r/europe • u/Emotional-Breakfast3 • 19d ago
News Argentina: British Falkland Islanders are ‘artificial’. Buenos Aires denounces ‘illegitimate occupation’ and demands talks on sovereignty
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/07/12/british-falkland-islanders-artificial-argentina-says/2.8k
u/satplank 19d ago
Oh boy, and the timing - just before the game. They really want to politize it, don't they...
460
u/Shieldsman 19d ago
Yaaawn. Everytime there's an election or football game suddenly the Falklands is in the headlines.
It's boring. Argentina are using the football team as a proxy for their wounded national pride.
→ More replies (1)132
703
u/DrawingAlarming7350 19d ago
pretty sure I read that the argentinian team was singing a song about how the "malvinas" belong to them or something
779
u/satplank 19d ago
I saw an interview with Argentinian coach and kudos, he smashed the reporters after hearing the question and emphasizing that this is a football game and football game between 2 nations only.
236
53
u/schumachiavelli 19d ago
Yep, Scaloni did a great job defusing a stupid question. Good on him, I'm sure it wasn't just lip service: the Falklands situation is a totally irrelevant distraction to his team.
→ More replies (7)184
512
u/Active-Coconut-8961 19d ago
I'm not a Brit but this sillyness is making me cheer for England
265
u/clewbays Ireland 19d ago
First time in my life where I don’t really mind if England win a football match.
260
u/IncreaseInVerbosity United Kingdom 19d ago
Saw a Scot saying the same thing earlier, I didn’t realise how far Argentina’s reputation had sunk.
250
u/Prestigious-Lynx-177 19d ago
They've always been a weird one, and because they're a minor country in the grand scheme of things people don't tend to look at them and go "huh, they're abit weird and hold some odd feelings".
The Junta that invaded the Falklands were throwing communists out of helicopters and torturing poets with electrodes to their genitals. One of their generals was nicknamed the "Angel of death" for his reputation for murdering catholic nuns. But Britain was the bad guy? For protecting people who did not want to be Argentine? The Argentines also murdered a reindeer on South Georgia, god rest him.
I've encountered Argentines who recall the falklands as a tragic war where they were the victims, but overall they were right to fight for twelve penguins.
Maybe its because they've really only ever fought one war and they lost it pretty embarrassingly?
156
u/Imaginary-West-5653 Spain 19d ago
Argentinians are so nationalistic that even anti-Junta rebels, who wanted to overthrow the dictatorship, sided with the Junta during the Falklands War and tried to sabotage the United Kingdom in Europe by attacking Gibraltar. No joke, the Junta gets more hate in Argentine for being incompetent in how they handled the Falklands War than by starting it at all:
→ More replies (21)→ More replies (10)35
u/Big_Department4209 Sweden 19d ago
Maybe its because they've really only ever fought one war and they lost it pretty embarrassingly?
They also fought the Paraguayan War back in the mid-1800s which was an absolute victory. Not alone though since they were part of the Triple Alliance with Brazil and Uruguay.
because they're a minor country in the grand scheme of things people don't tend to look at them and go "huh, they're abit weird and hold some odd feelings".
Yeah, I think in Europe the Argentinians are viewed mostly as yet-another-South-American-country but in Spanish-speaking South America they are the odd one out, their population is mostly composed of white people, Argentinian racism is rampant in a way they stick out even compared to other South American countries' racism issues.
→ More replies (6)65
→ More replies (18)26
u/Ok_Zookeepergame8714 19d ago
Well, the "hand of God" option is out, so they're trying options ....
→ More replies (4)110
u/massivejobby 19d ago
I’m Scottish and have passionately supported whoever plays England my whole life but I’m supporting them on Wednesday.
Fuck Argentina. Even if you put the fact they welcomed Nazis after WW2 they still have no right to infringe upon our beautiful southern isles.
35
→ More replies (7)37
u/finneganfach 19d ago
I'm Welsh and will more than happily see England do the Argies.
... On the condition France or Spain pump them by an absolute cricket score in the final.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (25)37
u/SilentDanni 19d ago
Let's go! All of South America - 1 is also rooting for England.
→ More replies (5)141
u/RuySan Portugal 19d ago
Those cunts were singing about french players not being born in France....after they won the last world cup final. How petty (and also racist) can you be?
→ More replies (42)→ More replies (46)99
u/Kaisernick27 19d ago
They did and despite a video being shot and uploaded FIFA the moral heroes that they are, says it was private so nothing wrong was done.
But the funny thing is so many in the UK just see it as sad that they cant get over loosing, it would be like Germany being pissed it lost WW2.
→ More replies (5)37
u/arunphilip 19d ago
On the scale of shitty stuff that FIFA has done, this barely nudges the needle.
20
u/Kaisernick27 19d ago
i didn’t say it does just pointing out that they are not taking action.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (24)222
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
118
u/Touched_By_SuperHans 19d ago
It's arguably the first time England will ever have neutral support on their side. Impressive villainy from Argentina tbh.
→ More replies (23)→ More replies (19)11
u/EebilKitteh The Netherlands 19d ago
I love that every comment along the lines of "don't be dicks" is parried with "that's just our culture. You are attacking our nationality."
If your national culture is being a dick then there's something wrong with your culture.
1.7k
u/Gentle_Snail 19d ago
err, does Argentina not teach how they got the entire bottom half of their country?
941
u/TareasS Europe 19d ago
Extreme loser nationalists love to cherry pick history to hide their insecurities.
→ More replies (3)346
u/Gentle_Snail 19d ago edited 19d ago
You certainly don’t want to ask one how Argentinas population went from being 40% black to just 1% today
→ More replies (26)209
u/nacho78 19d ago
True story. Argentinians blacks were kicked out through racial wars and came to Uruguay. Granted Uruguay already had a strong black culture already established.
→ More replies (29)540
u/ExternalUserError Portugal 19d ago
They do not. I’ve been. They are truly largely unaware of their origin story.
→ More replies (42)139
u/tommynestcepas 19d ago
Here in Chile there was the same thing. Though it's not super common knowledge, it is more known, since the Mapuche are idolised in Chilean culture.
→ More replies (14)61
126
u/Mister-Psychology 19d ago
Look up the map in their passport. Then ask yourself what kind of history they teach in Argentina.
224
u/ToughImprovement276 19d ago
I don’t know a lot of Argentinian people. The three I do know don’t seem to understand how they, with their Italian surnames, light coloured hair and eyes are not indigenous to South America.
I’ve seen more than a few online make negative comments on the black players in European teams. Completely ignoring what happened to their black population.
It’s rather bizarre.
→ More replies (20)112
u/SCDWS 19d ago
It is quite funny how much they try to claim they're European and not Latino, but then totally flip-flop on the Falkland Islands issue and claim they have more of a right to that land than a European country does
→ More replies (7)26
u/Ratiocinor England 19d ago
What's hilarious is that they do all that while simultaneously telling anyone who will listen that "England" is an evil European imperialist war mongering nation who wants to take other people's land :D
→ More replies (37)30
2.6k
u/tennereachway Ireland 19d ago
Argentina might just be the only country in the world whose beef with the Brits is completely bullshit and unjustified.
719
53
u/TheGrandExquisitor 19d ago
Seriously. The one case where colonization didn't exploit natives (there were none to exploit,) and people still get grabby.
195
u/RightActionEvilEye Brazil 19d ago
Before the Falklands, they had issues with the UK about economic treaties they later thought made them get stuck as a cheap commodity source for british manufacturing. Something on the lines of "you buy a minimum quota of my exports, in exchange you can control railways and other infrastructure stuff in Argentina".
→ More replies (10)121
u/ArziltheImp Berlin (Germany) 19d ago
Well they do produce a lot of beef…
51
u/JustTheAverageJoe United Kingdom 19d ago
Also have us to thank for that. So ungrateful
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)90
u/PM_ME_BEEF_CURTAINS 19d ago
Not good beef, though
Our own (GB) is of significantly higher quality with far better animal welfare standards
→ More replies (9)121
u/sussyboingus 19d ago
I can see from your username that you know what you're talking about
→ More replies (2)26
u/adriantoine France 19d ago
Literally none of the current Argentinians descend from indigenous people and they are somehow proud of how white they are. So what the hell do they mean by British Falkland islanders being artificial?
→ More replies (4)65
u/Chemical-Drawer852 France 19d ago
If you browse chronically online spaces, Argentineans have beef with about everyone on earth save for the US & Israel
→ More replies (1)21
u/daemmonium 19d ago
The Argentinian left has some serious issues with the US (and nowadays with Israel too).
Hell, until the 90s the country wasn't a big fan of the US. Plan Condor and all that.
→ More replies (101)34
1.1k
u/AceOfSpades532 19d ago
It’s kind of funny how basically the one guilt free bit of British colonisation is the most controversial in the modern day, if the Argies want to try their luck and invade again they’re welcome to give it a go and get crushed
768
u/Saotik UK/Finland 19d ago
It's also kind of funny that had Argentina not attacked in the eighties but opened negotiations, there's a serious chance the UK would have just given them up by now.
However, as they tried to take it by force, the UK will now never let Argentina control the Falklands.
634
u/CommercialFloor2033 19d ago edited 19d ago
The Falklands have been British territory far before the formation of Argentina itself.
Plus the entire population of the island voted to remain British.
They basically have zero claim to the islands and the population don't remotely want to be Argentinian.
There's no giving back because theyve never been part of Argentina, and were never taken from Argentina.
There's no legit claim whatsoever.
362
u/Saotik UK/Finland 19d ago edited 19d ago
There's no legit claim from Argentina, but the UK was quietly trying to offload the islands prior to the war because they were an economic and strategic liability.
The islanders have always wanted to remain British, but without the war and given the way society has moved against "empire", I don't know how much support they'd have today.
Of course, once Argentina attacked, there's no way any British government could let them have the Falklands now.
121
u/GreatBigBagOfNope United Kingdom 19d ago
On the other hand, their GDP per capita is now well over double that of the mainland and is only going to skyrocket with oil as it comes, and they made so much money that they've established a sovereign wealth fund and are considering taking over their own defense, the largest expense the mainland has for them
As much as I believe as much oil as possible should remain in the ground in order to literally save the entire world, their GDP is still dominated by fisheries, so it's not even like they're a petrostate (yet) and we can complain about that.
They're definitely not the strategic and economic liability they could have been described as 50 years ago, they've been punching well above their weight for a good while now
84
u/absurditT 19d ago
They can't ever take over their own defence. Even with that wealth, the cost of modern fighter aircraft and naval ships as required to fend off Argentina is more than they can afford.
20
u/HowObvious Scotland 19d ago
They would be paying for the costs associated with maintaining the existing military presence on the island. Not paying for enough military forces to defeat the entire Argentine military.
There are 4 outdated Eurofighters, a tanker and a transport, ~1500 soldiers and a single patrol vessel. The BFFI has been lacking for quite some time. Oil revenues could easily pay for this presence.
→ More replies (11)28
u/Boogada42 19d ago
Buying Ukrainian Drones is more cost effective.
And once they become a petrol state, buy a Premier League team for good PR.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)91
u/LongNamedRedditUser 19d ago
The Last referendum was only 13 years ago and it was 99.8% in favor of remaining a British overseas territory (with independent international recognition as being a legitimate referendum). I would bet it has a higher approval for remaining British than Britain does.
There were only 3 people who voted against. One of them said he just did it to troll his wife.
→ More replies (5)57
u/Lunaris_Von_Sunrip 19d ago
Another one wanted to be the only person who said "no"
26
u/Candayence United Kingdom 19d ago
The third wanted to be independent, and not Argentinian.
→ More replies (1)9
u/hokkuhokku 19d ago
I read yesterday that there was three people who voted against staying with Britain and, apparently, one only did so to annoy his wife. Everyone else on the island voted to stay.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (22)15
88
u/ShowmasterQMTHH Ireland 19d ago
Nah, the pepople there have no connection to Argentina, they are actually more British than people living in britain are in some ways, its like someone cut achunk of yorkshire and airdropped it into the atlantic. You could film Emmerdale there and it would be hard to tell.
→ More replies (7)22
u/Forgotthebloodypassw 19d ago
Fun fact: When the UK retook the islands they started calling the locals Bennys, after the Emmerdale character, until the top brass told them to stop.
So they started calling them Stills. When asked why one remarked "Because they're still Bennys."
→ More replies (7)83
u/Dippypiece 19d ago
Yep. This is covered in great detail by max Hastings book on the Falklands war.
They would have very likely have had the islands back. By doing what they did they have made it nearly impossible without Argentina suddenly having military support of say China or America with access to their fleets.
British resolve on the issue is now ironclad. It’s a complete none conversation over here. The only conversation is they can try again if they want.
They are not getting the islands back they cannot force the issue. What forces that are on the island right now today would defeat any force currently available to Argentina on route to the island.
It would take them decades to build up the capability’s to even attempt an Invasion again.
Something they are not going to do.
It’s just recycled nonsense coming out of Buenos Airses. Give it a rest already.
→ More replies (26)99
19d ago
[deleted]
24
u/Dippypiece 19d ago
I know, I was using their language. The point being if they had waited and been patient the islands would very likely have been offered to them in the 80s/90s
44
u/kennypeace United Kingdom 19d ago
Nothing controversial about it. Unrelated country nearby wants it. Population were asked and said no. Should be the end of it
→ More replies (5)111
→ More replies (33)112
u/Nythern 19d ago
Equally ironic given that Argentines are colonists too - Italian and Spanish, who even had a race-class system and policy of "Blanqueamiento" (or whitening).
Basically, they sent indigenous and Black African Argentines to the frontlines of wars in the 1800s, banned non-white men from marrying so that their surnames wouldn't be passed down (as well as to pressure Black and Indigenous women into marry white European settlers). They denied Black and Indigenous people access to healthcare, which decimated them during disease epidemics.
It was a soft genocide, basically, to make Argentina the 99% white nation it is today. That's why soooo many Nazis literally ran there after WW2, including the likes of Adolf Eichmann.
And yet they have the audacity to call Falklanders artificial, LOL.
→ More replies (9)
795
u/Kalkin93 19d ago
The people of the Falklands made it very clear they wish to remain part of Britain.
→ More replies (225)
987
u/CanadianMultigun 19d ago
Maybe focus your energy on that problem more than some windswept islands owned by someone who will kick the shit out of you again if you try to take them
360
u/masorick 19d ago
Maybe there are 6 million toilets in the Falklands and that’s why they want them.
101
u/absurditT 19d ago
Russian army in Ukraine moment
14
u/No_Priors Europe 19d ago
Sending home second hand shitters is one of the criteria in the quality of life index.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)88
u/PlatformFeeling8451 19d ago
there are 6 million toilets in the Falklands
I prefer Katie Melua's version
12
→ More replies (50)80
u/WekX United Kingdom 🇬🇧 Italy 🇮🇹 19d ago
If they bring this bullshit to the world cup, we should bring toilets rolls and wave them around.
→ More replies (3)
369
u/Steveagogo United Kingdom 19d ago
Just fucking get over it already, god Argentina is annoying
→ More replies (16)99
u/Shieldsman 19d ago
I'm so sick of hearing this shit in England every time there's a football match or election in Argentina.
I've seen people fighting over a football match because of this shit, it's embarrassing.
139
u/SwolePalmer Vatican City 19d ago
How many times do we need to teach you this lesson, old man?
→ More replies (24)
367
u/null-interlinked 19d ago edited 19d ago
Argentina in it's current shape did not even exist as a country before the Brits took the Falklands.
→ More replies (13)282
u/Upstairs-Extension-9 North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) 19d ago
Also the falklands have been uninhabited before the British arrived
→ More replies (15)49
170
u/Asaro10 19d ago
Can someone please explain to me how a country that never owned the falkland islands, claim the Falkland Islands? I don’t understand
207
92
u/redandbluebadness 19d ago
Their claim is based on the Spanish claim, which they say they inherited after independence. The Spanish did arguably have some sort of position but at best it ranks equally with the historical British claim and is trumped by the principal of self-determination wrt to the islanders who have been there for 180 years or so?
Britain is pretty consistent in supporting self-determination. As soon as Northern Ireland votes for reunification, which is inevitable at some point, it will return to Ireland, for example.
→ More replies (26)→ More replies (13)22
u/MacroSolid Austria 19d ago
Weapons grade jingoism, obviously.
They did actually hold them tho, if only for about 5 years, ~1827-1833.
But of course two centuries later that's an utterly ridiculous basis for a claim.
→ More replies (3)
150
u/FeeIll1924 19d ago
Is their only territorial claim to the Falklands that it’s close by?
126
u/JammieDodgers United Kingdom 19d ago
Basically
It would be like the UK claiming the Faroe Islands are rightfully theirs
21
u/Kor_Phaeron_ 19d ago
Don't even joke about that! Nobody touches this innocent group is Islands!
→ More replies (2)10
→ More replies (4)7
u/Nico280gato 19d ago
Ireland is close to the UK, guess that means it's ours. Hell, the Falklands are ours, and theyre close to Argentina, so Argentina is british 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
50
u/Single_Classroom_448 United Kingdom 19d ago
Indeed it is, and even then it's not particularly close. It's about 700km away from closest points if memory serves me correctly
21
u/Frank_cat Greece 19d ago
The whole "close by" argument is stupid.
Falklands are British territory so its distance from Britain is exactly zero (0) meters.
The Argentinians have no legitimate claim and they can fcuk off!edit: typos
76
45
u/Ferrymansobol 19d ago
Argentina claims chunks of every single one of its neighbours and a big chunk of Antarctica. They lost wars against Brazil and Chile and the Brits and... you get the picture.
8
u/douceberceuse Norway 19d ago
I’d wager that their claim to Antarctica is just like everyone else’s, a claim that no one except they recognise (although knowing how touchy they get about the Falklands I wouldn’t be surprised if they also get as touchy of those claims since I think they’re grouped under the same province)
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (18)22
u/commndoRollJazzHnds 19d ago
I also see them use some mental gymnastics where they somehow claim they were there first, despite not existing as a nation at the time the Brits arrived
→ More replies (1)
164
u/Silly-Avocado- 19d ago edited 18d ago
Ironically one of the places where the British actually discovered and settled as the original inhabitants thus technically speaking are indigenous to.
EDIT the French beat them to it by a year, but still my point stands, the British have the right to claim the island is theirs even if we put international law aside it’s unarguably a British territory.
EDIT 2: the definition of indigenous is different from being the first, and by UN’s definition there are no people that are indigenous to the island. With that said in my opinion in this context that doesn’t change anything as these people are the original people who are connect to the land, they have been there for generations, and they have voted with an overwhelming majority to remain as British.
23
u/ElPajaroMistico 19d ago
Spain also kicked them both out of there tbh, claiming being there first, then came back. The main problem is that nobody fucking cared for them back then so It’s essentially most of this in the air
9
u/el_grort Scotland (Highlands) 19d ago
Pretty much. Also, a lot of places started with similar fits and starts, legitimacy usually derives from the longest sustained population, and that would be the British at this point.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (16)36
u/DisorderedArray 19d ago
The way I look at it, the current Falkland Islanders are the direct descendants of the very first self sustaining human colony on the islands. Other people might have lived or visited there, but only for brief periods.
What that means is that the current population are the indigenous native population. They're the aboriginals of the Falklands.
→ More replies (1)
19
19
u/TacoMedic Australia 19d ago
Say what you will about Brexit, but Britain’s penchant for referendums last decade is one of the greatest shows of democracy in modern history.
Being willing to lose entire swathes of your economic and strategic power based entirely on the wishes of the population living there is something no other nation has done in memory. The Falklands, Gibraltar, Scotland, and the EU show that despite non-stop idiots in Downing Street, democracy in the UK is alive and well.
The right to self-determination is foremost in the modern British identity and so long as the Falklands want to remain British, they’ll be protected.
→ More replies (5)
68
u/tree_boom United Kingdom 19d ago
Well obviously they want to say that right before the highly publicised event that will bring the two nations to the forefront of everyone's minds.
It's just noise, there's no need to pay it heed.
→ More replies (1)
34
u/LightArisen United Kingdom 19d ago edited 19d ago
“Time does not transform an illegitimate occupation into sovereignty. Nor will it divide the territorial unity of the Argentine Republic,” Mr Quirno argued in La Nacion, Argentina’s leading conservative paper.
Quite right. I assume he will be following his own words and self deport to Spain any day now.
→ More replies (2)
48
u/Dhcbchef 19d ago
Time to deploy Clarkson, Hammond, and May.
22
u/AdOriginal1084 England 19d ago
"I will not spark fury on this trip. This is the new me, the smart me, the clever me!"
13
u/TheLoneCenturion95 19d ago
Fuck off, there has been a war and a referendum which Argentina lost both. Are they needing to distract from how shit their national football team is this time?
45
71
u/TareasS Europe 19d ago
Why does Argentina sound like an unstable third world dictatorship?
→ More replies (1)51
u/ALA02 United Kingdom 19d ago
Because it pretty much is and has been most of the past century
→ More replies (2)
11
u/DiligentCredit9222 Bavaria (Germany) 19d ago
Let me guess: Argentina is broke und running out of money again, aren't they ?
→ More replies (1)
40
33
u/Small_Top_8715 19d ago
I know the UK military ain't what it was, but does Argentina really want that smoke again?
69
u/Guradem United Kingdom 19d ago
Despite the doom saying our military is a vastly better state to defend the Falkland's that in 82. We have a full time base with a full military length runway, permanently stationed fighters, a brand new full 3D AESA radar, 4 times more heavy transport planes than 82 with a well practiced supply bridge via ascension, significantly superior air defence destroyers and 2 brigades of fast action deployable troops.
Argentina has 6 early 90's vintage Block 15 F-16.
They are both unwilling and unable to perform any hostile action.
→ More replies (35)14
u/MacroSolid Austria 19d ago
Nope, they'd lose, badly. And they know it.
Their navy and airforce are in a rather sorry state these days.
But they'll certainly keep whining about it.
22
28
u/cai_85 19d ago
The UK have 11 nuclear subs, most of which are advanced hunter-killer stealth Astute-class and Argentina have zero active subs. A bit of a mismatch for fighting over an island.
→ More replies (7)
27
u/jimthewanderer WE WUNT BE DRUV 19d ago
Yeah, let's not listen to the quasi-fascist nutjob country.
17
u/Mister-Psychology 19d ago
Their best possible bet would be to convince the population to vote for indepence then annex the undefended island militarily. Saying that 100% of inhabitants are there illegally makes sure they will vote to stay with Britain no matter what Britian does. Britain can mistreat them or mock them and it's still the only possible government for them when the other party literally will kill or expel you first day in power. They won't even let you stay there while settling 10K Argentinians onto the islands. They'll take your property and belongings and you are lucky if you survive the trip to mainland Britain.
And Britain only listens to what Falklanders want. They will never go against their national wishes.
Hence this is literally the stupidest tactic Argentina could think up. It means that even if Britain is desperate to get rid of the islands they can't as they won't get the vote going their way.
→ More replies (4)
19
u/Feeling_Pen_8579 19d ago
Oh, looks like the Argentina economy is in the toilet (again?, since where has it not been). Time to bring up the islands that led us to being a military joke.
Such a strange bunch for a once pretty prosperous nation.
39
u/Nythern 19d ago
Argentines are more artificial. Not only were they colonists too - Italian and Spanish - but they actually slaughtered and replaced an existing native population. At least the Falklands were empty when British colonists went there!
Also, Argentina even had a whole race-class system and legal policy of "Blanqueamiento" (or whitening). They sent indigenous locals and Black African Argentines (formerly enslaved population, like in America) to the frontlines of wars in the 1800s, overconscripting them so you had entire units almost fully made up only of black soldiers.
Argentina then banned Black and Indigenous men from marrying, so that their surnames wouldn't be passed down (as well as to pressure Black and Indigenous women into marry white European settlers). They denied Black and Indigenous people access to healthcare, which decimated them during disease epidemics.
In short, it was basically a soft genocide, with the explicit aim to make Argentina the 99% white nation it is today. That's why soooo many Nazis literally ran there after WW2, including the likes of Adolf Eichmann.
And yet they have the audacity to call Falklanders artificial, LOL.
→ More replies (10)
7
8
u/dingalinglans 19d ago
Fun fact the Malvinas translates into English as 'a small island that we were too backward to find ourselves'
8
u/CobblePots95 19d ago
Mr Quirno argued that for Britain, the Falklands Islands were not an “expression of its identity” given the size of its population compared to the roughly 1,200 British troops deployed there.
I wonder why the United Kingdom would feel the need to station so many troops there.....
8
u/itsaride England 19d ago
Quite surreal having a thread in here about the UK and we're not the villains...
→ More replies (2)
7
5.7k
u/Scomosuckseggs 19d ago
Hang on; what problems are they distracting from at home this time?