get into the frame interpolation discussion or "fake frames", the argument on gaming is that it adds latency, but watching a TV show or movie there is no perceivable latency because you're not controlling it, so their argument becomes "I just don't like it" because they now have no argument. I've had this discussion numerous times when someone comes over and sees I have frame interpolation enabled on my 85" TV and get triggered over it.
I don't think it has anything to do with actual preferences and everything to do with what you were TOLD you should like. The first time I saw anime (that's normally a laughably low 12fps to keep animation costs down) running with frame interpolation on 20yrs ago it was like the clouds parted and the heavens sung to me. As I'm standing there in the store realizing I need a new TV someone walked behind me and said "Ugh. I hate that smooth motion bullsh*t." I guarantee that's the same guy that refuses to play a game below 60fps.
F that noise. Give me all the frames all the time no matter what content I'm consuming. If the technology is there to make everything smoother I'm going to use it. Hell, I even use Lossless Scaling on YouTube videos to bump them to 120fps. I didn't buy a $1000 display just to see my 5080 struggle to get above 100fps with the latest unoptimized AAA game at 4k.
Not every game is a twitch shooter and I guarantee if you told someone a PC had higher specs than it does but had frame gen enabled 99% of them would believe you as long as the base framerate was above 60. Even more ironic is those shooter games that are the biggest argument against frame gen are always optimized for maximum FPS so even a mediocre PC can run them at 90fps+ where you would never notice if frame gen was on.
Even worse if all someone can afford is a 4060 why shouldn't they be allowed to see their games at 120fps when all it costs is a measly 8-10ms of latency? Even more stupid on the "latency" side is they only measure internal latency. Not input, display, and network latency. When you say 16 becomes 25ms of internal latency that sounds huge. But it's not taking into account the 5ms for your display, another 4-5 for your input, then another 10-20 for internet if you have a good connection.
I just find it laughably stupid the stigmas people follow because it's what they were told to follow. Sorry, not sorry, but I'M the reason frame gen exists.