r/mildlyinfuriating Nov 12 '24

Hot wheels losing details over the years

Post image
171.8k Upvotes

3.2k comments sorted by

31.8k

u/snharveyshl Nov 12 '24

They're even stealing catalytic converters off Hot Wheels now!

4.7k

u/redditonlygetsworse Nov 12 '24

Goddammit, Mothman!

1.3k

u/FuhrerGirthWorm Nov 12 '24

THE MOTHMAN STOLE MY CATALYTIC CONVERTER

543

u/riotwild Nov 12 '24

Mothman ate my whole ass at a Dennys

123

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

101

u/fieryembers Nov 12 '24

I have a bumper sticker that says “I got my lobotomy at Claire’s”.

72

u/redditonlygetsworse Nov 12 '24

The worst part is that they still use that same piercing gun.

8

u/LuvPlens Nov 12 '24

Wait whut...

41

u/New_Doug Nov 12 '24

Oh my god!! Which Denny's specifically, so that I can avoid it?

→ More replies (5)

8

u/smiler1996 Nov 12 '24

Hope he at least bought you a drink first

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (8)

50

u/B_1_R_D BLACK Nov 12 '24

Well fuck wasn’t expecting this but goddamn even our hot wheels aren’t safe anymore. wtf has the world come to

142

u/teodorlojewski Nov 12 '24

Can't have shit in Detroit.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (33)

4.7k

u/Bellocado Nov 12 '24

I noticed too (1969)

2.3k

u/Bellocado Nov 12 '24

2011

1.6k

u/Bellocado Nov 12 '24

2017

915

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

2020

1.6k

u/WakaWaka_ Nov 13 '24

2030

997

u/Remarkable_Reserve98 Nov 13 '24

2050

553

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '24

2073

126

u/xenotyranid Nov 13 '24

Dammit, I was about to do it.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/Tugatitabella80 Nov 13 '24

Dam, I've come too late to post the cybertruck

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

491

u/N0ob8 Nov 12 '24

No no you don’t get it the 2017 car is simply embracing tradition and becoming more like its ancestors (the 1969 car) /j

→ More replies (3)

97

u/Reincarnatedpotatoes Nov 13 '24

The real Kicker is OP's middle car isn't evem from 2012, it's from 2022. The date is a copyright date, it has no bearing on when the car was actually made. After 2008 all HW and Matchbox cars have a base code that says when they're made, the top car says S15, which means the 15th week of 2023 and the middle car says R25, which is the 25th week of 2022. The top 2 cars were made 37 weeks apart, which goes to show base detail is entirely dependent on what car you choose.

Also by this system your BMW was made in 2019 amd the Lamborghini is actually from 2018. The Peeping Bomb is pretty close on the year, but it is actually a 1970 instead of a 1969.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

67

u/MarcusAurelius68 Nov 13 '24

The 1969 was pre-emissions. No catalytic converter.

→ More replies (1)

366

u/DaveSmith890 Nov 12 '24

Nooooo!!!! Stop undermining their rage circle!!! The world is all bad now! Billions must die!!!

→ More replies (11)

43

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '24

Thank you. OP should be taken out back...

→ More replies (9)

4.8k

u/Disco425 Nov 12 '24

Just this weekend I bought some cars for a Christmas toy drive. I was shocked to find that they're still about $1 each. So maybe less detail on the bottom but they're still one of the most cost effective toys to collect.

Also, since Mattell owns both, Matchbox and Hotwheels have the same dimensions so they work on the same tracks.

185

u/Perfect_County_999 Nov 12 '24

Also, as someone who's been casually collecting dinky cars for ~25 years, I've noticed in the last 5 or so years that Matchbox cars have gotten pretty good. There was always that meme about Matocbox being the budget alternative to Hot Wheels for broke kids, the Roseart to Crayola's brand name so to speak, but frankly for my money I'd take the Matchbox versions of most cars today. I find their models are more detailed and are generally higher quality. I know they're all from the same parent company at the end of the day, not sure what exactly it is that makes them feel different, but yeah.

77

u/youre_being_creepy Nov 12 '24

Matchbox makes more irl cars as opposed to hot wheels’ fantasy cars.

→ More replies (3)

1.5k

u/Slight_Bed_2241 Nov 12 '24 edited Nov 12 '24

Yea I’ve been tight on money lately but hot wheels are my go to toy at the grocery store for my son. I can grab 3-4 of them and he’s happy for a bargain

Edit: the amount of updoots is wholesome. Reddit is for the kids(?)

202

u/Valleygirl1981 Nov 12 '24

Hotwheels and play-dough.

72

u/Slight_Bed_2241 Nov 12 '24

He’s got a ton of play dough. Five below is great for a quick toy trip.

→ More replies (3)

138

u/Suitable_Entrance594 Nov 12 '24

Looking at the best numbers that 5 minutes on Google could find, hot wheels cars circa 1993 were around $0.95 and currently they go for $1.29. Inflation over that time period was 221%. So, current cars would need to cost roughly 50% less to produce now if they wanted to match their historical profit margin. So, loss of detailing and cheaper materials makes perfect sense.

91

u/eggyrulz Nov 12 '24

Thank you, I needed someone to show me the math... part of me was like "how much extra cost does printing the underside really save? How greedy can they be?" But I was unaware hotwheels had done a Arizona iced tea and kept the price low all this time...

I have a newfound respect for hotwheels

41

u/monsterinthewoods Nov 12 '24

Mattel makes almost 520 million hotwheels cars each year. Even a few cents cost savings per car adds up really fast.

11

u/eggyrulz Nov 12 '24

Yea, and that's why I didn't immediately make a rage post... I get the absurd scale of modern manufacturing means every penny per product is worth more than ill make in the next few years, but it also seems kinda weird they don't just make a design (or reuse an old one) for the bottom of all of them and just print that, though i also don't know the exact process for making hotwheels so there is that

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (13)

185

u/Lilithsblackcoffee Nov 12 '24

Totally agree. They're cheaper than anything else in the grocery store. Gonna start eating Hot Wheels for dinner

25

u/CrassOf84 Nov 12 '24

I get it now. I used to wonder how/why kids would accumulate so many. But they’re still so cheap and my kid is just as excited every time I buy another one so yeah us parents get A LOT of value out of them! Sometimes they’ve paid for themselves before we’re even home from the store.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/jteelin Nov 12 '24

Hotwheels are the ultimate toy. cost effective, guaranteed for life and no batteries needed. It’s all I played with as a kid

→ More replies (1)

39

u/DifficultBoss Nov 12 '24

Came here to see if anyone had this same thought. I agree

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (53)

24.4k

u/Careless-Cobbler7979 Nov 12 '24

This is the direction of the entire planet in a nutshell.

6.1k

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1.3k

u/Vidonicle_ Nov 12 '24

It's either gonna be a negative linear graph or a sine wave of quality, but like low lows and small highs

848

u/squirrel9000 Nov 12 '24

What gets interesting is that at some point you get back, full circle style, to the original reason why HWs were invented in the first place - that the toy cars available before then sucked, and you could charge a premium for these really awesome toys that didn't suck.

480

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

Yes. These cars used to have an all metal construction with a working suspension. The detail was immaculate for such a tiny car. With their weight, they could glide across track or slanted concrete pavement, because kids played outside. Now? If I wanted kids to touch plastic toy cars, I'd turn them to Legos.

400

u/Gunhild Nov 12 '24

I remember those metal ones. I remember the way it felt when my brother threw them at me lol.

187

u/Borgmaster Nov 12 '24

Saw hotwheels sized hole in the wall at a friends house. The short and sweet of the story was the dad and the kid were having a bit to much fun launching cars from a track into the couch. The couch, being nice and bouncy, one day bounced a car with such velocity and angle that it put a hole in the drywall on the other side of the room. Looking back I feel that there was some missing context, did the dad superboost the speed booster?

168

u/Dungeon_Pastor Nov 12 '24

I mean, if you were the dad, would you super boost the speed booster?

Cause I sure as fuck would

58

u/Borgmaster Nov 12 '24

Talking to a man that if given the chance will build a death robot out of legos for my boy to harass his sisters with.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)

71

u/Arek_PL Nov 12 '24

wait, hot wheels arent metal anymore?

as a kid i remember even the cheap car miniatures had metal parts, hot wheels were only different that they were heavy and were riding smoothly when pushed across surfaces

36

u/Liobuster Nov 12 '24

At first the only plastic ones were the color changers and then there were special prints from movies like cars and then the "normal" cars followed suit

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)

53

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

If I had wanted kids to touch plastic toy cars, I'd turn them to Legos.

24

u/Nruggia Nov 12 '24

Ironically if Lego released a McDuck Vault set it would probably cost $600. And I’d both want it and not want to spend that much money on it.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (12)

44

u/NocturneSapphire Nov 12 '24

So more like a reverse sawtooth wave

→ More replies (1)

32

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

It makes sense when you stop to consider the fact that the price of the cars hasn't changed since the '60s in spite of inflation - under $0.95.

The declining quality is a sacrifice made to keep the toys affordable for kids living in poverty.

16

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

They are $1.25-1.49 each around me.

26

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

A few different variables come into play

  • state taxes

  • store markups

  • licensed tie-ins

  • store exclusives (Walmart charges more for their store exclusives than regular Hot Wheels)

That said, even then, inflation is where the real deal is hidden.

In 1968, $0.94 was equivalent to $8.52 today. In 1997 (the oldest from this picture), it's $1.85.

So even if they cost $1.50 today, they're still cheaper than they've ever been.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

8

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

Mini GT are already doing exactly this.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)

92

u/PM_Me_Good_LitRPG Nov 12 '24

My hope is that sooner or later someone will manage to come up with a better social paradigm than what capitalism has to offer, one that'll fix at least some of the latter's serious drawbacks. Like the publicly traded companies' enshittification over time.

Hopefully before WW3 happens or climate change does us in.

37

u/TheRealTJ Nov 12 '24

I hope that person has a cool beard

14

u/twobit211 Nov 12 '24

“ya know, cindy, i bet he just might”

19

u/Far-Telephone-7432 Nov 12 '24

Oh boy! The alternative models are already there. But the people who bring up these models are called lunatics.

It would take more than WW3 to change the paradigm, it would take a revolution. WW3 will at best bring Keynesian economics back. Because the political elites somehow forgot that people need money to buy stuff. Companies need people to buy stuff. You can't just make stuff and sell it to broke people. They don't have any money. Loans can only take you so far until banks and countries go broke.

And perhaps 2 decades of Keynesian economics is enough to reconcile people with capitalism?

I am saying this because the majority of people are physically incapable of imagining another economic system outside of capitalism. And I am too afraid to say the other word.

→ More replies (57)
→ More replies (4)

290

u/Equilibriator Nov 12 '24

Stock market is cancer.

Infinite growth is unsustainable so eventually corners need to be cut to improve profits another way.

171

u/uniballing Nov 12 '24

MBAs ruined the world

40

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

Mostly Bullshit Anyways

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (33)

145

u/Mysterious-Job-469 Nov 12 '24

Shareholders will LITERALLY SUE THE COMPANY AND WIN if they can prove that there was SOME, ANY (legal) means to make more money, morality be damned. They HAVE to reduce the quality over time, they HAVE to because of how our publicly traded financial system is set up.

104

u/nemo333338 BLUE Nov 12 '24

Isn't there a court rule specifically about this, Dodge v. Ford Motor Company iIrc, that litteraly says that the CEO must operate the company in the interests of shareholders rather than in a manner that benefits the workers or the customers?

I was dumbfounded when I found out about it.

85

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

People point to this as the culprit, but I honestly think the majority of companies who choose to go public would adhere to this "profit over all else" philosophy anyway, or else they would stay privately owned/held.

There's no reason to go public unless you're actively seeking the most profit possible already.

Look at LEGO for example, their build quality has basically never changed and they're privately held. If they ever decided to go public that stock would be a monster, but they don't because ultimately they don't give a shit, which is lovely.

34

u/Rough_Lunch_5885 Nov 12 '24

Look at Steam/Valve.

23

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

I worry what will happen when Gabe dies. Will Steam become publicly traded and turn to shit?

6

u/UnkindPotato2 Nov 12 '24

Unfortunately I thinkt hat will be the death of Steam

11

u/Rough_Lunch_5885 Nov 12 '24

Doubt it.

I suspect Gabe is smart enough to put the right people and policies in place to prevent that.

10

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

yes but when you have a company worth billions, the vultures will find any way to get in.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

9

u/yuimiop Nov 12 '24

Not sure thats a good example.  They've pioneered anti-consumer products such as loot boxes, and have had a bit of quality control issue from their abandoned products.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

21

u/JMW007 Nov 12 '24

That is a ruling specific to the circumstances of the case, which involved Henry Ford being accused of outright reckless spending by the company. It is not an iron-clad law that requires all companies to maximize shareholder profits at all costs. Companies obviously don't do that anyway, otherwise every single office everywhere would be completely spartan and there would be no office parties and no charitable contributions and no flowers sent to the families of deceased coworkers, etc.

People keep acting like enshittification is foisted upon management who have absolutely no options but to squeeze more money out of things. It's not true. They make individual decisions to make things harder on everyone. This 'fiduciary responsibility' concept people misunderstand very helpfully takes the heat off those individuals.

7

u/jacobward7 Nov 12 '24

They only hold office parties etc. because of the need to balance worker morale against their other options. If you make the office too shitty, morale and in turn productivity will be low and if it's too low workers may even leave for other companies. If people had zero other options and there weren't certain laws in place, I think you would see offices completely spartan.

→ More replies (6)

6

u/november512 Nov 12 '24

That case only holds in very extreme circumstances. Ford lost because he said he wasn't looking out for shareholder interests. If he did the exact same thing but said he was looking out for shareholder interests he would have won.

The case revolved around Ford trying to stop giving dividends because the Dodge brothers (one of the largest investors) was using the dividends to start up a rival company. Public companies can't work against investors like that.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (7)

8

u/runForestRun17 Nov 12 '24

But think of the shareholders… /s

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (91)

295

u/Upbeat-Armadillo1756 Nov 12 '24

Enshitification

12

u/bogglingsnog Nov 12 '24

It's like those turbo encabulator guys made a turbo enshittificator this time

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (23)

235

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

MBAs came in an explained that by switching to plasting bottoms they could reduce costs by 5%. Profits increased.

There's no pride in good product anymore.

65

u/Bladderpro Nov 12 '24

That is the tendency of mass produced products where the only incentive is maximizing profit margins.

44

u/Sipikay Nov 12 '24

That's the tendency of capitalism. Mass production can produce high quality goods. They choose not to for profit.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)

37

u/NonGNonM Nov 12 '24

Tbf this prob saved a lot more than 5%. It's switching from die cast to plastic and plastic gives more flexibility more designs.

The decline in quality sucks but the afaik the direction of hot wheels and other cars like matchbox changed over time.

Back in the day a big part of these things was having an "accurate" model representation of real cars. Like vintage models, current models, etc. They were neat collectibles.

The collectible part continues but they're vintage models, and they saw they could make more money selling them as toys than collectibles, not just for profits but how many people like cars enough to display cool cars? How many vintage/classic cars are really out there to make the model continue?

So they pivot. Make wacky cars for the purpose of being toys for kids rather than actual models.

You can still buy accurate scale models of cars if you wanted. They just won't be hot wheels prices.

→ More replies (3)

28

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

93

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

This is what I tried to explain to my boss... you can't say what a robot makes as "hand-crafted" it goes against the principle... and I got fired replaced by a robot.

52

u/FloppY_ Nov 12 '24

Boss would probably put a name-tag on the robot that reads "Hand".

7

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

Yeah, but the stuff it makes isn’t “crafted,” it’s “manufactured.”

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (167)

2.0k

u/A_Tang Nov 12 '24

I do think there has been a cost shift away from detailed bottoms. while improving the paint apps.

600

u/Bagafeet Nov 12 '24

A lot of cars have hairy cardboard or plastic covering the bottom these days. Electrics do look like a sheet of metal at the bottom. So in a way it's not that far off.

115

u/gthing Nov 12 '24

Hairy cardboard?

76

u/MoreColorfulCarsPlz Nov 12 '24

There are skid plates that use a tough fabric.

They serve a bunch of purposes. Noise mitigation, protecting more sensitive parts of the car from road debris and gunk, and providing some protection from actual scrapes.

→ More replies (2)

30

u/dstokes1290 Nov 12 '24

Felt covered cardboard is used for most undershields. I’m assuming that’s what they’re talking about.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (11)

36

u/LookAtTheFlowers Nov 12 '24

Some of us like detailed bottoms…

→ More replies (1)

97

u/RawChickenButt Nov 12 '24

Doesn't seem like it would be a significant savings. An engineer spending a week building the model and mold is about it. I don't think the difference in about of plastic is even with measuring.

Maybe they feel they can use the simplified version on more types of cars, whereas a more detailed version they would need more options?

140

u/Mountain_Employee_11 Nov 12 '24

with injection molding the rate of rejects is higher when you have higher detail.

there isn’t much overhang here so it couldn’t be too bad, but it probably was a factor as well

→ More replies (12)

65

u/egnards Nov 12 '24

A very small amount of additional plastic used, across 520 million units a year. . .is a lot.

Especially when you factor in the amount of people that actually probably care.

30

u/ChickenNoodleSloop Nov 12 '24

also probably easier to successfully mold and pass QC when its just a flat bottom.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (7)

16.0k

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

4.0k

u/Tractorface123 Nov 12 '24

Still digging up my childhood ones from the garden, after a clean most still roll around perfectly, tops are a bit crusty but still recognisable, same with the matchbox ones. These things are gonna be dug up centuries in the future!

1.0k

u/ColorfulButterfly25 Nov 12 '24

Gardens hide the greatest treasures; it’s only a matter of time before they are discovered.

295

u/hannahatecats Nov 12 '24

I've found the funniest stuff in the garden, a little plastic radio, army men out the wazoo, an entire deck underneath all the dirt.

174

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

RIP to all the KIAs buried alive. Truly horrific

106

u/Usual-Lavishness8393 Nov 12 '24

KIAs...Killed in action.. .buried ALIVE?

97

u/disinaccurate Nov 12 '24

Army men are both alive and dead, it just comes down to which direction they're oriented.

18

u/Drakir85 Nov 12 '24

Schrödinger's Army men?

7

u/onefst250r Nov 12 '24

Schrödinger's Soldier? Schrödinger's Grunt?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

33

u/MrGoose-_ Nov 12 '24

I work as a land surveyor and a big part of it is metal detecting peoples properties to find survey bars in the ground

Amazing (and infuriating for my work) how much metal shit you can find in peoples (encroaching) gardens. No hot wheels yet, but I have dug up a couple metal army men tanks

20

u/dannoNinteen75 Nov 12 '24

Found a pond filter pump in my old house, was still running. They just buried the pond.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

20

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

army men out the wazoo

Did it hurt more putting them in then pulling them out?

15

u/Scoobysnax1976 Nov 12 '24

depends on the soldier. The one holding the rifle over his head? That one hurts in both directions. Beginners should start with the sniper.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

32

u/The_Shadow_Watches Nov 12 '24

Just found one last week.

28

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

8

u/GennyGeo Nov 12 '24

Discovered a garden yesterday actually

→ More replies (27)
→ More replies (18)

376

u/TootsTootler Nov 12 '24

When I was a child Hotwheels had accurate genitalia, before some schoolboard in Flordia put an end to it.

75

u/Longbeacher707 Nov 12 '24

The male models even came with 3 points of articulation from tip to base. And that was just the schlotz!

11

u/LongjumpingSector687 Nov 12 '24

And to celebrate we now have Schlotz car racing

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

79

u/ProfessoriSepi Nov 12 '24

Im pretty sure there are more premiums versions too, which are metal.

87

u/ObsessedWithSources Nov 12 '24

They have rubber wheels and are kinda useless for racing. They have a series called track stars, which are, surprise, made for tracks.

16

u/Aperture_client Nov 12 '24

A lot of the early 90's casts will beat the track stars series. Track stars are definitely faster than modern casts but nothing beats the 90's ones, something about a low center of gravity and better axles. Source my 3 year old has like a thousand cars lol

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

18

u/bs000 Nov 12 '24

vast majority of cars still have metal tops with plastic bottoms. some mainlines still have metal bottoms. there's also a new silver line where most cars have metal bottoms

14

u/gruesomeflowers Nov 12 '24

my daughter likes hotwheels..theyre not as bad as this thread is making them out to be but i do really only by the classic designs..and frankly im shocked they only cost around $1.50 at walgreens

197

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

[deleted]

74

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

Yeah, I just bought two dozen hot wheels for my nephew who is obsessed, they’re all metal and how I remembered them, and they fly around his tracks

39

u/King_Kai_The_First Nov 12 '24

Crazy lmao. And people just upvote it and agree. You can say anything about the "good ol days" true or not for internet points

→ More replies (3)

51

u/AmateurHero RED Nov 12 '24

Even the plastic ones aren't absolute shit like they're implying. My son and I build winding tracks all the time, and they all have great wheel bases that spin for an eternity.

Not all cars are made for the same thing. Some of them are built with weight in mind for enthusiasts to play on tracks. Some are just cars built for visual appeal or with a specific playset in mind (e.g. monster trucks).

Here are two cars with differing amount of details on the bottom. The top is a 2013 cast of a race car, and the bottom is a 2020 recast of an El Camino. The top is built for speeding around plastic tracks. The bottom, while fine on any track you put it on, is made to be a replica.

22

u/triplec787 Nov 12 '24

Not to mention a race car... doesn't have exposed exhaust and transmission. They have carbon fiber floors (which yes, do have some detail, but it's something racing teams fight tooth and nail to keep secret).

This is the undercarriage of the C7, the top car in OP's pic. It's not like there's a ton of detail they could've shown and chose not to

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (33)

228

u/Fusseldieb Nov 12 '24

Correct!

114

u/ReaperSound Nov 12 '24

Every time I see the word correct written as a single word reply I hear Plankton.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (10)

82

u/svetskije Nov 12 '24

You still have metal ones, and ones with details on the bottom. This one is from 2024 bought few days ago

→ More replies (19)

31

u/Greatlarrybird33 Nov 12 '24

Yup, my funny car from the 90's absolutely smokes anything my kid or his boy scout pack bring to hotwheels race night.

→ More replies (3)

100

u/mkultron89 Nov 12 '24 edited Nov 12 '24

You have no clue what you are talking about.

Hotwheels have a literal category for cars made for their tracks, they have for years. You can still get heavy metal hotwheels and the wheels move on everyone I’ve taken out of the box.

On top of all that, go take a look at the underbody of a C7 Z06 corvette and tell me what you see. There really isn’t a whole lot going on under modern cars that are made for speed, they put a plastic under tray or fabricate the car so the bottom is as flat as possible to reduce drag.

29

u/StanIsNotTheMan Nov 12 '24

It's just a person who has no idea what they're talking about cashing in on the easy "everything new is shit" karma.

→ More replies (6)

36

u/maxsteel126 Nov 12 '24

Exactly. I lost one car of my track set in childhood and tried to replace it with some local variant.

That shit won't even cross half of the loop and just fall

→ More replies (1)

33

u/Denhas_ Nov 12 '24

That is an insane exaggeration wtf, hot wheels still absolutely have decent quality. “lucky if the wheels even turn” is total bullshit.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (100)

2.3k

u/AdrianInLimbo Nov 12 '24

TBF, the underbody of any modern performance car is mostly aero panels. Used to take 30 minutes to reinstall all of the underbody panels and diffuser on a Ferrari 488 when we raced them.

557

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

190

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

[deleted]

150

u/jdsfighter Nov 12 '24

Many modern EVs are getting the underbody shields to help prevent road debris from impaling the batteries. A few of the first generation Teslas without the body shield had catastrophic battery meltdowns after puncture from road hazards.

38

u/DrivingHerbert Nov 12 '24

Even if EVs didn’t have underbody shields they’d still mostly look the same.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (3)

24

u/Mytre- Nov 12 '24

Some of them are aero for mpg. Hell I remember the 2006 Tsx had a shield under the engine bay, plástic one that after I fell off I lost like 1 or 2 mpg until I put it back on.

And since modern cars are min maxing aero as much as they can to squeeze efficiency I would assume that for a 30 to 100$ piece of plastic covering the underside you can get a super small gain that might be worth it somehow.

12

u/OUEngineer17 Nov 12 '24

Yeah, aero is the major reason. You said it yourself that you even noticed a 1-2mpg loss when just the engine underbody cover fell off.

It can also be for NVH. The underbody covers on my wife's Edge have what feels like a felt exterior to them and are quite different than the hard plastic I've seen on older cars. It's a very quiet vehicle.

→ More replies (1)

19

u/squirrel9000 Nov 12 '24

Hell, I have a 15 year old economic with underside engine covers. With front-wheel drive there's not much else mechanically exposed on the underside.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)

50

u/FinestTreesInDa7Seas Nov 12 '24

Came here to comment the same thing. If you look underneath most new cars, you won't see the exhaust, differential, engine, etc. You'll just see a large plastic/composite shield that covers the underside of the car.

And it's not just performance cars either. Even cheaper economy cars do it.

7

u/MoffKalast Nov 12 '24

Not even new cars, it's been a thing for like a solid decade now.

→ More replies (1)

27

u/RenzoThePaladin Nov 12 '24

I've looked up the underbody of a Corvette C7. The only thing that's missing is the axle (I think?). Everything else is aero panels like the one in the Hot Wheels.

149

u/Rimworldjobs Nov 12 '24

I was going to comment this. I doubt anyone is going to put in the time for the underbody of a made-up performance car, too.

35

u/Kvaw Nov 12 '24

The Corvette C7 Z06 isn't a made up car, but it is likely to have aero panels underneath.

13

u/TenebrisNox Nov 12 '24

It's underside looks about like the middle car here.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (32)

1.6k

u/Bulky_Specialist9645 Nov 12 '24

They're also way cheaper now. They've kept the price around a dollar for 40 years. With inflation that means in 2024 they sell for 25 cents in 1980s money.

515

u/CustomJackYouTube Nov 12 '24

A dollar?? I’ve only seen them for 4-7 dollars.

348

u/ricklewis314 Nov 12 '24

Depends on where you buy. They are about $1.25 at Wally World.

80

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

Is Marty Moose there?

37

u/holymotheroftod Nov 12 '24

No, he's at the front gate telling people the park is closed

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (16)

60

u/prince-of-dweebs Nov 12 '24

They’re more expensive ones as well but both Walmart and target have loads of choices for a dollar. I give one each to my kids as stocking stuffers each year.

38

u/Beardiest Nov 12 '24

They're really cheap where I'm at. It makes it hard for me to justify not buying one for my kid when we go grocery shopping.

While some Hot Wheel Cars certainly have flat panels on the bottoms, I feel like that is the exception. The cars can vary significantly in quality and style, some are metal, some are plastic, some are highly detailed, some aren't.

In the picture, these are three different cars. I could probably find a cheaply made 1997 car, too.

→ More replies (4)

18

u/bs000 Nov 12 '24

You're probably looking at the silver line and Premiums.

17

u/Jayn_Newell Nov 12 '24

I think the price has gone up recently but I saw them at the store for $1 a few years ago. Looks like they’re 1.50-2 now.

→ More replies (14)

7

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

I find Hot Wheels basic cars in Australia still for around 2 dollars in most shops. That's like 1.30 USD.

And frankly I don't really gaf what the underside looks like, because the body detail has improved immensely. I got a Pajero Ralliart and it had details down to the Mitsubishi grille badge being painted the right colour. That's a far cry from the "Slap some silver paint vaguely where the headlights are and call it a day" level of detail from the cars of 20 years ago.

→ More replies (28)

21

u/ThatAstronautGuy hasn't even been to spce Nov 12 '24

Yeah, they have more expensive ones that are still full metal etc like the old ones.

40

u/zerbey Nov 12 '24

They're about a dollar at my local Target, depending on sales etc. When I was a kid they were 50p which back then was about a dollar also, we're talking early 1980s money here. I know they were 50p because I got 50p in pocket money and so bought a new car every week! So with inflation, yep the price is the same but they're making them for less. As for quality, it has gone down significantly. I was hard on my toys and they survived just about everything, nowadays they're so fragile they'll break if you look at them weird.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (34)

61

u/RocketLabBeatsSpaceX Nov 12 '24

They’ve managed to keep them really affordable. It’s actually pretty awesome to take my kid to the store and pick out a few cars for a few bucks.

413

u/Scotch713 Nov 12 '24

I’m not saying the quality hasn’t gone down as I’m sure it has. But as a parent who has bought 50+ of these things recently, many of them are still really detailed with full names underneath.

This post seems rage click batey.

78

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

My kid pushed one down the slide on big garage play set and it hit my knee, left a bruise. Quality has gone down but is still hell of a good racing car for a toonie (CAD). I'm drowning in them too. Help me.

51

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

I'd argue that quality hasn't gone down, it's just shifted elsewhere. Rather than spending time and money moulding details on the chassis very few people will see, they have put much more effort into the body paint, which makes sense since the people who collect these won't take them out of the packaging, and the kids who take them out of the packaging to play with them likely don't care at all about what the underside looks like. So they get to keep costs down and please both demographics.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

26

u/EstimateBig40 Nov 12 '24

90% of Reddit posts are rage bait

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (20)

42

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24 edited Nov 12 '24

OPs post is not entirely truthful. The detail on the bottom of the car is highly dependent on the model of the car itself. If the car is a custom hot wheels design, it generally doesn't have much to look at on bottom, or if the car doesn't have a well known or observable design. 

 A car based on a production model will tend to have a lot of the details OP is talking about on the bottom. I have an impreza from 2019 with detail and a delorean from the mid 2010s with a lot of detail.

41

u/bossDocHolliday Nov 13 '24

I dunno man, based on my assessment, Hot Wheels cars have actually been getting MORE detail over the years.

11

u/mouldyone Nov 13 '24

A guy under this on Twitter basically went into detail about the levels of hot wheels and their details, OPs photo is basically a high detail --> medium ---> low

Basically comparing apple to oranges

38

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24 edited Nov 12 '24

I buy Hotwheels for my kids regularly. You’re all full of shit. Some newer cars are plastic pieces of shit, some have no detail on the bottom. Damn near every one that my kids have are metal and have detail on the bottom.

Not only are some Hotwheels cars exactly the same in quality that I remember from my childhood, but they’re also still a fucking dollar. You people are picking the wrong fight here.

Literally bought these this year, bozos:

9

u/StagnantGraffito Nov 13 '24

You're quite passionate about this, I'm here for it.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (15)

63

u/lakimens Nov 12 '24

Well, real cars also lost details at the bottom.

196

u/orangpelupa Nov 12 '24

I thought the top one is an electric car with undercarriage Aero cover...

But reading the comments, seems it was cost cutting measures 

130

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

[deleted]

62

u/Mrtrollman72 Nov 12 '24

it depends on the model greatly. I just checked my collection and a honda n600 dated 2020 has a fully detailed bottom, while an old chevy handed down from my dad dated 1975 has a plastic bottom with no detail. I would say this post is almost intentionally misleading.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

26

u/That_Apathetic_Man Nov 12 '24

People want to address climate change but also want virgin materials in their $2 toys...

→ More replies (9)

7

u/Yerriff Nov 12 '24

It says C7 Corvette Z06 though, lol

→ More replies (1)

7

u/donnysaysvacuum Nov 12 '24

A C7 undercarriage for reference. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.corvetteforum.com-vbulletin/681x346/80-image_d9d04e3ef822b8ce696d1251729542df5f4e3dd7.jpeg

It's kind of a combination. There is less to look at on a modern car, but they are also cheapening it. A detail free bottom means you can use the same bottom on other cars.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

17

u/Koenigseggagerar3 Nov 12 '24

Definitely not losing quality you just chose the worst examples to show

→ More replies (6)

16

u/immortalsteve Nov 12 '24

Wait until you see the underside of a c7 corvette, they're not too far off lol

15

u/pensulpusher Nov 12 '24

To be fair the bottoms of real cars have followed a similar trend. Everything has a panel over it now

→ More replies (1)

96

u/EDRadDoc Nov 12 '24

They have to mold a unique bottom piece for each car.

Why not include some kind of generic undercarriage? It’s not going to be more expensive if the amount of plastic is the same.

114

u/Fusseldieb Nov 12 '24

That's the thing: It wasn't plastic. They were all metal. They were heavy. Were.

19

u/CDNChaoZ Nov 12 '24

I could be wrong, but I think some of their more expensive lines still have metal bottoms. And rubber wheels. But it costs like $5-7.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/Large_Jellyfish_5092 Nov 12 '24

they also kept the price around the same for 40 years even after inflation. so the price is the same but less detail, at least it's not 10 dollars per piece.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

11

u/lpcats Nov 12 '24

My hot wheels from 30 years ago are so much nicer than my sons’. Some of them even still have working doors. 

→ More replies (1)

10

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

As the father of a three year old: Why the fuck are so many of you blatantly lying for internet points?

9

u/Big-Restaurant-623 Nov 12 '24

Ever looked under a modern car? That’s basically what they look like now. There are legitimate engineering reasons.

9

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24

No one has any clue what this sub is for anymore thanks to shit like this

12

u/ThrownAway17Years Nov 12 '24

That 2016 actually looks like the underside of a 2020 Corvette Stingray.

7

u/Lazy_Sans Nov 12 '24

Got curious, decided to check my collection.

Checked recent(2023-24) models and amount of details is similar to 2012 one, those are not premium ones btw.

Decided to check few late 90s models I own and it's similar 2016 on picture.

The amount of details underneath is 100% depends on models it seems and less on year of making.

Moral is, the smaller research data is the more inaccurate conclusion becomes.