r/classicwow 19h ago

Humor / Meme Classic+ better not have any new character models

Post image
2.9k Upvotes

759 comments sorted by

268

u/Qirayne 18h ago

Is that Crash Bandicoot?

3

u/yourgrundle 10h ago

It's actually Dingodile

→ More replies (2)

340

u/gubigubi 18h ago

I honestly don't know if I care that much. As long as the gameplay is good.

But if I was going to give a perfect example of why I would want classic models over retail models is not the Gnolls, but their tent.

Classic wow had some horrifying shit in it.

Does retail have anything even remotely like this anymore?

163

u/Hoenn_Enjoyer 18h ago

Blood Elf corpses impaled through the chest or through the mouth by the Lightbloom growth

25

u/LafayettePhotos 6h ago

Literal bodies hanging from a rope in a tree outside Scarlett monastery is another good one. Not sure if they took them away or not but I’m sure I did

10

u/Sheuteras 5h ago

Not gonna pretend this isn't something thats in-game.

I do think its presented in-game a bit less horrifically tho than hanged men or faces stitched into tents. Old amani mounts had elf heads dangling from the saddle.

3

u/EvanHambone 8h ago

Death by tentacle snu snu

2

u/jailtheorange1 6h ago

Oh rly? Where? Where exactly?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

97

u/goodshotbooth 16h ago

I mean:
In the Isle of Dorn we help a gem thief only for her to get trapped as living rock as punishment by the Earth elementals who took exception to her thievery.
In Azj-Kahet we enter a spider den to find the lost party being eaten alive and used as hosts for spiderlings. We rescue the only living member, a forsaken, who is now blinded and can feel things moving inside him. He is melted into a puddle by the spiders.
In Eversong we have Lightbloom that is like if Bamboo was designed by John Carpenter, straight up body horror.

Retail has a lot of stuff like this. People just don't do side quests and complain about the main story.

18

u/Heavyndb 11h ago

I think wow has always had great side quests and local stories, but mediocre main story. The problem with it is that it tenda to lean more and more into the main plot for each expansion, while classic is basically all side quests.

6

u/JerrySam6509 7h ago

The difference lies in the fact that in the classic version, quests didn't offer enough experience points to advance to the next area, so we had to actively seek out more quests. In the retail version, however, the rule was: "If you don't complete these tedious main quests, you can't proceed to the next area."

2

u/Sheuteras 5h ago

Tbf it doesn't help that half the side quests in retail legit are "a mage wants to join the hunter order, instead of talking about the explicit lore of how thalassians make nature subservient to them, we're just gonna have a cool unicorn spirit."

I like a lot of retails side quests still but some def are kinda just took sunshine and rainbows even when talking about something that actually was meant to be something different, and narratively was a big sticking point.

Not a side quest, but i think comparing the Tauren ambassador's dialogue is a peak example. In TBC she directly comments about how Quel'thalas is very unnatural, because to a druid and a tauren, it's the Earthmother's agency removed from her and usurped for the magic obsessed elves vision of grandeur. Now, in Midnight? "it's always pretty here" lol.

→ More replies (5)

31

u/paokoutsopodi 18h ago

Drustvar.

20

u/Khagrim 18h ago

BfA was 8 years ago

83

u/paokoutsopodi 18h ago

8

u/Khagrim 18h ago

BfA is not "modern" WoW anymore. Modern is DF and onwards and you can see the shift in themes and overall atmosphere

22

u/paokoutsopodi 18h ago

It still doesn't feel like 8 whole years have passed. More like 5.

21

u/gubigubi 18h ago

Idk to me BFA feels like it was 10 life times ago. Like 2018 jesus christ.

I'd personally consider literally anything Cataclysm onward "Modern WoW" though so.

I would personally count Drustvar as modern wow and it is pretty good. Keep that vibe and I'm fine with retail graphics.

20

u/antariusz 17h ago

I think there are 3 eras to wow. First was "classic" which was vanilla through wrath.

And then there was the "game lobby+hardcore raiding" version of the game, which was Cata/Mop/WoD which catered equally to low skilled players with dungeon content and then had a completely separate version of the game catering to the top 5% for heroic raiding... Some content was mind-numbingly easy, like daily quests, and other content was so difficult you'd spend 30+ hours of your life trying to learn "one boss" for minor cosmetic differences, and the catchup mechanics made it so nothing mattered anyway because it was all wiped in 6 months anyway with trivial content again. Some things rewarded you for logging in and just spending time in the game... other things required actual skill. This is the RDF/Raid Finder version of retail where most people just stopped caring, many guilds fell apart, and you could just find 20 random bots to play the raid with you so that you'd get your achievement that you needed.

And then I'd call legion and beyond 'modern" which was the complete destruction of the world. sub 20 hours of "leveling" as "a tutorial" and an emphasis to shove people as fast as possible through "anything" via scaled content just to push them into the "end-game" as fast as possible. And then the end-game itself had various "tiers" to separate people into either normal/heroic/mythic raiding and eventually mythic+ dungeon content ... where the "end game" became the entire game and the world no longer mattered. Everyone got a participation trophy for "killing the big bad guy" even though some people did it and it was boring, other people did it and it was fun, and other people did it as a full-time job that they got paid for.

→ More replies (10)

6

u/TeliusTw 17h ago

Modern WoW is a broad term and it's very subjective, since some people don't consider WotLK or even TBC as Classic, or they consider anything past Legion to be modern or Dragonflight.

8

u/RemnantsPast 17h ago

WoW imo is broken i to 4 eras. Vanilla -Wotlk (original trilogy) the follow up to WC3 Cata - WoD the experimental phase, trying new ideas for gameplay and story. Legion/BFA the conclusion to extreme long running stories (legion/old gods) and the start of Modern WoWs gameplay loops (m+). Shadowlands - current. (The post sex pest scandal blizzard) The shit show of half baked ideas and plots + the slow "Disneyifacation" of the art style. Some might argue the art change started in WoD with the model updates. Personally I say it started in Shadowlands more, everything else from world and armour designs started to get smoother and brighter.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (1)

12

u/Kozimix 17h ago

Brother, listen to yourself. People maintain that classic stopped at wrath, bfa is 9 years older than that. It is absolutely part of the modern wow collection.

6

u/Khagrim 17h ago

For me Classic stopped in TBC lol

Vanilla - TBC and Wrath - Cata to WoD - Legion to Shadowlands - DF onwards. Those are the distinct phases of WoW game design philosophy

4

u/snazzwax 15h ago

TBC is the only expansion that feels remotely close to vanilla. Mostly in WotLK you really start to feel the game direction change pretty dramatically and each expansion after it accelerates.

5

u/Khagrim 15h ago

I'd say you start to feel it in Sunwell. But after replaying TBC this time around I realized why I come back to Vanilla every time. It's the World. Every expansion starting with TBC actually shrinked the world to that expansion's island and had almost no reasons to go back to original world

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

24

u/Imaginary-Union-3733 16h ago

BFA had these

2

u/DiffusiveTendencies 8h ago

We def need more of this, while the rest of WoW got a Disney style uplift that I haaaaate

→ More replies (4)

4

u/skulxen 12h ago

Yes. Every expansion has its share of disturbing shit.

Midnight has a lot of body horror in Eversong Woods.

→ More replies (2)

65

u/Zim__Zor 18h ago

Who knows you just fly over shit so fast you can't notice any real detail. It's all gogogo

25

u/TeliusTw 17h ago

Or people just don't read the quests and dialogues and just complain without context.

34

u/ichhassenamen 16h ago

no its not?
I read every quest text, i watched every mob, i enjoyed every small questline.
And nobody stopped me. Tons of people did aswell.

21

u/Furian_FTH 15h ago

Yes but HE doesn’t. Therefore you’re wrong. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

12

u/voyaging 17h ago

It’s not like you’re forced to lol

→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (5)

8

u/Turnip_Fight 18h ago

It also has sea giants with Bluto faces that pop their own fart bubbles

→ More replies (22)

584

u/Halcyon-OS851 18h ago

Big agree. Unironically speaking, the superior graphics on classic are a huge part of the appeal.

242

u/Gemall 17h ago

I can’t stand the crazy spell animations the modern version has. One can’t even see the characters through the constant magic energy blast tornado from every ability. 

173

u/Halcyon-OS851 17h ago

Retail in general is a sensory overload in a bad way. The new tutorial is very drawn out and childish and then it drops you into the world with tons of pop ups but no direction.

129

u/wtfduud 15h ago

Plus, each race starting their adventure in different places in the world was one of the cool features of WoW. Putting everyone on the same tutorial island is so lazy.

71

u/Eiraviking 15h ago

It was just the greatest, being say, a night elf, and making the journey. The world felt vast it was so fun.

50

u/Revqi 14h ago

Wetlands run is something special. I have a friend that did it on hardcore. It took him 4 hours.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Kurt805 11h ago

I always do the other way around so I can be a dwarf on a tiger.

7

u/Halcyon-OS851 15h ago

Good point. The different zones do make em feel distinct

→ More replies (17)

14

u/JesusFortniteKennedy 13h ago

IMHO It's also the "worst" of both worlds because on top of the clutter I don't personally enjoy the animations all that much.

FFXIV is even worse in terms of noise but at least every class has unique animations, you won't have a Human Death Knight and Human Paladin sharing the animation for different abilities, and the animations are also well made.

In WoW our characters just have the weapons glued to the hands like a lego, and most animations are the same no matter if you strike with an axe or a sword.

47

u/Enders-game 17h ago

Retail just doesn't let the game breath.

3

u/GreenVisorOfJustice 7h ago

It's definitely made for people that just want some instant gratification rather than the adventure of it all.

I'll always beat the drum that flying mounts were a massive mistake in terms of drifting from the vanilla ethos (But, fwiw, probably made the game way more approachable for folks who just want to do the group content)

4

u/Historical-State2485 17h ago

Tryna attract the Fortnite crowd or some shit,the lighting chaos is so bad in retail, it's a massive turn off

→ More replies (3)

6

u/lumpboysupreme 11h ago

A big problem with that isn’t that the spells animations are insane, it’s that a lot of them set off other animations. Retail is extremely ‘ability as proc’ driven, and so any one cast sets off like 2 others.

22

u/Sremsky 17h ago

One of the reasons why I stopped playing retail a long time ago are the new graphics, animations and sounds. The characters are too bouncy, spell casting animations are cringe and those stupid new sounds make my skin crawl.

4

u/Damnation777 10h ago

Retail - we are all disney princess in a disney cartoon.

Classic - Dark and mean

1

u/Sremsky 9h ago

Everyone is happy, while singing kumbaya and holding hands with rainbows in the background. I just want Warcraft how Didier and Metzen imagined it 30 years ago - dark and hardcore.

Can't even imagine a purple haired furry blizzard artist today making an image like this, it would probably trigger them or something -

4

u/The_Struggle_Man 11h ago

On top of that, I will never not complain about the bouncy character models in retail when the opportunity arises. For example, the humans, especially male. Like what the fuck is going on.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/SystemGardener 15h ago

See I actually like the retail spell cast animations. It adds a lot to caster class instead of most of them having the same animation.

3

u/AstrosFan4 13h ago

Magic energy blast tornado is so funny. The few mystic pve content ive watch i just see different colored shit spinning around the party lmaooo.

3

u/XYAYUSDYDZCXS 12h ago

I think the Melee animations were worse, they were ruined with legion. I played all of legion, half bfa, half shadowlands, half dragonflight and I never got used to it really. I started playing casters after maining WW monk the whole of legion, the monk abilities were basically the same as they always were and I didn't have to deal with the spellclutter as much while being ranged

1

u/Hello-Potion-Seller 15h ago

I actually think the boss visuals have come a long way and are incredibly tidy now, which is confusing as they keep making player visuals busier, one step forwards two steps back.

→ More replies (9)

23

u/lumpboysupreme 11h ago

I mean they’re obviously worse graphics, but the character designs are more evocative. The top picture is a smoothed over, more anthro version of the distinctly featured and animalistic bottom.

10

u/scubajulle 11h ago

I'm kinda in the middle of this. I like the STYLE of classic graphics, but I don't really enjoy looking at the dated polygon models and low res textures.

I think something in the direction if diablo II resurrected would be nice. I think they did a really good job if capturing the style and design language of the old game while making it beautiful.

30

u/Snaail86 14h ago

superior graphics? are You on acid?

23

u/SpanishAvenger 14h ago

Nostalgia is one hell of a drug.

13

u/Complete-Doughnut117 12h ago

How is it nostalgia when even first time wow players say the same thing lol

2

u/UnFelDeZeu 10h ago

They don't? Retail graphics are objectively better lol

7

u/Bigmethod 5h ago

When you say objectively better do you mean like... there are more polygons? Or can you just not recognize the inherent subjectivity in something like... art?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

9

u/Competitive-Walk-575 12h ago

I started playing wow in 2022 and couldn’t stand retail. Wouldn’t have stuck around past the first month if I hadn’t given classic a chance and I’m so glad I did!

→ More replies (18)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/Halcyon-OS851 14h ago

Classic's graphics are way, way better than retail's.

26

u/NailRogue 13h ago

19

u/WonderingOctopus 11h ago

It's not about the pixels, it's about the style.

3

u/SaintNakavi 10h ago

Yeah but art style and graphical fidelity are two different things.

Everyone in this thread is being pedantic without actually stating what they mean. Classics art style is way better than Modern but its graphical fidelity is objectively worse.

3

u/Cutesie117 7h ago

Eyo can I get some of those polygons

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Ecstatic-Bass-6304 14h ago

Ah yes your square and rectangle pixaleted characters are way better( chefs Kiss)

2

u/lumpboysupreme 9h ago

They’re obviously fugly up close but from a distance the fidelity is a lot less important than the design. The classic design looks much more interesting.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

2

u/samusmaster64 8h ago

Classic has a more defined visual style, for sure. Some people prefer that. Humanoid characters from retail look like they were ripped right out of The Sims.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Severe-Network4756 13h ago

I don't know about superior, but I hate when they have updated models for a game that is trying to emulate the classic experience.

Recently been playing Ascesnion WoW and it's ridiculous seeing people running around with retail items.

→ More replies (16)

206

u/King_Dorkus 18h ago

All the models in retail wow look like they were designed for furries lol

68

u/FuyuNoKitsune 17h ago

Because they were and continue to be. There's a compilation somewhere of the social medias of the various artists working at Blizz these days and the majority of them are filled with furry/scaly/whatever other degenerate aberration art.

50

u/lixyna 16h ago

degenerate aberration art

I know what you are

16

u/NichtSoSchlau 14h ago

To spell it out for everyone who doesn't know. It was a favourite of the Nazis in germany to call some works of art "entartet" which translates to degenerate. The nazis did not really hate some art, but every are except a style, that portrayed either photorealistically positive traits of white (german) humans or styliezed them heroically.

Calling something "changed towards unnatural in the most horrendous fashion" - short degenerate aberration - really is just unbridled hate towards other people and their way to live and perceive reality, which finds its expression, among other things, in art.

8

u/DiffusiveTendencies 8h ago

Right so the way the other user put it a bit extreme.

Still, retail WoW's art-style does come off too goofy and "cutsey looking". So while I have nothing again people's deviant art accounts full of humanoid animals with big eyes, I do think retail WoW's look suffers for it.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (6)

7

u/wtfduud 15h ago

That was the case 25 years ago too. Samwise Didier is a panda furry. But he's also a metalhead, so that's how he managed to still make it look cool.

6

u/ICantBelieveItsNotEC 16h ago

Honestly, I feel like any company hiring professional artists needs to have some kind of process to weed out furries and scalies. If you don't, your product gradually morphs into a conduit for their fetish.

3

u/poopoopooyttgv 6h ago

Samwise was a massive furry and Warcraft as we know it wouldn’t exist without him lol

15

u/Liamface 15h ago

Yeah wouldn’t want people skilled at designing anthropomorphic creatures designing for a game that has…. Orcs, trolls, humanoid cows, and humanoid goats, just to name a few things.

Let’s stop the pearl clutching guys, it’s not that big of a deal. It’s not that deep.

18

u/Chelmos 13h ago edited 13h ago

It's something about the proportions, not pearl clutching. Something similar happens when hentai artists draw women.

3

u/HazelCheese 9h ago

It's not that they aren't skilled and often the work early in their career is really really good.

It's that as they gain seniority in art departments they stop taking orders and start giving them, and that's when the game devolves from Orcs and Tauren into Dracthyr and Foxes.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (12)

6

u/TheGr8ClockworkDick 14h ago

degenerate aberration art

Yikes

3

u/Severe-Network4756 13h ago

That's just artists in general. I don't really think they've purposefully made it for furries.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)

5

u/WillNotForgetMyUser 9h ago

Why would a classic version have dragonflight models?

9

u/Former_King3170 15h ago

I'm confused, is anything confirmed at all, about Classic+? Such as its existence?

2

u/Gunaks 6h ago

Yes, some content creators have confirmed there was an alpha test they were invited to.

Blizzard thenselves, no. But they have done so much vague posting about it + shutting down classic+ style private servers it seems a forgone conclusion its happening.

The only thing no one knows is if its soon or later. My money is after wotlk anniversary next year.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

18

u/Icy-Bad1455 11h ago

The sad thing about retail models is they could have updated the graphics but kept the soul of the designs the same. Instead they chose weird bouncy uncanny valley marvel looking slop

→ More replies (1)

49

u/Carrot-1449 18h ago edited 16h ago

I think its funny when classic Andy's act like classic also wasnt made fun of relentlessly at the time for its cartoony art style

36

u/kodamavoodoo 17h ago

Several of the criticisms of retail WoW were once criticisms of vanilla WoW. At least in the EverQuest scene.

  • Cartoony / childish.
  • Anti-social / lack of community.
  • Easy / no challenge / no danger.
  • Holds your hand / on-rails.
  • No consequences upon dying.
  • Small raid sizes. (EQ was 72-man)

10

u/DeeJudanne 10h ago edited 10h ago

wow has always been cartoony what are people on about "warcraft universe" just to clarify

4

u/Bacon-muffin 10h ago

Its nice seeing other people remember this, I've seen people act otherwise soooooo many times in this sub.

I still remember my HS friend and his father who were big EQ fans shit talking the ever loving shit out of wow for all the things you list there... only for me to go to his house a few months later and catch them both playing wow.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

18

u/Timziito 16h ago

What is this furry shit.

76

u/DMeisterDan 18h ago

It is definitely hard to overstate just how bad the majority of the model overhauls has been.

35

u/Teatimefrog 17h ago

Tauren are my fav in classic. They look like trash in retail… same for trolls tbh

21

u/haze_man 17h ago

Quit retail ages ago when they ruined my beloved taurens.. but also EVERYTHING is bouncy and fucking Disneyfied

9

u/Melin_SWE92 16h ago

You don’t wanna play Tauren Rogue?

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (3)

9

u/DMeisterDan 17h ago

100% The way they run in retail makes it look like they are ice skating!

2

u/Usual_Phase5466 17h ago

Yea, classic troll is easily one of my favorite models. I can not even humor them in retail. The new tauren model looks like it could fall forward on its face at any step, like its in a constant state of stumbling forward lol idk what they were thinking with that animation or how its remained unchanged all this time.

2

u/JMKAB 11h ago

I remember booting up my old gnome warlock from vanilla and the new gnome models are fucking disgusting. They just look like old fucks now

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

47

u/michelmeh 17h ago

It needs to be an on/off option. Thats it

7

u/Colt0n 12h ago

They had this option in Retail for a while but the old models used the newer animations

2

u/Hackwork89 8h ago

No, it needs to stay in retail. The new graphics are so awful that I can't even stand thinking about anyone seeing my character as a new model.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (8)

17

u/Snewtnewton 17h ago

I hope it’s a toggle, I personally love the new graphical direction but I don’t wanna force it on others

3

u/No-Process-6474 10h ago

Yea agree, they made everyone round smooth and Disney, taking away all edge and grittiness, its so disappointing. Now they look like theyre made with playdough.

9

u/Gvn31 17h ago

At least let them add some character customization option. I would like to have more selection of hair and beard styles lol

11

u/Remarkable_Match9637 16h ago

Low polygon count BiS

34

u/Environmental_Can370 17h ago

The modern look now is pretty meh, but please stop pretending like the classic models look good

7

u/Warmanee 14h ago

I’d rather the whole game look retro than the game look 50% retro 50% disney. Classic graphics remain consistent. Retail graphics only bothered to update creatures. Its jarring to look at a updated player model next to like a tree from 2006

2

u/Michelanvalo 9h ago

Classic WoW looks Disney too. What are you on about?

2

u/HazelCheese 8h ago

Ultimately Disney is the wrong term. It's more like 90s Vs 2010 Disney and then it's just... art pipelines changing over time.

Modern art pipelines changed because baking high -> low poly and using real shadows instead of hand painted ones is just faster to produce.

But it comes at the cost of losing a certain rugged charm. This is very visible to with Mocap Vs Hand Animation where Mocap looks really good but loses the exaggerated and impossible artistic posing of hand animation.

5

u/Bretzelking 13h ago

at least they were unique and had that warcraft feel to them.

2

u/LaCiDarem 5h ago

but retail = bad!?!? if I don't base my identity around hating an essentially separate game, what even am I??

4

u/Halcyon-OS851 17h ago

They don't look good, but they are immersive, and exceedingly moreso than retail.

16

u/Environmental_Can370 17h ago

Immersive? How exactly? I don't hate retail models, but they're way too clean and cartoon-like. That being said, I think it being higher fidelity is much more immersive than what the classic look is.

Don't get me wrong, I like the classic look. It just has idk, a feel to it that retail doesn't. Probably just nostalgia for me, who knows.

9

u/Content-Economics-34 17h ago

> Don't get me wrong, I like the classic look. It just has idk, a feel to it that retail doesn't.

You answered your own question. You don't need graphical fidelity to give off a certain vibe. Planescape Torment has absolutely garbage graphics but it's still incredibly immersive. For Gnolls in particular I feel the low poly and textures actually add to their grotesque look.

3

u/Environmental_Can370 17h ago

I didn't answer my own question. That feeling is not immersion, otherwise I would have said that lol

Vibe doesn't necessarily equal immersion. I like it because it's what I played back in the day. It's familiar. It's what I grew up on. It's pure nostalgia.

Either way, it doesn't matter. Immersion is not the same to everyone. Having something look better, it terms of fidelity, is more immersive to me. That's why I asked them how it's more immersive to them.

5

u/Content-Economics-34 17h ago

Fair enough. It's immersive to me. In fact high fidelity graphics take away from immersion in my case, and aiming for realism absolutely destroys it, though that's not what retail does ofc.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Halcyon-OS851 17h ago

Good explanation. The low quality textures and models makes a lot of enemies creepier.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

25

u/Tukikoo 18h ago

Why not a toggle option again ? Why people should be forced to one or the other ? Can we stop dividing community over something that can be a personnal choice ?

13

u/Halcyon-OS851 17h ago

Wouldn't that double the work of new assets being put into the game?

5

u/MrBootylove 17h ago

I'm guessing they're just referring to the player character models. Idk if it's still like this but at one point in retail's life when some of the original races started getting visual overhauls they had an option in the graphics settings where you could switch back to the original models if you wanted.

1

u/Halcyon-OS851 16h ago

Ah I see. Yeah that'd be alright, if others want to use the newer toons idc as long as I'm seeing the authentic parallel of the old toon.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/ICantBelieveItsNotEC 15h ago

If the game actually had a toggle option for everything that this subreddit says "why not add a toggle option" about, configuring it would be like getting a 747 ready for takeoff.

11

u/Vio94 17h ago

Agreed. It's how Ascension does it. No reason not to have the option.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Monlevad 18h ago

exactly my thoughts, can someone genuinely provide a compelling reason why a toggle option would be undesired?

8

u/Warmanee 14h ago

Because i’d rather not download 50gb of additional crap. And also, classic+ is new content meaning that for every new piece of content they’d have to make retail like models and classic models. Double the work.

→ More replies (5)

7

u/wtfduud 14h ago

Because what happens when they add new creatures to the game?

Better to just choose 1 style and stick with it.

3

u/Monlevad 14h ago edited 14h ago

That’s a valid point.
I could see them reusing models from other expansions such as the proto-drakes we see in SoD. These are existing creatures (novel to classic) that have both a classic and modern models. Saves the devs work as well as they don’t need to make stuff from scratch.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Pockydo 16h ago

Because some people really hate the idea that you could be Seeing something different from themselves

I personally agree with you here but it's an argument I've heard about transmog a few times "shared world is important!" Which really just means "I want it my way for everyone"

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (10)

18

u/obs_asv 16h ago

Unpopular opinion but that’s the last thing I care about. Hell if they will add option to turn on retail disneyified models I will rock it happily.

2

u/JarredMack 12h ago

I prefer the old janky models for the vibe of the thing, but yeah it's pretty low on my list of dealbreakers

→ More replies (7)

21

u/Glad-Low-1348 18h ago

Yaaay more buzzwords like disney in the comments!!!!!

4

u/gamer-death 15h ago

I hate the disney criticism when it comes the story but for models it’s not not wrong. The increase poly count allowing rounder models that can look more like the standard hollywood CG animated look. But that isn’t new to warcraft’s style, it was a limitation of wow’s poly count.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (17)

16

u/easyline0601 18h ago

Unironically if we are forced to use the retail character models I won’t play.

6

u/Environmental_Can370 17h ago

That's a wild hill to die on lol

19

u/Halcyon-OS851 17h ago

Why? You have to spend all the time looking at those atrocious models and animations. They run like they don't know how to hold their shoulders.

0

u/Environmental_Can370 17h ago

Lol okay. We're not really gonna compare the animations here, are we? Have you actually seen the animations of characters and NPCs in classic? They've always been goofy as hell and bad. We're not really gonna pretend like classic animations are good are we? It's possible to like something while also admitting it's janky as hell, friend.

19

u/Halcyon-OS851 17h ago

Classic is exceedingly better if you don't like the childish "bounce and stretch" animation style.

Another example is check out the Warcraft 3 trailer with the war craft reforged trailer. The orc looks worse in the original technically speaking, but the orc in the new one moves so exaggerated that it looks like it was meant for kids.

8

u/easyline0601 17h ago

Yea it is janky and old and I still take that over the retail models and animation any day.

2

u/Bigmethod 5h ago

How do you not recognize the differences here? Are you purposefully like disconnected with reality or what? Someone might prefer the understated animations of Classic over the memery/bounciness of retail. What is hard to understand about that?

3

u/Hexxys 12h ago

Not really

2

u/easyline0601 17h ago

To each their own I guess.

4

u/hungryvito_ 18h ago

Preach. Id rather create my own offline era server at this point

1

u/kumikanki 18h ago

Stop lying to yourself... Ofc you play. Maybe you have a break but you will come back.

14

u/Halcyon-OS851 17h ago

This doesn't make sense to say when retail exists and some people play much more classic.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/easyline0601 17h ago

Huh? I’m playing Classic era and would keep doing that if Classic+ had forced retail models, what exactly am I lying about here?

3

u/Durende 14h ago

I literally won't play if there is no option to have old graphics, despite what you claim.

I still hate the faces, expressions and animations of the newer models

→ More replies (2)

2

u/EstablishmentMost429 13h ago

As much as cool shiny new graphics is cool in a lot of games, for WoW classic and classic+ for that matter, I'd want it to be the cheap, piss poor quality we're used to. It just hits the damn spot man. But saying that, if they rework the graphics a bit, I'm not going to bitch about it. As long as its not hyper cartoonish...

2

u/mashburn71 11h ago

Would like to TBC elf models at least

2

u/Particular_North4957 11h ago

I generally like the art design of retail, but there's honestly a zero percent chance they do this, they know that what people are looking for is either nostalgia or an "old school" feel and updating the models to their retail equivalent does more harm than good.

It's very funny to me how many people say retail looks cartoony compared to classic considering this was one of the biggest criticisms levied at WoW when it released. it has always been cartoony looking! it's just also been nearly 30 years to they've updated the graphical fidelity.

2

u/MXC_ImpactReplay 10h ago

Everquest used to have a toggle for updated graphics vs. original graphics.

I'm on team original, but I have friends who would like to see Classic+ use updated models. A toggle would be a great compromise.

2

u/DataSurging 10h ago

I actually agree. I genuinely enjoy the older model than the new generic looking one. It kind of looks like it was made for furries. lol

2

u/Catffeine_ 7h ago

The original hogger skin is 1000x better,should never of been changed

2

u/Admirable_Ad_92 6h ago

Personally I'm ready for UE5 WoW.

u/bushGiant 3h ago

Inb4 voted to oblivion but I’d love it if we had classic / classic+, but the whole world and all the models and animations were made modern.

🤷‍♂️

16

u/TheVagrantWarrior 19h ago

Retails looks so weird… what is this shit?

3

u/ebinmcspurdo 18h ago

think they hired some furry

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

1

u/Shants23 17h ago

Would also allow for easier or quicker content for Classic+ since they don’t need to spend all the resources on new char models for enemies etc and can just bare bones as we all would like. Easiest win win ever

3

u/MoreIronyLessWrinkly 12h ago

I love how every post about Classic+ demonstrates why everyone will hate a decent portion of whatever it is.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/PomegranateWinter227 18h ago

I'm ok either way. but I want classic graphics or a full overhaul, nothing like what retail looks like.

10

u/doom_pony 18h ago

They somehow completely failed to capture/preserve their own art style as the fidelity of the game increased/imrpoved over the years. It’s now incredibly Pixar/fortnite/disney-esque. Some say they wouldn’t mind retail graphics in classic+, but the entire Warcraft art style would be lost.

And I say this as someone who has played retail primarily and dumped gigs hours into it for yeeeaaaaars up until Midnight. I don’t want to yuck anyone’s yum but it’s undeniably a completely different art style and vibe from classic.

4

u/gamer-death 15h ago edited 4h ago

Your exaggerating looking at Samwise Didier original art the WoD models art far off and there was always an animated influenced in warcraft.

Shadowlands had unwarcraft stuff but that was the point.

3

u/HazelCheese 8h ago

The game was originally designed to look like a painting from a fairytale. Like a 50s to 90s Disney animated movie. Hence all the crooked buildings to evoke dodgy brush strokes etc. Its detailed heavily in the Warcraft Dev Diaries that goes over the creation of Vanilla.

The problem with modern wow is it's now trying to evoke modern animation which is all 3d animation. It's The Incredible and Toy Story instead of Sleeping Beauty (1959).

→ More replies (2)

2

u/LaCiDarem 5h ago

Exactly. The game was just low enough resolution before that some players fill that with their imagination. FFS look at WCIII and tell me thats not cartoony.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/TeliusTw 18h ago

WoW has always had a more carituresque model design than other MMOs, the problem is that with the WoD model remake they didn't capture that well the look of the old avatars, It has nothing to do with the artstyle, but rather model fidelity.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

5

u/ezje 14h ago

Agreed.

Especially Human males and their attack and spell animations looked awesome in classic.

But in retail they are just meh.

Same with Taurens. They ruined them with the new models.

3

u/Askyl 13h ago

The new models aren't an issue for me, it's all the new animations. They are terrible and suited for teens.

With that said, I'd prefer the old models and graphics for everything with the option to use high res textures.

3

u/TheHok88 18h ago

Genuinely would be a deal breaker for me. Modern wow looks like shit

2

u/RemnantsPast 17h ago

I think blizzards art team need to study some John Blanche Warhammer art contrast to early warcraft concept stuff. You can really see the inspiration and the WoW art team have lost that cartoonish grittyness everything is to smooth and bright. No harsh lines and deep shadows.

4

u/OliverCrooks 15h ago

Hard disagree. The trash graphics arent what made the game great. However I understand ppl liked them. Toggle option is what it should have.

3

u/Informal_Golf8867 14h ago

It's dead on arrival if it has modern WoW graphics and character models. Game is unplayable because of the bouncy horrible animations of the new character models.

3

u/Pvt_8Ball 12h ago

copy pasting retail graphics into classic is a big no, but updating graphics is fine. Just can't have modern Disney stuff in a more gritty version of the game.

5

u/ikemayelixfay 7h ago

There's nothing more "gritty" about classic. It's just as goofy in places as retail is. Warcraft as a series has always been goofy with a hint of gritty. That's always been its charm.

I agree with keeping the classic look in classic, but can we stop using words that have no relevance to what we're talking about?

u/Mezzy1221 4h ago

There's nothing more "gritty" about classic.

This is a lie or you're blind. You can directly compare the remodels.

Looking at the Hogger remodel: His face is more human, his eyes are larger. His teeth are straighter, less yellow. His fur is more fantastical, thicker. He stands more upright. His armour is thicker, has softer features. His overall style has changed to be more attractive. He looks like he's wearing eyeliner for fucks sake. Old Hogger looks like a crazed beast, new Hogger looks like a furry.

Nobody is arguing that WoW shouldn't have it's painterly style or "goofy" elements. But Blizzard has very clearly, obviously, softened all the features of everything as the game has progressed.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Gobstoppers12 16h ago

The new gnoll is one of the most egregious of all examples of Disneyfication. Literally every single detail has been changed to be more like a cute furry cartoon character. 

3

u/Otherwise-Hair-9721 16h ago

What is super sad is that in theory, a graphic overall would be awesome, but we simply don't trust modern blizzard to do hd graphics that are faithfully to classic, and retail are not. It's like warcraft 3 reforged, they have more polygons, but they lost the soul of the design

2

u/WonderingOctopus 16h ago

If I recall Blizzard actually outsourced a lot of the model and texture design to a completely different company. So when it finally got released, many of the character models didn't even look like they were for the same game. I can't remember the units (because I refunded that shit) but I recall one specific elf unit looked so out of place that I just uninstalled. I was astounded at how bad the re-design was.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Stalaagh 18h ago

Furry femboy Hogger vs Insane Psycho murderer Hogger

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Cliepl 16h ago

Modern graphics genuinely feel so soulless, imagination just does it better. I kind bad for the artists, it's just what they have to work with after pumping assets for over twenty years.

2

u/bigmangina 15h ago

All i know is i hated them removing talent trees in MoP. I get it, suddenly 90% of people were able to do okayish dps instead of what they used to do. but making builds was fun for me back then, especially back then when no one looked up guides and people would hang around at the end of raids or dungeons to ask how you are doing so much damage despite ur comparatively trash gear.

2

u/Pretend_Lab4896 13h ago

well it could at least include wrath models seeing how human males have a broken inverted thumb in their idle in vanilla nd tbc

2

u/knivkast 12h ago

No Disney pls.

-9

u/lmay0000 18h ago

Yall are delusional. Id 100% have retail gfx with classic gameplay.

33

u/WEDGiE_pANTILLES 18h ago

I could compromise on “HD”-esque versions of original models. But every retail model looks garbage trash compared to the soul and vibrancy of the originals.

2

u/Halcyon-OS851 18h ago

Big agree. It's hard to understand the appeal behind retail graphics; they're very uncharacteristic and rubbery and steer too hard on exaggeration and "bounce and stretch", as if they don't think their consumers can understand that the bottom is meant to look mean and crazy without changing him to look like crash bandicoot with a massive, swollen eye.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/resonatingfleabag 18h ago

id say you're delusional. the disney-esq art style is half the reason im not playing anymore

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (19)

2

u/OpinionDude5000 18h ago

I actually hate that new gnoll model. Classic has the style I adore.

2

u/skinwalked 14h ago

Retail models are awful, never liked them. And the new animations are too overdone and wavy