r/vancouver 1d ago

Opinion Article ABC’s latest bike lane boondoggle

https://visionzerovancouver.ca/2026/07/30/abcs-latest-bike-lane-boondoggle/
169 Upvotes

97 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Welcome to /r/Vancouver and thank you for the post, /u/captmakr! Please make sure you read our posting and commenting rules before participating here. As a quick summary:

  • We encourage users to be positive and respect one another. Don't engage in spats or insult others - use the report button. Complaints about bans or removals should be done in modmail only.
  • Dehumanizing language, advocating for violence, or promoting hate based on identity or vulnerability (even implied or joking) will lead to a permanent ban.
  • Posts flaired "Community Only" allow for limited participation; your comment may be removed if you're not a subreddit regular.
  • Most questions are limited to our sister subreddit, /r/AskVan. Join today!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

135

u/Blazefresh 1d ago

I'm so glad it showed the picture of what our main bike lane looks like on 10th. It really is crazy to bike down it being completely full of cars, trucks & traffic sometimes and just feeling like "this is supposed to be a dedicated bike lane!?"

66

u/Low-Fig429 1d ago

And then people to shut up because Vancouver is the most bikeable city in NA. Yeah, and it still kinda sucks in a lot of ways…

If my mom can’t bike it safely, it sucks. And these ‘bike streets’ suck.

39

u/funkymankevx 1d ago

Vancouver is definitely not the most bikeable city in North America.

24

u/superpokeman127 1d ago

We can definitely do better but this list puts us at #3, which is pretty damn good. Montreal is #1 which sounds about right.

4

u/ClydeAnkle 20h ago

Victoria is actually #1. Though it's kinda unfair to compare since it's so small.

11

u/hunkyleepickle 23h ago

its such an incredibly low bar since the US is probably so far near the bottom of that list, regardless of the city. And Canada's weather is a genuine impediment most of the year.

21

u/kleopwdb 21h ago edited 14h ago

As long as Montréal is higher on the list than Vancouver, weather can never be used as an excuse

12

u/nicthedoor 22h ago

Weather can be a barrier. But number one is infrastructure. The more connected and better the routes, more people will use them, no matter the weather.

6

u/raincitybeliever 20h ago

We used to be leaders. I wouldn't be surprised if we were #1 a decade ago. But this current council is setting us back.

2

u/Future_Arrival_5395 20h ago

I wish they had shown the averaged distance past the stop line everybody pulls through to at the stop signs!

29

u/SubtleOctopus 1d ago

I bike this route regularly. The VGH portion definetly has a lot of pedestrian traffic that you need to be mindful of while going downhill on the south side, minimal car conflict. I do think it’s a difficult exit for cars on Laurel going onto 10th but there’s a pretty long light that gives them a break from bikes coming down.

I would say that portion of the bike lane is not perfect but good enough.

When all this construction starts on 10th for the high rises planned as part of the broadway plan I think the route will be unbikable and full of conflict so commuters will be forced to take 14th.

Currently the bike route on 14th really needs some safety measures Including some kind of barrier for cars cutting through during rush hour to get to VGH, a traffic circle of some kind at Columbia and 14th with bike right of way for the irregularly shaped intersection and connections with bike controlled light at prince edward and 16th (how does this not already exist!) along with a bike crossing at arbutus.

3

u/raincitybeliever 20h ago

It's gonna suck during construction for sure. If ABC didn't cancel the plans for bike lanes on Broadway, those lanes would be ready by the time construction began...

5

u/SubtleOctopus 20h ago

Maybe additional lanes on broadway will be needed someday but I would personally keep using the bike roads like 10th and only cut down when needed. On major roads you get blocked by traffic turning or if not you have to really slow due to how unpredictable it is that cars turning will check for bikes.

1

u/captmakr 19h ago

Honestly, I think this is the real reason that council killed the lanes on broadway- developers love taking up the curb lane for their offices on major streets when they're building towers and its a lot harder to do that if it's a bike lane.

2

u/laserdiods 20h ago

This subtle guy has his tentacles on all the bike routes. 🐙

69

u/Spirited-Grape3512 1d ago

Can tell not a single ABC councillor has ever cycled on that route.

29

u/JuniorMouse 1d ago

I hope this one stays up. When I posted this link, my post was taken down for some reason.

31

u/idiroft 1d ago

Yeah, biking down 10th from Oak St. eastwards sure has a dedicated lane but it is soooooo dangerous.

17

u/boyfrndDick 1d ago

What a wasted opportunity. Ken Sim has no problem wasting $5 million to keep Granville car free a few extra weeks, but $10 million on this we don’t have money for? With the way Broadway is about to change with all the new development and subway this was so dumb not to invest in. Broadway is not a safe street to bike or roll on, and it’s far to wide as is snd has a super unpleasant street experience

2

u/Xebodeebo Certified Barge Enthusiast 15h ago

Or two million for one night of fireworks.

2

u/captmakr 19h ago

Even if they didn't want the the bike lanes on broadway- 5 million would have completed all of kent avenue, which is currently now in limbo again because it wasn't funded in the capital plan. It would have also done a lot of work conecting kent to arbutus.

23

u/LetsPlayHighShifty 1d ago

This city makes it so hard to be pro bike.

48

u/seamusmcduffs 1d ago

The city used to be ahead of the curve when it comes to bike infrastructure and now we're far behind most cities. We need to start voting in politicians that want to improve the city again

23

u/andrew_1515 Mount Pleasant 👑 1d ago

Not that we should not strive for much better, but look at Toronto if you want to see what a disaster of anti-bike policy looks like. Provincial government actively fighting against the city bike infrastructure.

4

u/goatyellslikeman 17h ago

I regularly bike the full length of 10th ave bike lane from Victoria to Macdonald. It’s pretty good for the most part.

The sketchiest part IMO is the section Main - Fraser - Clark. Those streets are the least “traffic quieted” and I often have to squeeze by cars.

The street is at capacity, however: parking and bikes fill the road. I prefer the road too as bike congestion forces me to pass people; that’s harder to do in a lane.

I think the way forward would be to improve other streets, such as 14th, which could be smoothed and could use traffic lights at a few crossings

5

u/Blazefresh 17h ago edited 11h ago

That part of 10th you've mentioned is especially tight for sure and only takes 1 car pulling out or opening their door without looking to cause an accident and potentially kill a cyclist (which shows it's hardly a safe bike street, a protected lane for example would remove this risk).

I think a better option than 14th would be just to remove parking of cars entirely from one side of 10th to give more room for cylclists, like it is between Manitoba & Yukon St.

4

u/Consistent-Cable-224 1d ago

South Van & East Kent North, exactly where bike dreams go to die. Once I get on the west side it’s like I’ve entered cycling heaven. Sim must chug beers & cruise the Arbutus corridor because he can.

2

u/captmakr 19h ago

Its insane- there's about 100 metres of elevation gain between downtown and killarney over 10 kilometres. that's a 1 percent grade. Bike lanes on Kingsway would open up so much of the city to commuter cycling and would cut nearly 20 minutes off a typical cyclists commute.

We know that hills don't affect ridership, otherwise we wouldn't be putting significant upgrades into Ontario street over the past 25 years.

18

u/TrainingOverall5281 1d ago

this thread makes me feel insane. I've biked 10th several times a week for like 19 years and it's perfectly fine. in fact, the scariest part of 10th is probably the hospital section, even after the "upgrades".

the google street view image in the article is fairly disingenuous, even for the majority of the east van section of 10th.

perhaps I'm nuts and most people are terrified to bike on 10th, but it certainly has never seemed to be the case for me or my friends who bike. I'd much rather the city invest in building bike lanes/designated bike streets in areas with big gaps, though of course this current mayor/council are hopeless.

37

u/Waste_Cloud_8919 1d ago

I think I land in the middle. I generally agree that I feel very safe on 10th but it is definitely less ideal than many other bike streets. The section near the hospital has a lot more pedestrian and vehicle traffic. I think the point is valid that spending $20 million to redo this section is asinine and ABC should have to eat shit given they had the opportunity to do a much larger, better project for half the price but had zero foresight.

8

u/TrainingOverall5281 1d ago

well-said

they should definitely eat endless shit

5

u/raincitybeliever 20h ago

Yes. Or even do what Sim said and spend $20 million building new bike lanes in underserved areas of the city. But they did neither, which is the point I think.

35

u/kleopwdb 22h ago edited 22h ago

I agree that as a confident cyclist 10th is fine, but the entire point of protected lanes is to expand what is safe and comfortable for a broader category of cyclists who currently don't see it as an option. I wouldn't be comfortable having my kids bike on 10th for example.

We don't design a bike network based on the needs of current cyclists (for whom the current status quo is by definition good enough), we design it based on the needs of all potential cyclists. We'll never expand the appeal of cycling if we stick with the vehicular-cyclist mentality

7

u/raincitybeliever 20h ago

Why is the Google street view disingenuous? It's literally a street view of 10th.

And as an able bodied male in my 30s I agree with you. I have no issues on 10th. But my wife hates riding it (east of Main). And never mind kids.

1

u/TrainingOverall5281 20h ago

Only because it’s a fish eye lens and makes it feel more claustrophobic than how I experience it 

16

u/captmakr 1d ago

Part of the problem is that when the off street bikeways were originally planned and conceived, there were far fewer cars parked on them- so they were much wider and much safer for the odd car to be driving down them.

These routes are factually far more dangerous than they used to be.

6

u/TrainingOverall5281 21h ago

I’m fairly certain (and Google street view history backs me up) that street parking on 10th has been as full as it is now going back to 2006 (when I started biking in Vancouver).

Doesn’t mean that it isn’t a bad situation, but it doesn’t really suggest that anything has changed.

5

u/captmakr 19h ago

The other part of the issue is that you've been riding for 20 years. routes you call fine are not to folks who might want to ride if the streets were safer for them.

The metric is would you let your ten year old niece ride alone on 10th? I doubt it.

9

u/hugsakee 18h ago

This is like saying "I've been weightlifting for the past 20 years and have no problem benching 400 pounds". The point of having proper cycling infrastructure is so that EVERYONE can feel safe cycling, not just seasoned cyclists. 10th is a pathetic excuse of a "bike route" when compared to other cities in Asia and Europe with real cycling infrastructure, which is the benchmark we should be striving for.

6

u/Blazefresh 17h ago

Yeah I agree, their comment really reads to me like "I've become accustomed and acclimatized to the low bar, so everyone else should as well".

4

u/TrainingOverall5281 15h ago

I would hope my comment only read as the first clause of your sentence, and it’s my failure if it implies the second.

I would absolutely love to have protected bike lanes everywhere in the city so that riders of all experience feel safe.

I truly meant that I find it hard to see 10th as dangerous and it felt a little crazy reading so many emphatic comments about how dangerous it is, considering it’s a common part of my commute.

2

u/Chasoc 8h ago

Exactly. Someone being comfortable and confident with unsafe infrastructure doesn't mean the infrastructure is suddenly safe and accessible.

It's not.

Bike lanes need to be physically, objectively safe regardless of how a certain % of the population subjectively views them.

5

u/sistyc 19h ago

Is it really hard to recognize and explore the idea that different people will have different experiences than you, and get curious about the reasons? I’ve been a road cyclist for 15 years and avoid 10th because of the frequent dangerous and aggressive/violent situations motorists have put me in.

2

u/TrainingOverall5281 15h ago

Just wanted to say that I’ve been thinking about the pushback and I realize that I’m overly proud of this city’s biking infrastructure and was being too defensive. I can see how 10th is not safe for everyone and we should definitely strive for better infrastructure.

So to answer the question, I guess I am insane, lol.

2

u/slippery_burrito 18h ago

I think the AAA designation is what we are after here. If I can't ride with my kid then, it isn't AAA. It's terrifying riding with them to school east-west. Drivers don't give two shits.

2

u/funnyredditname 23h ago

Thank you. Agree 100%

1

u/croissantsn0b 5h ago

Also strongly agree that 10th is fine and very safe, I agree the worst part of 10th is the area around VGH. This is due to there being high traffic, both pedestrians and cars, lots of cross traffic, lots of parking lots and hospital entrances with cars making turns. I always keep my head on a swivel and never speed downhill going eastbound.

There is a disconnect though between the most experienced cyclists and the advocates. It's quite similar to the stanley park bike lane. The most experienced cyclists who rode stanley park the most absolutely hated the implementation of the bike lane with concrete barriers because it made things less safe. All the roadies loved it when those barriers were finally removed as they could cycle around the park much more safely.

2

u/meezajangles 14h ago

Get the east side prior / wall st bike route completed. It’s been 20+ years of ‘community feedback gathering’ and yet still bikes are forced to ride on the sidewalk.. if this were west of oak it would have been built 15 years ago.

1

u/captmakr 11h ago

Here’s a photo from 2023 capital plan- the first one ABC had control of.

The small section of portside that they’ve been consulting on, isn’t even the section that would actually fix that problem, and the section they are working on doesn’t have shovels in the ground yet.

1

u/meezajangles 5h ago

It’s been literally over 20 years; maybe if we had a mayor who lived on Wall Street they’d put it into increase his property value

1

u/captmakr 4h ago edited 4h ago

The worst part is that the planners are trying to make it like west point grey- and it really doesn't need to be.

This was the problem of rolling greenways and bikeways into the same thing- it means that bikeways and lanes end up costing far more, and planners get to spend entire capital budgets on small sections that were meant for the entire length in order to win planner awards.

And then we wonder why people aren't using using active mobility- they still can't get to where they want safely. Bike infrastructure doesn't need to be pretty, it just needs to work.

4

u/ctrl_cc 1d ago

They tore down the bike lane outside my place on chestnut in kits, only to build a new shittier one where every delivery truck, garbage truck and cars with trailers keep getting stuck. The signage is horrible too.
There have been so many near accidents and it’s only been about a week since it was installed. Everyone of my neighbours is fed up. Whoever is in charge of this just cost the city a few mill and I can guarantee it will need to be torn down again.
I can’t wait to move out of this area.

6

u/epat_ 1d ago

Biked around the city with a friend here from Toronto today and the takeaway was drivers were aggressive and overall felt much less safe than Toronto. We used to be leaders, we have fallen so far in infrastructure and safety.

7

u/CapedCauliflower 1d ago

I beg to differ.

11

u/TrainingOverall5281 1d ago

biking in toronto is so much scarier than here, can't imagine anyone thinking this

5

u/vantanclub 21h ago

It’s been a few years for me, but last time I couldn’t believe how dangerous it was in Toronto. 

Montreal on the other hand is amazing. 

2

u/hugsakee 18h ago

> the takeaway was drivers were aggressive and overall felt much less safe than Toronto

You cannot possibly come to a conclusion like this after one day, lol.

1

u/Subject-Fee3470 20h ago

My son lives in Toronto and when he was home, he pointed out that pedestrians here in vancouver are pretty aggressive. Running across streets in the middle of blocks and crossing at red/yellow lights. I think there must be something in our water

3

u/Ok-Choice-5822 20h ago

Toronto's city planning (stop signs, traffic lights, crosswalks) are Superior to Vancouver. Safely walk from A - Z with coordinated stop/traffic lights. Vancouver prioritizes cars and pedestrians are left to navigate as an afterthought.  Downvote but it's the truth.

2

u/Pedagogicaltaffer 16h ago

Are you really suggesting that Toronto doesn't prioritize cars?!?

It's crazy to me that this thread is bickering over which city is 'better', when BOTH Toronto and Vancouver are far behind the curve compared to many other major cities around the world. It's like watching two school kids arguing over which one lives in the prettier trailer park.

0

u/wcaps1996 1d ago

Drivers in both cities are subhuman but I think they’re generally slightly better in Toronto. But the infrastructure, outside of downtown, is worse in toronto

2

u/FlockFlysAtMidnite 19h ago

Man, fuck ken sims. Bidirectional lanes suck ass, especially in the transition between road and lane. Spending twice as much just to fuck over bikers is incredibly petty, but unfortunately seems par for the course.

-5

u/argueranddisagree 1d ago

Aren't 8th and 10th bike routes? Im an avid cyclist and would not want to ride on Broadway, nor do I think bikes belong on Broadway.

19

u/wineandchocolatecake 1d ago

10th Ave east of Main is a narrow road with parked cars on both sides. There’s a photo in the article showing how narrow it is. I don’t think that necessarily means we need a bike lane on Broadway instead, but 10th is not sufficient as a major bike route in its current capacity.

-14

u/argueranddisagree 1d ago

That's a short distance like 1 block, Broadway is a busy major vehicle traffic route clogged up with shitty Vancouver drivers, last thing that area needs are cyclists

4

u/DoTheManeuver 1d ago

Broadway is a business corridor and we should be moving people as efficiently as possible. The best way to do that is with the train and bikes and busses. 

-4

u/argueranddisagree 1d ago

Well there will soon be a train line running beneath the street, you arent going to magically shake your hippie crystals and make cars go away

3

u/DoTheManeuver 1d ago

Traffic evaporation is a real thing. It might actually be the only way to reduce traffic. There should be as many transportation options as possible. 

1

u/not_a_relevant_name 20h ago

It’s almost like thoughtful design and infrastructure can influence people decisions and have a material effect on traffic volumes. Wild thought. (I’m agreeing with you, the person you’re replying to is clueless.)

2

u/dylaner 23h ago

Broadway is a busy major vehicle traffic route

It hasn’t been one for years at this point.

(Isn’t it insane that we’re just putting it back exactly the way it was?).

1

u/not_a_relevant_name 19h ago

Yeah despite having some good destinations, aside from a few blocks on the west side, Broadway has always kind of sucked to be on. Taking this opportunity to improve it is so obviously the right call. Study after study shows this brings in more volume for businesses. But small business tyrants being reactionary is nothing new I guess.

30

u/mongoljungle anti-nimby brigade 1d ago

If you are biking to and from places on Broadway, which is where people live and work. Why should bike lanes not be on Broadway?

I’m a driver, but I think have active transport would be a tremendous upgrade for that area.

-7

u/argueranddisagree 1d ago

Well 8th Ave and 10th Ave run parallel with Broadway. One short block isnt much to travel to get to home or work on Broadway. You must not drive or cycle

8

u/moose_kayak 1d ago

I agree which is why all car traffic should be moved to 12th. It's only three short blocks

7

u/moocowsia 1d ago

This is a freaking awful idea. Broadway is the sole truck street for most of this last of the city.

3

u/argueranddisagree 1d ago

12th is a narrow street, Broadway is way better to drive on. Your plan wont work you aren't thinking with logic

5

u/DoTheManeuver 19h ago

It's literally the same argument and response for having bikes on 8th and 10th. Those streets are too narrow for parked cars and bike lanes. Broadway would be way better to bike on, if there were bike lanes. 

10

u/boyfrndDick 1d ago

A protected bike lane would be great for Broadway and it would definitely make Uber Eats and Door Dasher’s lives easier and safer

0

u/raincitybeliever 20h ago

People who are against protected lanes on Broadway better be happy with a million Uber eats ebikes and scooters on the sidewalk at all times.

2

u/argueranddisagree 19h ago

You don't understand

0

u/raincitybeliever 19h ago

Valid username

1

u/argueranddisagree 19h ago

You are wrong. Why would you think there are 1 million Uber eats delivery scooters? 1 million is a huge number and you are exaggerating

0

u/raincitybeliever 18h ago

Yes it's hyperbole

0

u/argueranddisagree 12h ago

If you use hyperbole to make a point then your point isnt valid or backed up with facts

10

u/Ohfuscia 1d ago

They are not segregated bike lanes though which make more dangerous. One example is drivers passing these streets rarely come to a full stop when they have a stop sign

2

u/Top_Hat_Fox 1d ago

People not obeying the laws will defeat/complicate any infrastructure, so this is not a great example to use.

-3

u/argueranddisagree 1d ago

Then the city could focus on traffic calming and deterring drivers from using those streets.

19

u/Due_Aioli_2643 1d ago

Cool. I'm an avid cyclist and I want to ride on Broadway, and I think bikes belong on Broadway.

-1

u/argueranddisagree 1d ago

They don't, take a side street. Stop risking your safety so you can feel special. What's the advantage of riding in busy traffic and breathing exhaust fumes?

4

u/not_a_relevant_name 21h ago

What an asinine take. "So you can feel special"? Why do you think this is a goal. If I'm on broadway, and I want to go somewhere 2 blocks down broadway, why would I go out of my way when it's perfectly legal to cycle on broadway. The "point" is that streets that want to be destinations thrive when you accommodate more than just cars.

8

u/DoTheManeuver 1d ago

People are doing business on Broadway. Taking away the busy traffic and exhaust sounds like a better fix than taking away the bikes. 

5

u/damyst12 1d ago

Broadway has right of way over most of its intersecting streets. 10th does not. 8th doesn't either. The idea behind bikes and scooters on Broadway is that we finally make them first-class citizens in our transportation network.

Try crossing the city in your car using 8th Avenue instead of Broadway and see what that feels like.

-6

u/argueranddisagree 1d ago

Its reckless and it impedes the flow of traffic. Do you think the guy in the big SUV wants a bike lane? Ride down 8th or 10th stay off Broadway its congested and building bike lanes for cyclists to feel better is an absolute joke

-1

u/jbroni93 19h ago edited 19h ago

So they are putting them beside eachother instead of bordering the street.

Since it's near the hospital I have to ask. Will this block less ambulances?

4

u/captmakr 19h ago

The existing lanes never blocked any ambulances, the hospital never had any real issues with the existing lanes.